>>753023
>Often of the names of their gods and godesses that they're trying to invoke, correct?
Not entirely, there is no invoking involved, search for the mantras and you will see what their meaning.
Also the very own concept of God differs from our own, most of the west thinks of god as a active entity, where as in the east its more like the embodiment of an idea or concept.
>Spoopy stuff, do you have a link/source?
Sure, here it is brother, I got this because of some old movie I saw as teenager about the subject, still not sure if this was it but its pretty close.
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:0bb97a99cdf6978dc8c1e1d7ed6ca7e2672c3c16&dn=BBC.The.Life.of.Buddha.DivX5.AC3.www.mvgroup.org.avi&tr=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mvgroup.org%3A2710%2Fannounce
>See, I would be interested in trying to understand their perspective on this - we as Christians would think it proper to react negatively to such indicident, due to it being evil trying to tempt us into sin - but in the east they champion indifference?
Not at all you got the wrong idea, its difference per se, but not giving them power. Even in christianity, a big point of it is for us to accept ourselves as sinners, part of our essence, to acknowledge that we may never rid of it entirely but must ask for forgiveness and repent. To me this comes very close to realizing our inner demons of desires (that are essentially sins) and that they are ever so present and in some form or another end up being source of our greatest afflictions. Realize that passion and hate and extremes opposites of the same coin, being in essence the same thing, so by hating on your sins you may actually give it strength.
>but then you either a) start to or need to desire to stop desiring, entailing a contradiction or b) literally eliminate all desire (somehow) in which case you won't care about anything anyway, including seeking to eliminate desire and obtaining enlightenment? And so it defeats the point? But then it seems eastern philosophy seems to revel in these types of conundrums as a fantastic mystery of reality rather than something to be seen as posing an actual contradiction and something to be resolved. I'm not especially learned so I don't know if thats an outright mischaracterisation but that's the impression I get from everything I've seen so far.
You're not entirely wrong, one of the realizations of enlightenment is understanding that we might never get to it, we can get close but never achieve godliness, at least not while alive. And such is the way in most eastern religions, they resolve their teachings around philosophy and mind conundrums. If you want to learn more I advise to check up on Allan Watts, he had books and audio lectures where he does just that, presenting the philosophy of zen buddhism to the western christian perspective.
Note too that I still value christianity above it all, in my point of view it provides a much more direct approach to salvation, even when sometimes to bible can seem cryptic.
And I also value the church, realizing that its a human institution, but one that goal is to provide community, order, discipline and doctrine, and to spread the word of God in a seemingly chaotic world. And that's another point, why do we have daily mass? And I think its to keep us reminded of his word, to always beg for forgiveness and hope we are not set astray from our paths.