>>826217
I wonder the same thing, based on having read Genesis recently. The book tells this story:
>God's people go to a city
>They take the natives' wealth
>Locals get mad
>They leave
and this happens through several generations. Sure the book is coy about how they acquire wealth, saying God "blessed" them, but it gradually becomes less coy, and by Exodus 3:22 the Abrahamic strategy is described explicitly.
I really like the answer by >>826224, but it would suggest, based on Genesis, that what God considers wise is nepotism. That's not to say God is not good. Caring for people genetically close to you is objectively good, imo.
To answer your question based on the wisdom concept, I think it's wise to be able to consider all possibilities. That means not committing to beliefs that preclude you from simultaneously holding other beliefs. That is to say that what choice is wise depends on context, and will change over time. So committing to any one interpretation of God is not Godly. Godliness is adaptability and intelligence. God is the force that drives human evolution, and God's people are those bloodlines which survive toward the future horizon of humanity.