>>729800
>Why do people say Christianity is a weak religion?
Basically nietzsche. he proposes that our religion is one founded on the passive-aggressive mentality of a bunch of slaves who had to invent afterlife narratives and a god who cares about and takes revenge for people, since slaves can't actually take revenge or live actually good lives in material reality.
>Why is it that Christianity is mocked the most out of all of the religions?
Real reason: because satan hates it and is the lord of the earth.
historically observable reason: christianity is the religion of the nobility and feudal society. in the 1650s, with the invention of volley fire, the merchant class (and I mean that literally, not as a word for jews) was able to begin the process of usurping the nobility. the rest of history is literally just the merchant class tearing down every vestige of the ancien regime that kept them from freely exploiting people for profit. religion is one of those vestiges, and now that we're in the absurdity of late capitalism and negative utilitarianism, merchants need it torn down posthaste, since it's stifling the project to depopulate the labor aristocracy in core nations in order to facilitate exploitation of peripheral labor without labor violence in the core on account of high unemployment there. ergo: corporate media attacks it and brainwashes the public against it because christianity stifles profit margin.
>These same people that say Christianity is a religion for weak doormats are the same ones that would squeal bloody murder and run away if Christianity was actually in full effect.
sure, and you can see this pretty clearly if you debate atheists on both sides of the political spectrum.
atheists on /pol/:
>why won't christianity let me enslave blacks?
atheists on /r/christianity:
>why does christianity promote slavery?
it's profoundly stupid, or rather illustrative of atheism's profound stupidity.