>>1219
It's not a question of morals but a question of practicality, it's almost impossible to be "neutral" vis-a-vis eugenics and disgenics. Every successful society has gone through a period of (basically unintentional) Eugenics. Proto-European brainlets who couldn't plan for the winter starving? Eugenic. Executing a large percentage of violent criminals? Eugenic. Encouraging self-sufficiency and productivity through minimal "safety nets" for social parasites and the non-productive? Eugenic. Paying the lowest class, least productive people for every kid they pop out? Disgenic. Importing foreign savages who haven't undergone a historical eugenic phase and are at a ~15-30 point IQ disadvantage to you, and then paying them to breed? Big-league disgenics.
Non-coercive eugenics that don't violate Christian morality are a constant throughout European history and are obviously preferable to the shit-tier system we have now.