>>770051
>/lit/ was always trash; full of pseudo-intellectuals who are familiar with the most famous and surface level books. It's like if /v/ only ever talked about the games that were in IGN's top 100 games list or if /a/ only ever talked about whatever anime are on Netflix.
Congratulations … you just decoded the internet. Feel proud of yourself?
/v/ is EXACTLY like that, a bunch of pretentious bundleofsticks that go on and on and on about their favourite japanese RPG or that "mildly obscure" game about the gay pony, but mostly want to mouth off about the fact that they got banned from this discord server and call of duty would be awesome if not for [insert-thing].
Can't speak for /a/. I thought it was /a/nimals.
I also can't speak for 4/lit/ because 4/*/ is a turgid little playground for 12yo normies anyway, but /lit/ here is a allbutdead somewhat-lefty formerly-interesting place to discuss half-decent books, mostly philosophy.
>>770019
>4chan (particularly /lit/) has been irreversibly altered due to non-Christians being able to use the internet.
4chins was ALWAYS a place run-by and run-for fedora atheists. WHEN do you think it was ever different? (pic related)
Now, that didn't mean Christians couldn't fight back. I was part of that crowd off-and-on, but I'm not sure anything had an impact. Same as now. You can waste hours trying to make some people see things our way.
I guess I played that game back when and tend to think I'd be just as useful screaming from a street corner with a Bible in my hand.
Given the choice, I think I'd prefer to go to Africa. There's at least SOME willing or teachable hearts.
Either way, to answer your question:
>ITT: Post websites you used to enjoy that have been ruined by non-Christian culture
/christian/
No, I know it just sounds like snark, but it half-way isn't.
I point to two things: (a) we're ALL afflicted by non-Christian culture, it oozes within most of us (you're exempt if you're posting from, say, deep rural Poland or Baghdad) and (b) there's too much /pol/ influence here, and by that I don't mean right-wing Christians, I mean /pol/lacks who "Christianity's the basis of civilisation, so wtf I love Christianity nao?!" but haven't actually embraced Christ and are still too toxic in their root beliefs
If you won't let me have that, then I'll spout off about "the entire social media network" because I am sick to death of hearing about the utterly unforgiving nature of the pitchfork and torch brigade that want to burn alive every person who has in some way, in the past twelve years since Web2.0 was a thing, offended somebody else and we all have to robotically lurch after them.
Right now I am inspired by the gays who hate Kevin Hart. Not that I give a particular shi- about Hart, but the vitriol and unforgiving nature of man makes me think, "WHO in their right mind would SEEK any fame or fortune that was in any possible way dependent upon the good graces of "the internet public"?"
You want to be a politician – I did once – this is the mindless rabble you have to deal with.
You want to be in the entertainment industry – I did once – this is the toxic vengeance-seekers you have to deal with.
You work for a major corporation, your company will take responsibility for the tweets you post, so you're not allowed to post anything ANYBODY could possibly take offence at … and by this I do not mean you maliciously or even jokingly sperg out over jews, but even if you espouse a polite, reasoned opposition to a gay marriage bill or to a transsexual toilet option, you're in the firing line for being "counselled" by corporate HR.
I would happily see the whole internet burned down than let this river of bile persist.
/rant