/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

Competitive eating serves no purpose than the glorification of gluttony and consumer culture, both of which are evil.

I hope this is a joke (OP) why on earth would this be a sin?

>the virgin competitive eater

>not the chad competitive faster

Yes

Yes because it would go against the virtues of temperance and humility.

>>727812

What if I give the prize money to charity?

>Gluttony.

The most overlooked deadly sin and yet the most tampant in America

>>727827

Nah, English schoolchildren have us beat for that now.

>>727809

I don’t think it really counts as gluttony so long as you don’t take it too far to where it bleeds over too much into your daily life.

>>727832

>muh personal definition of sin

Gluttony is everything that you don't need but eat it anyway because it feels so good/whatever other justification.

it's very likely that it's a sin, but it's absolutely and certainly completely retarded and gross and symptomatic of our degenerated consumer culture. why don't you do something else competitively? you know, something that isn't vile.

>>727809

>be competetive eater

>win competitions by eating garbage food

>use prize money to feed the poor and orphans

It's not like there's any food shortage in the modern world. Distribution is what's the cause of all those problems.

Gluttony is more of an indulgence at the disregard of others in greater need.

>>727839

>implying there aren't better ways to earn money.

You just want to stuff yourself.

>>727834

Wow, what a shitty definition. Stop eating ice cream and sweets then

>>727853

>some holier-than-thou creationist idiot

Wtwtp does that have to do with what he said? Hahahaha

>>727855

One implication same as the other.

>>727849

>B-but my pleasure.

>somehow this is a justification for your bad eatin habits

You can enjoy food anon, but you shouldn't eat more than you NEED.

>B-but no-one needs ice cream and sweets

Those are food products as well which means its okay to eat them if they happen to be the food that is available, but yes, you should avoid indulging yourself. Ice cream is bad for you, this is a known fact.

>>727857

That explains absolutely nothing.

>Maybe don’t eat a ton and make money a different way

<Ugh, CREATIONISTS

>>727859

>>B-but my pleasure.

>Pleasure is always bad, you should be mutilating and flogging yourself like shiites on ashura

>>Ice cream is bad for you, this is a known fact.

>Believing retarded dietologists

>"I have read on British medical journal that eating pork causes cancer!"

Also, you missed the point. The wording itself in your posts were awful. Though this thread is moronic anyways. The question in OP shouldnt be even asked in the first place, the answer is quite obvious. But awful threads have become a norm in these days, as I see. If only I had more patience and willpower to leave this site already…

Yes, while its probably not gluttony, it's a total waste of food.

>>727873

>while its probably not gluttony, it's a total waste of food.

Isn't "total waste of food" gluttony?

>>727826

You know secondary actions like that don't enter into the equation. If I could save the life of a child by prostituting myself SOMEHOW, it would still be a sin, and there probably would be a alternative way of going about it anyways.

>>727826

Vid related couldn't find the real clip

>>727878

Is throwing out clothes gluttony?

>>727809

Gluttony