>>705719
I find it likely that the Acts 8 group was similar to the Acts 19 group. They hadn't been given the triune baptism commanded by Christ (Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost), and as such did not have the Holy Spirit. You see in 8:16 it says they were only baptized in the name of Jesus, and so the apostles had to lay hands on them for them to receive the Holy Ghost. Now look at a similar story in Acts 19
>And it came to pass, that, while Apollos was at Corinth, Paul having passed through the upper coasts came to Ephesus: and finding certain disciples,
>He said unto them, Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not so much as heard whether there be any Holy Ghost.
>And he said unto them, Unto what then were ye baptized? And they said, Unto John's baptism.
>Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus.
>When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
>And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them; and they spake with tongues, and prophesied.
>And all the men were about twelve.
I see a definite parallel in the story. Baptism in the apostolic churches is given in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. The priest baptizers are also successors of the apostles. So in this story, people not baptized in the name of the Holy Spirit did not have the Holy Spirit. I think that's all that's going on