[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / choroy / dempart / fascist / jenny / klpmm / komica / leftyb / lounge ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? the Lord is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

912a8c  No.766060

I've spent about 2 days reading sceptic stuff criticizing the Bible and have yet to find anything substantial from them.

I found this "god hates shrimp" site and ended up reading and researching more about the dietary laws in the Bible. Here are the parts I find relevant:

Old Testament Jewish Food Prohibitions:

(Leviticus 11:1-47)

(Deuteronomy 14:1-21)

New Testament Doing Away With Food Prohibitions:

(Matthew 15:10-20)

(Acts 10:9-16)

So I think these "skeptics" are Bible illiterate idiots that couldn't be bothered to actually read the whole bible and to do any serious research. The only thing that is making my mind meltdown right now is Matthew 5…

"For I tell you truly, until heaven and earth pass away, not a single jot, not a stroke of a pen, will disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished."

(Matthew 5:18)

https://biblehub.com/bsb/matthew/5.htm

This part is quoted by skeptics a lot. I need help to understand it. I've thought about it in different ways and here are some interpretations I've come up with:

1. Jesus has already fulfilled the law so they can be changed now? I guess that would mean that in Matthew 15 and Acts 10 he must have already been crucified at that point?

2. The law is valid… except those parts that have been done away with, in which case, Matthew 5:18 is worded wrongly?

3. The Law means God's Law… which is not the same as that which is laid out in Leviticus. Leviticus is not entirely legit.

This is making me wonder if the Bible is in fact fallible. I am mostly leaning on the 2nd interpretation btw and thinking that Matthew 5:18 Jesus wasn't being serious there. I guess it's okay for someone to say "it's all valid except x, y, z" but the thing is he didn't immediately follow up saying that and then give the exceptions, the exceptions are given quite awhile later in Matthew 15.

I find it hard to believe that god actually wants us to restrict our diet. At least when I was studying Hinduism before when they suggest not to eat onions, they have an actual reason for it which is also supported by later scientific findings, which is that onions/garlic/etc. has a chemical in it that passes the blood-brain barrier, and makes your brain foggy; and you can confirm this by seeing how it's harder to meditate after eating such foods. There might be some kind of reason not to eat pigs and ravens and snakes and whatever else was prohibited under Leviticus 11:1 but I'm really not sure.

On a side note I'm starting to take notes about what Jesus says is sin. e.g. "Again, anyone who says to his brother, ‘Raca,’ will be subject to the Sanhedrin." (Raca being an expression of contempt). I've been wondering for quite awhile what is sin or not and totally lost about the matter and I'm thinking I should start to take the word of Jesus above everyone else in the Bible, so I'm trying to study what he said in the red text parts, and weighing it against everything else, and plan on doing an experiment of living by Jesus's word alone (which a lot of it is all about not even having impure thoughts) and see what happens in my life as a result of abstaining from sin in this way. I want to see if I can be even better than those Pharisees.

cfe77f  No.766062

>>766060

The Lord is referring to the 10 commandments.


000257  No.766063

Father literally gave a homily about this today.


a859e2  No.766064

>>766060

Timothy 4:3 warns us not to trust people saying foods are unclean.

<They forbid marriage and demand abstinence from foods that God created to be received with gratitude by those who believe and know the truth.

Genesis 9:3 says you can eat anything.

<Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.

Don't try to mimic Jesus. That's a losing battle and will end in sorrow for you anyway. A lot of the good stuff in the Bible is in the books the kikes told Luther to remove.


912a8c  No.766065

>>766063

Tbh I have been in two different churches and literally every church I go to, every single time, it literally on topic with answering exactly what's going on in my mind the day before and the time leading up to me going there. Like I walk into a Church and they're always talking about what was on my mind. Synchronicity like crazy.

So tell me what did you learn about it?

>>766062

I like your answer but if you can provide citation supporting it please?


912a8c  No.766066

>>766064

>Don't try to mimic Jesus.

Why not? It seems like a good experiment and one that I could learn from.

>That's a losing battle and will end in sorrow for you anyway.

In sorrow I start, in sorrow I will return, but in the meanwhile I might obtain some clarity. Primarily I am thinking about changing my thoughts btw, I'm not so much concerned about my actions or mimicking the outward stuff, but rather just not sinning in my thoughts. No anger, no covetousness, no lust, no condemnation, etc. in my thoughts. I want to see what happens when I restrain all these bad thoughts. Personally I think it will be easy to accomplish and that I won't fail. I just hope that I obtain spiritual ascent from practicing it, because, if I do it and no changes come about from doing it, I will probably give it up.

>A lot of the good stuff in the Bible is in the books the kikes told Luther to remove.

Are you talking about The Apocrypha?


509df6  No.766067

Well, if you go by the Catechism of the Catholic Church, "the Law" in this case is a reference to natural law - which is, of course, included in the New Law. The Old Law - Leviticus and the like - is fulfilled in Christ, and therefore isn't necessary (it was only there to prepare the Jews for the coming of the Messiah, and could be - aside from the natural law within it - ignored) once the Messiah arrived. Our Lord is saying that the natural law is the same, even though He has come to fulfill the Old Law.

Sauce on these claims: http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p3s1c3a1.htm


912a8c  No.766071

>>766067

Oh well that's good news to hear as I am very heavily influenced by natural philosophy.

When you say "The Old Law is fulfilled in Christ" and so "isn't necessary" what kind of attitude then should I have to the Old Law?


509df6  No.766077

>>766071

>what kind of attitude then should I have to the Old Law?

<Can I eat shrimp?

Sure, Matthew 15:11 says so. This is a part of the Old Law, but not natural law, and isn't applicable to post-Christ (not to mention non-Jewish/Gentile) believers.

<Can I commit sodomy?

Hard no. 1 Corinthians 6:9 and Matthew 10:15 (among others) say this. This is part of the Old Law (Leviticus 20:13), sure - but you don't have to kill sodomites (the Lord would prefer you to convert them). The Old Law in this case has aspects of the natural law; we are to follow the natural law, but not the Old Law.

Essentially, I'd recommend what some anons on here recommended to a new follower of Christ who asked what he should read first. They told him to read the Gospel, and then read the Bible cover to cover, interpreting it through the Gospel. You should have that sort of attitude towards the Old Law - it is interpreted through the coming of Christ our Lord and Savior, who fulfilled it and perfected it.


bb4669  No.766082

File: a42262be2294797⋯.jpg (298.64 KB, 720x1091, 720:1091, infographic-bible-clean-vs….jpg)

>>766060

>I find it hard to believe that god actually wants us to restrict our diet. At least when I was studying Hinduism before when they suggest not to eat onions, they have an actual reason for it which is also supported by later scientific findings, which is that onions/garlic/etc. has a chemical in it that passes the blood-brain barrier, and makes your brain foggy; and you can confirm this by seeing how it's harder to meditate after eating such foods. There might be some kind of reason not to eat pigs and ravens and snakes and whatever else was prohibited under Leviticus 11:1 but I'm really not sure.

There are some arguments that the laws are for health purposes. Like, there are certain 'legalist' denominations (or heresies, depending on who you ask) of Christianity that argue this. The Armstrongite Churches of God, various British-Israel or Christian-Identity groups, Seventh Day Adventists, some Messianic Jews or Hebrew Roots groups, etc. The arguments they give do sound pretty reasonable. Basically, the prohibited animals are mostly scavengers who can live off of carrion and diseased flesh, and tend to be full of parasites, like pork with trichinosis. Sea creatures like lobsters and crabs are also bottom-feeders that feast on sewage. Basically they are nature's garbage disposal system and not fit for consumption.

An example of this line of reasoning:

https://www.ucg.org/bible-study-tools/booklets/what-does-the-bible-teach-about-clean-and-unclean-meats/infographic-which

Having said that, the New Testament does seem to say that they are okay to eat now. There are various other interpretations that try to explain that away, but I don't know how plausible they are. They don't seem to be the most straightforward reading of the text. And now that we have modern refrigeration, ovens, etc., a lot of things that may have once been dangerous are not so dangerous any more. I don't think Jews regard their dietary restrictions as having a health basis, but just see it as another way God keeps them separate from gentiles. Muslims have some similar restrictions, and from what I've heard they do see them as healthy to follow.

So basically, my understanding is the restricted foods may or may not be unhealthy, and almost certainly were risky to eat in ancient Israel, but there is no spiritual requirement to avoid them.


75f69a  No.766108

File: a84190386b77ea5⋯.png (167.48 KB, 600x578, 300:289, repent.png)

>>766064

>don't mimic Jesus

That's literally what we are called to do as Christians; we should strive to be like Christ in every action of every day.


912a8c  No.766117

>>766077

Converting sodomites would be preferable but failing that is killing them okay? They have a habit of raping men in prisons and molesting children and being the primary carriers of most of the STDs and doing all kinds of damage to society that one would wish to prevent. If human laws changed where it became okay to execute sodomites could I partake in the great cleansing of the country?

>Essentially, I'd recommend what some anons on here recommended to a new follower of Christ who asked what he should read first. They told him to read the Gospel, and then read the Bible cover to cover, interpreting it through the Gospel. You should have that sort of attitude towards the Old Law - it is interpreted through the coming of Christ our Lord and Savior, who fulfilled it and perfected it.

I read the Bible start to finish but… OT first and then NT. Maybe I should start again but NT, OT, and then NT again a second time for good measure.


a3a9a2  No.766121

>>766108

Seriously.. everyone from Orthodox/theosis, Catholic teaching, and even boomer evangelicals with their WWJD signs know this much.


7fe22e  No.766124

>>766064

>Don't try to mimic Jesus

How do people like this end up here? This is among the most basic parts of Christianity.

>That's a losing battle

With our own strength alone, it is. With God, we can triumph, though complete and final triumph comes only in following Jesus through death and resurrection.


912a8c  No.766127

>>766082

Makes sense but what is the health risk involved in eating rabbits?

Also something I could add to what you wrote (after looking at your picture there) is a lot of the animals on the right are higher up the food chain (carnivores) and thus there is a higher bio-accumulation of toxins involved in eating them.


c536d3  No.766154

>>766108

>>766121

>>766124

Trying to become God is luciferianism and evil.


bb4669  No.766155

>>766127

>Makes sense but what is the health risk involved in eating rabbits?

I wasn't sure, so I searched and found this:

https://amazingdiscoveries.org/C-deception-unclean_animals_pig_fish_mammals

>Rabbits

>Even though the rabbit is herbivorous, Leviticus 11:6 states that it is unclean. The rabbit has a very enlarged caecum. In order for the rabbit to obtain sufficient nutrients from the plants it eats, it has to ferment the material. This requires a fermentation chamber with an alkaline environment. Since the rabbit does not have a pre-stomach, like the cow does, it has to use its enlarged caecum.

>However, its caecum is sandwiched between its gut and rectum and most of the absorption of the nutrients takes place there. When the rabbit redigests this material, it becomes coprophagous. In other words, it eats its own excrement. Consequently, the level of toxins in its tissues is far higher than in other herbivores. Bile salts, fatty acids, gases, and ammonia levels are all at unacceptable levels for human consumption. All rodents, and even the horse, fall into the same category.


912a8c  No.766161

>>766155

Oh wow. Started reading that link of yours. This is making me think Leviticus was not so arbitrary as I was originally thinking.

Aren't there some sea creatures that live only on phytoplankton though that should be okay for to us eat that wouldn't be allowed under Leviticus? I know most shrimps, molluscs, etc. are detrivores that eat everything including fish poop and rotting flesh and so on but there are I think some species that strictly live on phytoplankton.

What about Jellyfish for instance?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jellyfish_as_food


912a8c  No.766167

https://amazingdiscoveries.org/C-deception-diet_unclean_clean_law_Bible

Just finished reading second page of this and onto the third part. Starting to wonder if I should observe these things or not.


7fe22e  No.766171

>>766154

Christ is not just God, Christ is also the perfect man. It's completely indisputable that we're called to imitate Him in that capacity, though we're not good enough to do that on our own.


912a8c  No.766174

https://amazingdiscoveries.org/clean-animals-human-diet-unclean-animals-bible-health-laws

Here he seems to suggest a diet of fruit and grains only is best. I used to eat like that – for several years straight. I was very sick in that time. I am not sure how seriously I can take this site.


912a8c  No.766191

>>766154

Oh boy. There is only one instance of Lucifer (The Morning Star) mentioned in the Bible. You are wrong to conflate Lucifer with anything evil. You are heavily influenced evidently by some recent deceptions that only started like the last few hundred years.

Also Venus is not exactly the most evil of deities.


d50029  No.766201

>>766154

>My Luciferian senses are tingling

Do you wear an apron by any chance?


bb4669  No.766202

>>766174

I will clarify that for you, the website is run by Seventh Day Adventists. They teach that we should follow the food laws God gave us in the Bible, but they then go beyond that and recommend people eat vegetarian/vegan, because Ellen White said so. I would just take whatever useful information you find and ignore the vegetarian stuff.


0b53ed  No.766206

>>766154

>Trying to become God is luciferianism and evil.

Trying to become a "god" in your own right is. Actually getting to know God and having him rub off on you is literally the Christian walk. What do you think baptism is?

"For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ." - Gal 3:27

"Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls." - Matt 11:29

" You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect." - Matt 5:48

" A disciple is not above his teacher, but everyone when he is fully trained will be like his teacher." - Luke 6:40

And if you can't do that, at least follow those who are trying:

"Be imitators of me, as I am of Christ." - St. Paul, 1 Cor 11:1

"Whoever says he abides in him ought to walk in the same way in which he walked." -1 John 2:6

"For to this you have been called, because Christ also suffered for you, leaving you an example, so that you might follow in his steps." -1 Pet 2:21

"To put off your old self, which belongs to your former manner of life and is corrupt through deceitful desires, and to be renewed in the spirit of your minds, and to put on the new self, created after the likeness of God in true righteousness and holiness." - Ephesians 4:22-24

"Therefore be imitators of God, as beloved children. And walk in love, as Christ loved us and gave himself up for us, a fragrant offering and sacrifice to God." - Ephesians 5:1-2


912a8c  No.766208

>>766202

Hmmmm.

Btw, I've been thinking in the last few days about "Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life". (2 Corinthians 3:6)

Should I interpret that to mean that we should not get too caught up in the fine details of what is being said in the Bible and instead "get the gist of it"?

e.g. of how I might apply this; regarding the food laws maybe the details don't matter so much as the principle of "eat in such a way as you know to be conducive to good health".

Another example: when Jesus gives various examples of how we sin just with our thoughts, the general principle seems to be to not think unclean thoughts, and maybe the specific details given in the bible aren't too important?

…or would I be in error in thinking I have to extract the principles only and that I actually should observe forms, customs, each and every specific example given, etc?

Also I think, just my attitude, but I feel like the holy spirit is present with me to do the work of making me perfect and filling me as to the details. I think I need the principles from the bible but the guidance of the holy spirit to deal with the details of life.


3aeb37  No.766262

>>766060

The Law didn't disappear. It's still right there in the Bible, and if you really want to you can follow it. But there's no salvation in it. The Law won't save you, so why bother with it?


514d41  No.766276

>>766065

>I like your answer but if you can provide citation supporting it please?

Read the context

For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. 19Therefore anyone who sets aside one of the least of these COMMANDMENTS and teaches others accordingly will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commandmensts will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

As in the 10 commandments/the moral law


4bd59c  No.766302

>>766064

>Don't try to mimic Jesus.

>Don't follow Jesus.

Christian - noun. A follower of Jesus Christ

Go back to /pol/ rabbi


bdb643  No.766310

It's taken me years of thinking about it and constantly reading, but I think the entire point of the sermon on the mount - where most of what Jesus considers sins come from - are not so much about the actual sins but about Jesus letting everyone know that He has authority over scripture, the law, and the prophets; ergo, He is God in the flesh. He's clarifying the commands that God Himself gave unto people. God told the newly formed nation of Israel that in justice, it was an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. Jesus, however, told the people that if someone slaps them on the cheek, they should turn the other also. I think the entire sermon, including the bit on the laws and the prophets, follow this theme. Jesus said that not one word of the law will be done away until all is fulfilled - and that He came not to destroy, but to fulfill. Further, in other parts of the Gospels, He again establishes His authority over the law and essentially says that the essence of the law is to love the Lord with everything and to love neighbor as one's self.

In short, I believe that by submitting to King Jesus and letting Him be our advocate by having us take on His righteous, perfect life, as well as letting Him take the punishment for our pitiful, rebellious life, then we fulfill the law through Him. Further, it is by honoring His commandments to love the Lord with all our might and our neighbor as ourselves that we may walk with Him.


38e128  No.766316

>>766302

You are not thinking.

Before the crucifixion and resurrection, the ceremonial law had not been fulfilled. Christ fulfilled the Law, which means that sillnoracticing the old ceremonial laws is the same as telling Him that His sacrifice wasn’t enough. Stop being willful.


5afe9d  No.766389

>>766060

One comment from the video though

>Jesus once said that all things from God are good. Through Christ's death and ressurection, we are no longer under the law (Old Testament). God does not hate Gays, Lesbians, and Transgenders. Jesus ate with the leppers who were considered sinners and unclean and leprosy was God's punishment for their sins. If Jesus were to physically walk this earth today, I'm sure he would embrace me. I am a preoperative male to female transsexual and a staunch Christian. I am not an abomination to God.


33fceb  No.766392

>>766316

This. Dispensationalism.


90bf36  No.766393

>>766392

Dispensationalism is a terrible pro-kike heresy.


6cf889  No.766397

>>766389

>Interpreting Christ associating with and having mercy on lepers and sinners as Christ being pro-leprosy and pro-sin

Deviant sexuality destroys the mind as well as the spirit.


509df6  No.766415

>>766117

Thou Shalt Not Kill, anon

Are sodomites generally unclean? Of course. But so were you, before Christ entered your life. Do not forget that many of the saints, such as Augustine, Jerome, etc, lived, as the Church puts it, "loose lives" prior to their conversion (I heard once that Jerome practiced, as a young man, some of the homosexual behaviors of Roman youth - but I've never seen that cited, so it seems to be just a rumor). Convert them above all else; to kill them is to damn them forever, which isn't in your domain - if they continue in their sin, God Eternal shall damn them eternally. Protect the children, sure. But thou shalt not kill


90bf36  No.766418

>>766415

>to kill them is to damn them forever

I heard since they're reprobates who won't repent it's better to kill them early so they stop accumulating punishment in hell.


509df6  No.766425

>>766418

Well, some are reprobates, sure. But a great deal can be converted if you treat them with pity instead of the hate they are used to (especially in the United States, where prots yell at gays like Pharisees on crack). Disarm them with your pity for their sinful nature, preach to them, and maybe they repent.

If they don't, then they are reprobate, and they shall get what they get. It is a very sad thing, but it is unfortunately the eternity some poor souls choose. Still, however, it is their choice to sin, and it is your choice to sin. Again, thou shalt not kill - this is a part of the natural law. Sin cannot end sin - only Christ may do that.

>tl;dr: killing sodomites only allows them to dirty your soul. It's better to leave the reprobates alone, rather than let them make you into a reprobate

I'm not a priest, of course, and if a Church document disagrees with me, I'll be more than happy to retract this. But my understanding is that the Church is against murder in all forms (abortion, euthanasia, capital punishment, and, yes, the killing of reprobate sodomites)


912a8c  No.766429

>>766415

>thou shalt not kill (actually murder, aka kill unlawfully)

>bible is full of god himself killing sodomites or else leading the israelites to war


912a8c  No.766430

>>766425

>But a great deal can be converted if you treat them with pity instead of the hate they are used to (especially in the United States, where prots yell at gays like Pharisees on crack)

What world you live in? Faggots get endless pity, praise, gibes, and more from society right now. America is faggot paradise. Right now it's the heterosexuals in America that need pity.


509df6  No.766464

>>766429

>God killed, so I can kill

You are not God, anon. Check your heart, love thy enemy, and pray for those who sin. Always.

If God kills sodomites, that's up to Him. He is certainly strong enough to burn some stick-piles, if He so desires.

>>766430

>unironically arguing this

>unironically saying that America is the be-all of morals

>not realizing that Sodomites will get no pity, praise, or gibs in Heaven

>not understanding that you live for Heaven, not America

The absolute state of the American Prot. Pity those who sin. Heterosexuals (just call them normal people who don't participate in sodomy. Heterosexual is a scientific term used to put "heteros" and "homos" on equal footing. Sodomy is a sin; healthy sexual behavior - that is, sex between a man and his wife - is not) do not need pity from Heaven - they are doing what is right in the sight of God. Sodomites are sinning, and we should pray - out of pity for their souls - that they find salvation in Christ.

I'm not saying wear a rainbow flag or anything of that sort. If that's how you took my original comment, then I am sorry for the ambiguity. But saying "the world is evil, we should fight and overthrow it through physical means!" is literally what the Jews who rejected Christ believed. Christ came not to make things "pure" in this world, but to make us pure for the next world. We are called to pray and show Christ to the world, that all who have ears to hear the Gospel may be saved. Pity your enemy and pray.


3af347  No.766618

File: b3e3f791cb419d1⋯.png (290.2 KB, 420x423, 140:141, RareLuther.png)

>>766060

In Matthew, after Christ had finished living His life, and died on the Cross it was, at least in one sense, the fulfillment of the law, Matthew 3:15, & 26:53-56. This is what Matthew is trying to show us. So the ceremonial requirement about not eating shrimp was perfectly fulfilled in the life of Christ, and we are no longer under it.


925eea  No.768987

>>766060

>which is that onions/garlic/etc. has a chemical in it that passes the blood-brain barrier, and makes your brain foggy

Damn wut I've literally been eating like 100g of raw sliced onion couple nights each week for idk months, had no idea about this chemical, my brain is screwed and foggy due to poor sleep too much computer and porn and half time poor diet (the other half actually quite good) but always thought raw onions were v good for you, and also saw the meme about rats fed raw onion getting super big gonads as a result of diet or something..i've never noticed feeling foggy directly after eating them, i eat it with salmon and avacado and bread and lemon and few other veggies

>and plan on doing an experiment of living by Jesus's word alone

Can fall into some traps with this, can't remember the name of it but there's a yt channel which is just animations/presentations on topics which emphasise the words and teachings of Jesus over everything else, voiced by a guy known as 'Voice,' but they're actually part of and use the vids as a kind of intro/rabit hole(/arguably for grooming/recruitment) into a small cult, can't remember there name either lol but you'll maybe come across them if you're a prot and researching/watching on yt


67822d  No.769039

>>766065

>Synchronicity like crazy

anon, this is how it works. It took me a very long time in life to realize that literally God literally exists. Prayer is super important. And that is not synchronicity , that is important for you. And more than that…Everything is important for you…at least that’s shat I’m really starting to think. Which is why sin is so weird and bad. Those are things I’m doing and then I get off message and out of communication with prayer and it’s my own fault and I stop being able to hear/see “synchronicities” for a while…until I go back to God again and then recognize the next one when it comes again, etc etc. Still figuring it out. I used to think I was just being crazy, until I heard about how many other people had similar experiences. Imo people sort of have this and don’t recognize it for what it is and then don’t pursue or listen to it and it fades …but all of that makes sense if you think of it as YOUR spirit and Jesus literally teaching YOU.

Also fyi I’m pretty new to this all, so ignore me if that’s heretical or you have good reason to think I’m wrong about that or something.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / choroy / dempart / fascist / jenny / klpmm / komica / leftyb / lounge ]