[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / dempart / leftpol / lovelive / mde / tingles / vg / xivlg ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? the Lord is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?

File: 3745eb6dfd88cb7⋯.jpeg (181.85 KB, 693x960, 231:320, AF5F7D3A-7959-47DC-80A4-D….jpeg)

230b67  No.767245

In being a christian, while our count for holy wars and general bodycount is far lower then that of islam, we must in some manner acknowledge several grouseome incidents in our collective history, from its inception to modern day. Some examples:

>killing of the egyptian firstborn

>the killing and driving out of the caananites

>the civilian casualties in the crusades, i.e. the killing of women and children of all faiths during the capture of jerusalem

>the destruction of the aztec and meaoamerican and south american empires and their subsumation into spain

Is there such a thing as christian genocide apologetics? How do you reconcile these events in your heart? I have reconcilled the genocide of heathens insamuch as they have worshipped demons such as ba’al or moloch, and yet I fear for the eternal souls of the women and children who sat on the sidelines of these terrible instances. It is incredibly hard to talk with nonbeleivers about these issues as well, and I’d like to desicate this thread to discussing these events.

dc05a0  No.767258

>how do you do fellow Christians.

SAGE


4eb9de  No.767260

>>767258

<doesnt sage


b6c1e7  No.767264

Joshua did nothing wrong driving out the sick and disgusting Canaanites. Pharoah was a reprobate that wouldn't listen to God and brought the plauges upon him self.

>civilian casualties

What? You mean war is bad and civilians got hurt ? The horror someone should do something about it.

>muh cannibalistic aztec/meso american ancestors dindu nuffin! Darn you Cortez for civilizing us pagan savages

OP, you are a faggot. If you truly believe rape, incest, and child sacrifice is a valid religion that dindu nuffin, than you are lost and I will pray for a sinner like you.

What are your apologetics on the pagan vikangz enslaving white people and selling them off into sex slavery to Muslims? What are your apologetics on ritual baby murder and ritual fornication? Why should people give up on something that has been proven to work for over thousands of years for some idols that can't do anything? Why should humanity regress into barbaric retardation and play right into the hands of (((them)))?


80f0b8  No.767278

>killing of the egyptian firstborn

That was God, and He did nothing wrong.

>the killing and driving out of the caananites

Honestly, the Israelites were wrong in failing to fully exterminate them.

>the civilian casualties in the crusades, i.e. the killing of women and children of all faiths during the capture of jerusalem

I get the feeling that the facts are misrepresented my the mainstream media's popular image of the Crusades, just like the Inquisition is.

>the destruction of the aztec and meaoamerican and south american empires and their subsumation into spain

Retribution for centuries of human sacrifice and idolatry. They chose their fate. Subsumation into the Spanish empire has given them, first and foremostly, salvation. They would not have found our Lord and Savior otherwise. In addition, mesoamericans now have indoor plumbing, basic sanitation, modern medicine, and a more Western way of life.


11f862  No.767285

File: aea900f4cae380d⋯.png (51.21 KB, 300x300, 1:1, FoghornLeghorn2.png)

>>767245

https://blog.jim.com/war/how-to-genocide-inferior-kinds-in-a-properly-christian-manner/

>And now, the much promised, much foreshadowed, account of how to genocide inferior races and take their stuff in a good Christian fashion, as our ancestors did; Past best practice for acquiring land and resources currently occupied by no-good people who prevent it from being put to its highest and best use while supporting, rather than undermining, your society’s high trust equilibrium:

>A bunch of white American settlers want to settle on American Indian land. Indians have previously indicated that they are unhappy with this, and there are previous agreements that white people will not settle on this land. You offer them payment, including a lot of barrels of firewater. Indians accept the deal, land for nice stuff, including lots of firewater. They get drunk, stay drunk, while settlers move in and build some forts.

>After a while, the whiskey runs out. The Indians wake up with a blazing hangover, no food, and no hunting grounds. “We have been cheated”, they wail.

>They demand their land back. The settlers in the fort tell them to go to hell.

>Some braves agree to go bravely looking for some undefended or minimally defended white women and children. They catch a woman, and two small children. Whom they rape, then skin, then burn alive. Then they bravely go back to their tribe and tell their tribe. “Well now it is war. So which side are you on. The side of us very brave braves, or the side of the people who took your land and gave you this hangover?”

>The tribe declares for the warpath.

>And then you kill them all and take their stuff.

>Weston’s error was that he proposed to kill them and take their stuff without first legitimately purchasing the land and tempting them into committing unspeakable crimes. Had he done so, and obtained the land in that fashion, then this would have created the dangerous precedent that some stronger party could take the land from him, undermining the high trust equilibrium that made the great achievements of his society, of which he was so proud, possible, for that high trust equilibrium and the ensuing high achievements rested on tribal taboos and copy-book maxims.


70f777  No.767287

Aztecs…

You realize the Aztecs were a relatively new empire that was constantly enslaving it's neighbours as it grew and doing insane human sacrifices (read up on it, it's stomach churning). Cortez was begged by a coalition of the smaller tribes to attack them.

You can also watch Apocalypto, its a great modern movie that's almost historically accurate.


1e816e  No.767310

>>767278

>>killing of the egyptian firstborn

>That was God, and He did nothing wrong.

All you need to know about christians.


09db42  No.767313

Sage


06f581  No.767319

>>767310

>God punishing pharaoh for disobeying Him by killing all the first born children in Egypt as a way to show irony of pharaoh's policies of killing the first born sons of Israeli families is evil

>but ritual child sacrifice, incest, gang rape, and murder as demanded by false gods is a okay

the absolute hypocritical state of fedoras


12e3b8  No.767341

>>767319

<ritual child sacrifice, incest, gang rape, and murder as demanded by false gods is a okay

Except he didn't say any of that. You people are so ridiculous. He clearly just pointing out that "if God does it, it's good." is a horrifically immoral and erratic concept. It isn't from the point of view of anyone who believes in God, because He is the source of all good and all light and all that, but from the perspective of someone who doesn't (or someone who believes in the entity but not all the memes) it seems to be nothing more than a golden ticket on which to write anything as justified and/or justifiable.

Of course every single thing God does is okay. Of course every single thing God sanctions is okay. They're not only okay, they're good. If God said "let there be ritual child sacrifice, incest, gang rape and murder" you would celebrate those things - as you should! You have no claim to morality other than "God -> Good". His supreme authority is unquestionable. You should accept any and all terrible things done with the backing of God, as they are necessarily good. It is said when God tortured the Egyptians He also hardened the pharaohs heart, so that he would not give in to the demands of Moses. It would seem that He only did this to have reason to continue His cruelty. But this is good, as all things He does is good. Don't shy from it, lest people be witness to your absolutely hypocritical state.


59c97a  No.767406

>>76725

>>767264

Bruh I’m as christian as they come. I think that the crusades and wars against the caananites are absolutely fine and in keeping with God especially when the pagans practice religion as vile as you said. Apologies if my OP came off as otherwise.

If we want to evangelize we need to tackle these questions in ways that make sense to those opposed to the faith. We need to show people how vile their religion is so that they convert and get saved. Yet the women and children on the side of the enemy who die will be brought against us. The women who blatantly support and take part in these abominations are obviously damned, but what about the ones who beleive in it yet never took part? What about the ones where it was against their will? Take a savage girl who is a part of a pagan gang rape, and dies in the process. Is their soul just damned as they never heard god? Or does god introduce himself before passing judgement? What happens to a caananite kid who dies as jericho’s wall falls?

These questions will and have been brought against us and we need to specify the answers to those who are on the sidlelines.


4b6e14  No.767413

>killing of the egyptian firstborn

They were warned shit would happen.

And besides they also killed every Hebrew baby in the time of Moses.

>the killing and driving out of the caananites

<sacrifice children

<don't deserve to die

>the civilian casualties in the crusades, i.e. the killing of women and children of all faiths during the capture of jerusalem

Those are in hell. Their mission was to winnie the pooh Muslims out of Jerusalem.

The blood of those innocents is on their hands only. It wasn't the fault of the Church in any possible point of view.

One army was even excommunicated when they winnie the poohed Constantinopole to the ground.

>the destruction of the aztec and meaoamerican and south american empires and their subsumation into spain

What Spain does concerns their government only. The church only said, go there and preach the gospel.

Portugal did no blood bath for example.

And the guilty part here was the bacteria on the Europeans that infected the natives since they had no immunity to it.

Why did God allowed all of this thing to happen, people died omg.

Because death isn't final and eternal life awaits those who died in the Lord.

And if God knew one of those souls would eventually become Christians he would let them die without becoming one.

One soul for God is more important than the entire universe.


4b6e14  No.767414

>>767413

>Wouldn't let them die

Fixed.


230b67  No.767527

>>767285

>get the injun drunk then take his land

Is it really ok to tempt your enemies into evil? I mean god did do that somewhat when he hardened pharaohs heart.


4c2f17  No.767530

>>767527

It isn't okay to make someone worse than they are, it isn't okay to lead them astray. However, it is okay to encourage them to demonstrate their dysfunction overtly so that the justification for their subjugation is readily apparent.


53f049  No.767544

>>767527

>Is it really ok to tempt your enemies into evil? I mean god did do that somewhat when he hardened pharaohs heart.

Read the whole episode of events. The Exodus story has Pharoah making his own choices.

"But when Pharaoh saw that there was respite, he hardened his heart, and hearkened not unto them; as the Lord had said." (Exodus 8:11).

Over and over the plagues come, but Pharaoh is obstinate of his own free will. It isn't until the end that it uses that turn of phrase you mention. So what does that mean, and why latch on only to that last one?


48bb6c  No.767549

Souls are immortal.


042d5d  No.767556

>>767549

No spirit is immortal


e38971  No.767559

File: c5195e36a06e604⋯.jpg (33.37 KB, 415x470, 83:94, 2l0ahe.jpg)

>>767556

<God is mortal


ba66c0  No.767560

>>767245

Not every christian kill others. Some christians might have misunderstood the faith or used the dogma to wage wars, but not all. And they have no business with christianity as a faith, they change nothing, the blood is on their own hands and not other believers.


11f862  No.768329

File: 29fff2e4633b355⋯.jpg (61.82 KB, 639x567, 71:63, d048e84b42afc1941d428e2dce….jpg)

>>767527

The point of the bait is that it only works on stupid, impulsive, evil people.

If not stupid and impulsive, will not trade good land for trinkets and alcohol. And if not evil, will not respond with violence. When does both, has proven himself inferior, and has given you casus belli, hence fine to genocide him and take his land.


2b6ef3  No.768382

>>767556

>No spirit is immortal

Except they literally are, heretic.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / dempart / leftpol / lovelive / mde / tingles / vg / xivlg ]