[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / animu / fascist / fast / mde / sw / vg / vichan ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? the Lord is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?

File: 9c38eea9155ae93⋯.jpg (1.34 MB, 1612x1966, 806:983, Cesareborgia.jpg)

e59311  No.749438

What do if you had to become the law?

I think we can all agree God always comes first but I'm not talking about those kind of situations were you have to hide some jews from the gestapo and no violence is ever needed

>inb4 holohoax, just pretend it happened

In my opinion if we know of any grave immoral crime, and are capable of stopping it, we should always strive to do so in the "best" possible way, (keep in mind this shouldn’t be an attempt to punish but prevent)

I think we would all agree the "best" way is always the one with less violence and same “stopping power”

For example

If you're about to witness a rape…

>you can't call the police because that would take to long, i.e no stopping power

>so you should try and stop it by letting the rapist know you’re a witness, start recording with your phone, flash your gun etc. (And hold him until police arrive)

>If he still shows signs that he's going to go on with it, you should attack him

>If you don’t feel capable of holding him down (say he’s twice your size) then lethal force should be used.

But then I ran this logic with abortions and…

>Can’t call police

>Can’t non-violently stop it

>Therefore the “best” option would seem to be to cut their right thumb off so they can’t carry out abortions anymore

Social repercussions should be accounted for of course, killing the gestapo officer could save people but there would be reprisals, and we should also consider other more peaceful alternatives that tackle the same problem (try and convince doctors and uncertain pregnant women of the value of life). But even so, given they perform an average of 3-8 monthly abortions (allegedly), violence seems justified and even necessary, even though cutting thumbs doesn’t feel very Christian, what should you do if you find yourself in a similar position?

I would also like to know what /christian/ thinks about how to handle less grave crimes which still lead to plenty of tragedy and that the law enforcement, out of corruption, bureaucracy, political immunity or otherwise, aren’t enforcing i.e. banking usury, drug trafficking, money laundering and the like

06e505  No.749447

>>749438

Take fetuses and hide them in your basement to keep the gestapo from murdering them?

>cut off their right thumb

No.


5a905a  No.749449

>>749447

… this

What ever God's wrath is, remember he is the Just Judge, and they will get to know his temper.


30d091  No.749453

All man-made laws are invalid before God.


e59311  No.749462

>>749447

>remember he is the Just Judge

Yes I know but this applies more to the people that shouldn't have gotten away with it but have, and not an excuse for us to look the other way

I thought our father expected us to do whatever was in our power to stop heinous acts, even use (the least amount of) violence, from there comes the concept of just war, I'm struggling to find good reason as to why cutting those peoples' thumbs off is immoral as that would seem to stop the crime and not involve that much violence or greatly damage our movement of criminalizing abortion

thoughts?


e59311  No.749464


5a905a  No.749469

>>749462

>I thought our father expected us to do whatever was in our power to stop heinous acts, even use (the least amount of) violence, from there comes the concept of just war, I'm struggling to find good reason as to why cutting those peoples' thumbs off is immoral as that would seem to stop the crime and not involve that much violence or greatly damage our movement of criminalizing abortion

That's honestly Islam method thinking.

Just because we have the truth of the gospel doesn't mean we can impose it upon others. Yeah, we should condemn them and be vocal, yeah we need and should stand in the way of misdeeds that fall upon humanity.

But we are to be set apart from them. To abuse another mans free will as to punish him severely in a grotesque manner is barbaric and appalling.

We are not their judge, we are merely their jailor if even that.

We cannot impose the Faith onto them just as God does not impose it onto us.

Pray for their repentance, pray and God's justice will be swift and mighty.


77f857  No.749499

>>749438

I understand that violence is not something to be glorified, but I don't see why it should be frowned upon either. God will violently punish the wicked, plenty of violence was committed in the old testament at the command of God himself, and Jesus even resorted to violence when the jews defiled the temple with their corruption.

If you ask me, committing violence against those who practice abortion is perfectly fine, you are after all trying to protect an innocent child's life. If you happened upon somebody trying to kill a 5 year old kid in a back alley or something, you wouldn't try to 'convince them of the value of life', you'd either stop them yourself or get somebody who can stop them (call the police). Whichever you choose, violence is ultimately the solution.

It may help to think of violence in the same way you think of sex. Sex just for pleasure between complete strangers is degenerate and sinful, but sex between a married couple for the purpose of raising children is a wonderful thing.


e59311  No.749500

>>749469

>Abuse another mans free will

That's what I thought at first, we can do something so long as we don't infringe on the dignity or free will of the other, but personal liberty clearly stops when someone chooses to murder doesn't it?

and all societies seem to agree, if violence is the only way, what then?

>Islam method of thinking

>Impose faith upon others

That's not what I'm proposing, I never intended to punish the perpetrator just prevent the grave crimes he commits unto others, emphasis on "grave" and "others", a "jailor" like you say

I don't want to hurt them either but it seems maiming is the only way of saving 8 lives


4c917b  No.749501

The correct translation of the 5th commandment is “Thou Shall Not MURDER.” Some killing is sanctioned, either directly by God or indirectly by his administrators (those writing government legislation, who the bible tells us were appointed by God). This is why killing is allowed in war - it’s sanctioned by thise in power.

It is true that Christians are not to get abortions as per pur administrators (in the church). However, because it was sanctioned by the U.S, government, it is not up to us Christians to attack abortion doctors for performing legl killing. We must instead be the light of the word, and be a positive influence


71c0da  No.749503

>>749500

>I don't want to hurt them either but it seems maiming is the only way of saving 8 lives

You have gotten answers already, continuing this line of thinking is unhealthy for you as a Christian individually and for the community as a whole.


76b864  No.749504

>>749500

Ok, first of all, you're advocating criminal violence against another human being. Second of all, cutting off someone's thumb doesn't really prevent anything.


e59311  No.749509

>>749504

>>749503

I'll stop debating and look more into this, but finding a moral ground is not unhealthy

>cutting someone's thumb doesn't do anything

Have you tried doing anything without your dominant hands' thumb? Roman soldiers used to cut their thumbs off so they would get dismissed (they couldn't hold a sword)


71c0da  No.749511

>>749509

You are not on the moral ground.

We are telling you this. Your pursuit is apparently vain and prideful, this is not Holy avenue you are going in with this fullheadedness.


76b864  No.749512

>>749509

We live in an age where any limb can be replaced by a highly effective prosthetic. We're not Muslims. We don't live in the 7th century.


77f857  No.749521

File: 119476ca85ba75c⋯.jpg (98.07 KB, 396x382, 198:191, 1519564020.jpg)

>>749512

>literal current year argument


e59311  No.749548

>>749511

>vain and prideful

Don't assume my intentions, I would pray for that man, for I inflicted pain onto him, I would even pay for his medical bills

Present real arguments

>>749512

Still wouldn't cut it for a surgeon


76b864  No.749551

>>749521

>I have no argument and I must meme

>>749548

>for a surgeon

Perhaps, but there are thousands of surgeons in line behind the one whose thumb you just cut off. So, you go to prison for aggravated assault and the abortion gets done anyway.


642f72  No.749561

The basic premise of self defense applies to defense of others

If you live in such a dystopian country that doesn't allow lethal force to stop a rape you should leave fast

>>749453

Boring maxim

God instituted human systems for justice


76b864  No.749577

>>749561

>defense of others

That doesn't apply to the unborn child of a woman seeking an abortion. Not in the US, anyway.


001dd1  No.749578

File: 295a9a63b9c38cc⋯.webm (7.68 MB, 1920x1080, 16:9, theyll_do_it_themselves.webm)

>>749462

>people that shouldn't have gotten away with it

psalm 10 13 : "why does the wicked man spurn god, assuring himself 'he will not make me pay"?'

do you really think they're getting away with anything?

we must evangelize the truth, and i do think that involves influencing the state we reside in. have 15 children. the son does what the father taught him.

it is as you say:

>god always comes first

we will follow to the law until it breaks a more powerful law (laws given to us by god). are you the one sacrificing children? no. are we guilty of the kings sins? no. do we encourage the king to do what's right? yes.


e59311  No.749586

>>749551

>thousands of surgeons are still available

Maybe, but at least you buy the kiddos some time until they're recognized as humans and it's not like clinics are fast food restaurants, there are only a handful per state

Besides, that's flawed logic, it's obviously to make it harder

>why criminalize abortions, if women want to abort they'll do it anyways

>>749578

>do you really think they're getting away with anything?

What I meant was that there are some that take the will of God as Karma, I never proposed punishment, like I have said before, only prevention


001dd1  No.749588

>>749586

do you take god's justice to be something similar to karma?

god has always let us do what we want to do AFTER he has told us what we SHOULD do.

god does not prevent the wicked from committing sin.

god does judge the wicked accordingly.


76b864  No.749592

>>749586

>at least you buy the kiddos some time

Not really.

>cut of Dr Smith's thumb

>Dr Jones steps up within 5 minutes

Not a lot of time. Do you understand how medicine works?


642f72  No.749609

>>749577

Agreed that it's an injustice


e59311  No.749620

>>749588

>no capital G on God

>uses PUNCTUATION to STRESS a point

>thinks he sounds smart by using the same sentence starter

Read my posts again, and if you have time, the Vatican document on just wars

You'll find I don't disagree with you on anything

>>749592

I see where you're coming from, the American abortion industry has been systematized gg

But it still seems this kind of approach could be moral if the situation just becomes more practical

>be Cuban

>there's just a bunch of over demanded state run abortion clinics

>not free to protest

In this case maiming the surgeon would make a difference, save some lives

What then?


76b864  No.749621

>>749620

There is nothing moral about violently maiming another human being.


cb410c  No.749623

>>749621

But what if doing so ment saving countless other lives?


76b864  No.749625

>>749623

If you can prove that cutting off one doctor's thumb will save lives, then I suppose you might have an argument; but I guarantee you that cutting off someone's thumb doesn't save anyone.


cb410c  No.749634

File: a78e6835459c266⋯.gif (7.81 MB, 506x284, 253:142, 1536622658_Joshua.gif)

>>749625

Well, I was thinking the whole (and both) hands it's more practical. Chopping off just the thumb banks off of fear only which won't work as much

Let's say, a vigilante chopped off a known abortionist's hands. Said abortionist can no longer give abortions. It also sends a message to other abortionists to end their practice, least they suffer the same fate. Ending abortionists' murderous practices would save countless children from death.

>why not just pull his medical liscense?

It won't stop rich degenerates from paying the abortionist to perform an illegal abortion.

>why not put him to death?

Though it is MORE practical than chopping off hands, it prevents the abortionist the oppertunity to ask God for forgiveness and repent twords Him.

>are you sure thats a Christian thing to do?

Which is more unchristian? Commiting a crime to save lives or sitting idly by while someone murders babies?


76b864  No.749636

>>749634

Geeze … you really want to slice up people … I will pray for you.


cb410c  No.749638

>>749636

Geeze…your sloth really wants to allow babies to be murdered…I'll pray for you.


76b864  No.749639

>>749638

I don't want anyone to be murdered. ANYONE … including people who you personally want to be murdered.


001dd1  No.749640

>>749620

was my punctuation unclear or blasphemous?

you mentioned karma vaguely, and i wasn't sure what you thought about it. you say you don't disagree with me on anything, yet you "never proposed punishment". does not judgement come in the form of punishment?

>2322 From its conception, the child has the right to life. Direct abortion, that is, abortion willed as an end or as a means, is a "criminal" practice (GS 27 § 3), gravely contrary to the moral law. The Church imposes the canonical penalty of excommunication for this crime against human life.

you would not only be preventing abortion doctors from sacrificing children, you would be punishing and judging them for their crimes.

>2309 The strict conditions for legitimate defense by military force require rigorous consideration. The gravity of such a decision makes it subject to rigorous conditions of moral legitimacy. At one and the same time:

>- the damage inflicted by the aggressor on the nation or community of nations must be lasting, grave, and certain;

>- all other means of putting an end to it must have been shown to be impractical or ineffective;

>- there must be serious prospects of success;

>- the use of arms must not produce evils and disorders graver than the evil to be eliminated. The power of modem means of destruction weighs very heavily in evaluating this condition.

i suppose if you kept to these, the Church wouldn't have a problem with it. looks pretty strict, desu.


cb410c  No.749646

File: 3212ab9de1fa639⋯.jpg (27.3 KB, 550x442, 275:221, fp,550x550,black,off_white….jpg)

>>749639

Now you are being disingenuous and bearing false witness. I stated I don't want abortionists to be murdered as it would prevent them the oppertunity to repent twords God.

Try actually reading my post before you get overly emotional, friend.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / animu / fascist / fast / mde / sw / vg / vichan ]