>>681909
When people talk about a "one world religion" they're talking about a religion which has been contrived by the powerful in order to subdue and control the world, not about every nation being called to confess the truth of Christ's death and resurrection. In this way it also ties into schemes for one world government, and that "One people, One world" might actually be a central part of the creed of some hypothetical one world religion, in order to extinguish and destroy the concept of the nation-state. I hope I don't have to explain why this bad from a Christian perspective (see revelations), or even just the perspective of someone who isn't an asocial bug man.
so basically this >>681923