[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / acme / animu / arepa / caffe / film / mde / omnichan / vichan ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? the Lord is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?

File: 84927ad389ebd08⋯.jpg (115.85 KB, 1920x1191, 640:397, soldier kissing rosary.jpg)

92f4cd  No.696491

I really want to participate in the TLM but the SSPX is the only place I can afford to drive to every sunday. Should I continue going to Novos ordo because of their irregular status

5922a2  No.696495

>>696491

>I really want to participate in the TLM

Why?


622f66  No.696500

>should I apostise over an aesthetic preference

Do you really need to ask this


a13722  No.696522

>>696500

The point of link related is to explain the problem with the term "sedevacantism," but I think it also does a better job of explaining the position than anything else I've seen. The current Pope and cardinals are wicked men. They've invited heresy and scandal upon the church and given into modernist cuckery at every turn. At this point, some guy in Kansas could have as legitimate a claim to authority as the current church hierarchy. It's a thoroughly unpleasant state of affairs, but until the stables are cleaned, the only thing we can do is combat the evil agenda of these men as much as possible.

http://dashjr.org/catholic/sedevacantist.php


d352be  No.696525

>>696500

going to a sspx mass isnt apostasy only if he starts adhering to their position do things become abit iffy


d352be  No.696528

>>696522

no-one brought up sedevacantism


622f66  No.696536

>>696522

You are as "catholic" as any other schismatic sect.

>>696525

True, probably not apostasy. However it's definitely against canon law, a sin against the Church, and borderline schism.


367b29  No.696537

>>696491

This was discussed 2 days ago in the Catholic general. All SSPX sacraments are valid and their masses fulfill Sunday obligation. Just as you would skip your closest Novus Ordo parish and go to a more reverent one that is further.

>>696495

Because it's the mass of our ancestors, because there is no liturgical abuse, because it's beautiful. There are many reasons.


3e6878  No.696561

>>696536

>However it's definitely against canon law, a sin against the Church

Are you serious?




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / acme / animu / arepa / caffe / film / mde / omnichan / vichan ]