They're gonna build another one, right?

Email
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
Password	(Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf Max filesize is 16 MB. Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000. You may upload 5 per post.

Christanon 04/15/19 (Mon) 18:43:36 711bb6 No.796251

They're gonna build another one, right?

Christanon 04/15/19 (Mon) 19:10:58 9decf3 No.796292

A "spiritual" temple maybe.

Christanon 04/15/19 (Mon) 19:45:13 a6b049 No.796357

>>796251

Chill, it's not even that bad. That building survived Robespierre no sweat, fire isn't going to undo our lady's church.

Christanon 04/15/19 (Mon) 19:55:29 a6b049 No.796384

>>796357

Ok apologies, way worse than I imagined

Christanon 04/16/19 (Tue) 06:07:02 3724af No.796731

>>796251

no way the public will agree, im sure they've studied the original enough to recreate it

Christanon 04/16/19 (Tue) 06:30:12 b93b78 No.796738

>>796251

Oh God, make it a mosque please.

Christanon 04/16/19 (Tue) 06:31:24 3724af No.796739

>>796738

t. butthurt orthodox

Christanon 04/16/19 (Tue) 06:36:53 f7f45b No.796740

File: bb502ef85c5387a⋯.jpg (131.56 KB, 1024x682, 512:341, notre-dame-754.jpg)

>>796251

What do you mean build? The only need to rebuild the roof. The Lord spared the inside.

Christanon 04/16/19 (Tue) 07:06:50 ffa643 No.796742

God's wrath against popish idolatry

Christanon 04/16/19 (Tue) 07:15:22 f7f45b No.796749

File: 58ccbef5aab1797⋯.jpg (85.31 KB, 1023x859, 1023:859, lu34488010205-3.jpg)

>>796742

>posts this under a picture of the 'idols' around the altar being miraculously preserved

Quite a damper on the party you and your Saracen friends were about to star.

Christanon 04/16/19 (Tue) 07:41:40 899dc2 No.796755

>>796251

why are you so attached to worldly edifices anon? Does this mean French Catholics gonna become like Jews now and start praying in front of ruined temple walls in vain hopes that a structure will get rebuilt some day?

>>796742

based

Christanon 04/16/19 (Tue) 07:47:00 f7f45b No.796757

>>796755

Wasn't that Cain's logic? Why offer beauty to God when I can just do a mediocre effort?

And any man of faith of course is not happy when beauty dedicated to God's glory is ruined.

Christanon 04/16/19 (Tue) 09:05:43 899dc2 No.796770

>>796757

the point wasn't that beauty is pointless, it was that being attached to a particular expression of beauty that God has obviously destroyed for some reason, is dubious.

Christanon 04/16/19 (Tue) 09:16:42 f7f45b No.796776

File: 4727dd377c22e79⋯.jpg (43.88 KB, 1024x683, 1024:683, 1555397652881.jpg)

>>796770

How many protestant churches burned or were bombed or destroyed by tornadoes?

Beauty is created by men to please God, investing their God given skills, money, labour, etc. ie doing as much as humanly possible to please God out of love for God. It's nothing more than a natural expression of that love.

All that comes from God is good, beauty is good, therefore it comes from God. And the more beautiful something is, the more 'goodness' it has, therefore it's closer to God. Now, to claim that for some reason God does not like the highest degrees of beauty ie the degrees that are the closest to him, is dubious.

Christanon 04/16/19 (Tue) 09:40:04 899dc2 No.796783

>>796776

>Now, to claim that for some reason God does not like the highest degrees of beauty ie the degrees that are the closest to him, is dubious.

Yes, so why are you implying that's what was said? A "particular expression of beauty" in this case, clearly meant the Notre Dame cathedral specifically. You can call that "the highest degrees of beauty" or whatever, but that doesn't exclude other designs from reaching that same degree of beauty. So why are we discussing rebuilding this specific building instead of just letting go and creating something new and more beautiful instead? Once again, the issue here is the attachment, not the beauty.

Christanon 04/16/19 (Tue) 09:47:07 f7f45b No.796785

>>796783

The attachment comes from knowing that this particular expression of beauty cannot be recreated. It is a result of blood, sweat and tears of the citizens of Paris, it is a physical manifestation of their love of God. Think about it this way: people thought well how can I use my 2 hands to spread God's glory? and built it.

We can't restore the Rose window that burned because we don't know the technique anymore. We can't rebuild the roof without steel supports. Simply put, in all likelihood, we can't create something more beautiful. Have you seen how modern churches look? Are you sure the modern man can create beauty anymore?

And again, there's nothing wrong with being attached to a form of beauty that is pretty much no longer obtainable.