>>758619
>God somehow creates meaning
LOL that's ez
Since we cannot examine the domain of the creator, let's pick two universes, one which is meta of the other, in the most detached way.
Axiomatically starting from experience, which I am doing right now and against which no argument can be built, define real as the universe of what can directly or indirectly experienced.
Then let's define a banal universe like the tic tac toe game. It is a set of rules, with a set of parameters, with a set of games containing a set of moves. You can play it in your head, which underlines a general fact, games are abstractions so they are completely separate from reality. So we have two abstractions, this universe and the game, very loosely coupled.
Now, you run into a representation of the game. If you know the game, you know what it is, if you dunno, the representation is as arcane as the phaistos disc (which itself could well be a game). So, what gives meaning to what you see? the fact that somebody in a meta universe (ours) created the game and transmitted the knowledge to you.
If you insist in seeing this theologically, Christ is God in this universe, it is like you in your dream. You may be part of the dream like another character, but in truth the dream is inside you and you are inside the dream. John says all things were done through him, calling it the Logos, which protestants merely translate as word, but it is better translated as… "meaning". It is regarded as mysterious, but frankly guys with enough experience of virtual vs real should just nod the head and say 'it figures'. Then, you can believe or not, that is another matter.