[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / arepa / cafechan / htg / leftpol / newbrit / pinoy / vg ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? the Lord is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?

File: 78e665e9f6c0342⋯.jpg (61.38 KB, 500x364, 125:91, 1532016881671.jpg)

5d8fee  No.734259

To be honest I've never really considered them, but a secular friend of mine sprung it on me. He's a very careful listener and doesn't rush to conclusions or I wouldn't have brought up religion at all with him. My faith is very new still, so I haven't thought about everything.

The thing is, I've long since ruled out rationalism, and I've also ruled out fideism. This is awkward, because then angels are a logical trap as far as I can see; I can't just accept them on faith alone without good reasons because that would be heretical, but rationalizing them away is equally dissatisfying and secular. If I apply pure rationalism to the question of angels, then I walk back on faith, but my faith has improved everything so much, and rationalism has proven so false that I cannot return to it.

I don't think it's necessary to have a completely confident argument about angels, nevertheless, I need help.

10ad0b  No.734260

File: 48c301941509fe7⋯.jpg (36.08 KB, 317x499, 317:499, 51EkmqALnAL._SX315_BO1,204….jpg)


5d8fee  No.734263

>>734260

Insights, not books, I don't have the time.


10ad0b  No.734266

>>734263

You said you don't believe they exist. So you need evidence, not vague insights. If you're too lazy or preoccupied to study (and that book would hardly qualify as a real study, it's a very short overview) then just accept their existence on faith.


9e21f7  No.734267

>>734259

Trusting the testimony of scripture without additional evidence is not heresy. The scripture is self authenticating, and as such it is your authority in all that it affirms.

But there is evidence for angels in the experiences of men and women all over the globe. Not only Christians, but other religions also talk about spiritual beings appearing as men.


5d8fee  No.734270

>>734267

Thank you for your actually helpful comment. The thing is that they haven't "cropped up" spiritually for me personally. I of course believe that spiritual beings have had occasion to communicate with certain privileged people, such as Jacob, Abraham, Ezekiel and so on.

I just hadn't given angels any thought beyond this.


9e21f7  No.734271

>>734260

T O L L H O U S E S

O

L

L

H

O

U

S

E

S


10ad0b  No.734272

>>734271

lol you don't have to believe in the toll houses, but it's a good overview of experiences with supernatural beings and post mortem states from both secular and religious sources.


5d8fee  No.734273

>>734272

Ok, I'll go read it


9e21f7  No.734275

>>734270

Yeah man we take other people's word about their experiences all the time unless we have reason to discount it. And in the case of angels we have more than sufficient reason to think they are trustworthy, and that, given God's own existence, it's highly probable that He would create such beings.

>>734272

I know, I just couldn't let the opportunity pass by kek.


e24ceb  No.734276

>>734259

Once you have evidence that Christianity in particular is true, you can take the existence of angels on the authority of the Bible. You don't NEED to prove everything about Christianity individually so long as you can prove the whole.

That said, medieval philosophers like Aquinas did endeavor to prove that angels existed, so you might look into some of their arguments. More recently, though, angels have been largely passed over by popular Christian philosophy. I don't know any good arguments in favor of their existence myself, and I expect that that's true of the majority of Christians. I'd agree with the other guy in the thread: if you want evidence, you'll have to dig a little.


5d8fee  No.734280

File: ea80ab6b6f0d2eb⋯.png (137.34 KB, 204x247, 204:247, BeatificVision.png)

>>734276

Yes, but why stop there? I've been reading St Thomas Aquinas on this and I'm finding it interesting; It comports very well with what I believe God to be like rather than the depictions of angels in art which seem ridiculous.

Based on my cursory glance at the Summa, I'm thinking of angels more as a descending hierarchy of creatures; more like pic related.


f673d7  No.734292

File: e58dfed9f6d0cd1⋯.jpg (7.78 KB, 276x183, 92:61, e58.jpg)


cb8373  No.734302

>>734259

Watch fr ripperger vids about demons on YouTube. He's an old rite exorcist and has encountered hundreds of demons


cb8373  No.734303

>>734271

Funnily enough toll houses is also a catholic doctrine although which specifically being called toll houses


10ad0b  No.734304

>>734303

Yes, it's actually mentioned in the book.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / arepa / cafechan / htg / leftpol / newbrit / pinoy / vg ]