>>724086
><He has never talked with Eastern-Europeans
As an actual eastern euro, i feel obliged to intervene.
Our press is just as jackal-like, and loves shitting on the Church(the EO is the main target here) for pretty much anything, so any juicy tale of church corruption and sex scandals will be a boufet for them.
As an almost 25yo, here are the ecclesiastical sex scandals i can remember in my lifetime:
>2 monks probably did it in the butt(they said he was massaging his bones, but whatever);
>a couple of nuns got pregnant;
>ONE pedo priest case;
As for the last one, the media had a field day, dragged that fiasco for 2/3rds of a year, and beat it to death, due to how rare it was, while the Church immediately dropped that priest like a hot potato.
Now, i'm sure those aren't the only ones that have happened, and we also have more financially corrupt clergy than you guys, but sex-wise, we have way less of a problem than you, and retarded CIDF "our boy-rape rates are at normal levels, citizen" apologetics are insane.
The Roman Church def. has a problem with pedo priests, and they need to accept it.
It happened even before the Schism, and God sent you/us St. Peter Damian that fought against this plague.
Medieval rule books also have massively restrictive rules on priest-boy interactions precisely to avoid this shit.
So man up, and accept your issues.