>>711212
>Everything a pope does is infallible guys.
The only people who believe that are cultural Catholic grey haired old ladies. If it's not a careful pronouncement on upholding Christian tradition (ie: "muh ex catherdra" as you'd likely put it) then it has about as much weight as a midget in a tossing contest.
For example, any Catholic can say without issue that the Pope's preferred method for immigrant charity is out to lunch. No problem at all with it. Or if the Pope says to fix an old wooden chair that you have to "replace the solenoids", you can smile and escort him to a place to rest while you get a hammer to put new nails in the chair's leg.
Likewise it is also licit under particular circumstances to suggest the Pope resign, as Cardinal Burke has recently said. Even via Wikipedia you can find instances of people screaming at Popes; for example modernists were right in Paul VI's face with bulging veins as soon as Humane Vitae dropped. Nowadays traditionalists are more measured otherwise but are nearly openly dismissive of Francis.
So, no, this "infallible in all circumstances thing" is a complete myth generated by people inside and outside the Roman sphere who have a tendency to gloss over details. Its makes about sense with any serious research as conflating IFB autism over the "KJV Bible = God Himself" as being 1:1 with sola scriptura.