[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / dempart / flutter / islam / jewess / loomis / tingles / xivlg ]

/christianity/ - Christian Theology

Free speech discussion
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


File: d3079096b66b392⋯.jpg (199.75 KB, 1200x900, 4:3, 1200px-Evanjelický_Kostol_….jpg)

40a09b  No.1045

I grew up in a protest church. Presbyterian USA to be specific. It was a very lukewarm environment, and is becoming increasingly liberal and about good feelings. Many of them claim scripture is misinterpreted, yet I increasingly get the feeling they are interpreting scripture in a way that makes them comfortable. It gives the impression to one who has only ever gone their that conservatives are twisting scripture to their own ends.

I've always been interested in theology and philosophy, yet I never felt they went into theology or anything of the sort very much.

I remember my older sibling had to occasionally go to meetings to prepare for becoming an official member of the church, yet perhaps because how few youth went that was never a thing when I was their age.

Many people have since left that church for another. If one family that left had not invited me to a Christian youth group, I would have remained a lukewarm Christian.

Really, they never explained Church doctrine or the differences between denominations. It was never explained why there was a protestant reformation, I never even heard of the Orthodox Church or the belief in the Real Presence within Communion until I went on this site.

So eventually I started to wonder about what Church was the closest to the truth. What Church had the most accurate Biblical translation? At first I looked at the Catholic Church; they claim apostolic succession, and they have a set way of understanding scripture. Is Catholic the true church then?

Yet there is so much going on in the Catholic Church, like nobody can agree about the Pope, and the scandals about the Bishops, and in the past there were indulgences and Popes involved in politics and other possible corruption. So was Luther right? Did the Lutheran Church remove what the Catholics added on but stck to the true teachings? But then why were books of the Bible removed? And why did so many other denominations break off?

Or if it's not the Protestants and not the Catholic, was the Orthodox Church right in breaking off earlier? Are they the true Church? To be honest, I don't even know the reason for the schism or what the differences between the Catholic and Orthodox are. I don't understand the icons, or the worship of Mary, or many apostolic practices. I don't know if they are wrong or not, because they were never even discussed at my church. And so many Churches accuse the leaders of others of being false prophets or even antichrists.

I want to find the correct church, but I know it isn't a decision to be made lightly. I'm terrified of picking the wrong one and I have no understanding of how to even tell.

Pic is just a random Church btw, don't even know what denomination

bb5668  No.1047

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>1045

Who has the accurate Bible translation? Good question. Most people don't even ask this anymore. The only churches which insist on using the received Word, the one that has been handed down unchanged from every generation, are Independent Baptists who aren't part of any denomination. These churches use the KJV, which is based on the original language sources.

There is a long line of copied manuscripts that can be traced through history before finally being compiled and printed in book form about five hundred years ago til the present day. We can trace the history of its use through the centuries, and Scripture itself attests to its own authenticity as "never changing" (Matthew 24:35, 1 Peter 1:25).

Other people aside from these will frequently try to tell you that it doesn't matter very much what Bible you use. They will say there's more than one, and that the modern versions are "better" despite the fact that "modern versions" use sources that weren't around until the year 1881 with the dynamic duo Westcott and Hort. Soon after, many of the so-called "modern versions" began incorporating bits and pieces of the changes introduced by these men. Also, people like C.I. Scofield, the popularizer of dispensational theology (teaching that there is a "chosen race" of Jews) popped up around this time. Scofield was also a fan of their work (1885 RV Bible) and referenced it frequently; the only reason Scofield published his footnotes with the KJV was that, back then (100 years ago), it was still the most used translation. Only later did modern versions start to outsell it due to marketing campaigns.

Here is just one single example of a change that all modern versions have:

Matthew 5:22 (KJV)

But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment:

Matthew 5:22 (modern)

But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment;


a9e5d9  No.1048

File: c50ddc6cc39dd43⋯.jpeg (196.27 KB, 635x915, 127:183, c50ddc6cc39dd439c7dd5f6a8….jpeg)

I don't have that much to add, anon, but a church which uses the Bible as the ONLY form of guidance is damned to end in the same way that your church did. That was why I left the Baptist Church when they started to play wordly music during the cult. There's not a single passage in the Bible, as I know, that says “Thou shoult not play wordly music”, so why not play wordly music? You probably find this logic as weird as I've found. This was the pinnacle of my experience in the Baptist Church.

Catholic and Orthodox Churches have the Holy Tradition because of this. Our saints taught us things that are not explicit in the Bible, and their actions and deeds help us follow the path to the Kingdom of God. Our traditions and liturgies date back from the apostolic times. I'm Orthodox myself, and would recommend you to visit an orthodox church and deliver your questions to a priest.


a25b84  No.1050

>>1047

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulgate

22

Ego autem dico vobis: quia omnis qui irascitur fratri suo, reus erit judicio. Qui autem dixerit fratri suo, raca: reus erit concilio. Qui autem dixerit, fatue: reus erit gehennæ ignis.

>The Douay–Rheims Bible is a translation of the Latin Vulgate, which is itself a translation from Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek texts.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douay%E2%80%93Rheims_Bible

22

But I say to you, that whosoever is angry with his brother, shall be in danger of the judgment. And whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council. And whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.

They both disagree with your Matthew 5:22


bb5668  No.1053

>>1048

Worldly music? I'm pretty sure that's covered in Colossians 2:8. We have a perfect justification not to engage in it.

>I don't have that much to add, anon, but a church which uses the Bible as the ONLY form of guidance is damned to end in the same way that your church did.

My church is independent from whatever you were just referring to. As I said in my intro post, it's an independent baptist church. As in, no denomination, no parachurch organization.

>a church which uses the Bible as the ONLY form of guidance

Ok so to get to the deeper point here, we agree. The Holy Spirit is also essential to understanding Scripture. This only source of teaching is something that only a saved, believing individual has access to. If you like, I can bring up some scripture for this as a reference and will pray that God can open your understanding to these things.

For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.

Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God.

Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual. – 1 Corinthians 2:11-13

But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you. – John 14:26

Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.

He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you. – John 16:13-14


32ed54  No.1056

File: 49d08dc33d62af5⋯.jpg (2.5 MB, 2093x5085, 2093:5085, Screenshot_20190126-143651….jpg)

Take EVERY internet recommendation with a grain of salt.

The best ways to judge the different denominations are

1 - compare their confessional documents against the Bible

2 - look where they put their money

For my southern Baptists, our confessional document is the baptist faith and message

Sbc.net/bfm2000

Our way of sharing resources is called the cooperative program. A majority goes to international missions, then local missions, seminaries and so on.


bb5668  No.1058

>>1056

Just to piggy back off this guy, here is a resource to help locating IFB churches. Definitely a useful resource to start you on your search.

http://militarygetsaved.tripod.com/findchurch.html


bb5668  No.1168

>>1050

>They both disagree with your Matthew 5:22

And neither one is based on the original languages, so this is not relevant here.


d6d701  No.1169

>>1047

>These churches use the KJV, which is based on the original language sources.

misinformation

every translation is based directly on the original, except for the catholarp duoay rheims


bb5668  No.1185

>>1169

>every translation is based directly on the original,

Then why do they disagree?


00858d  No.1186

File: c7b46d3f3445302⋯.jpg (58.95 KB, 781x444, 781:444, types-of-bible-translation….jpg)

>>1185

Different translation methods, different scholars, different year


ed3146  No.1187

>>1045

I have the best advice you're going to find in this thread. Do extensive research yourself and don't base this decision on the advice of the vultures that always circle these threads on every single Christian imageboard.

Polite sage


215b06  No.1348

Orthodox.. and we mostly love the KJV (at least when it lines up with the LXX). I doubt that's enough of a sell for Baptists though. Heh.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / dempart / flutter / islam / jewess / loomis / tingles / xivlg ]