>>677928
>Is cryptocurrency a good solution to usury as practiced by central banks?
No, reestablishing anti-usury laws as God proscribes is the only good solution.
>Or would crypto qualify as 'unjust weights and measures'?
What exactly is backing-up crypto? A near stable supply of a valuable good like gold? Lashes on the stake? Full faith and credit? If it's not backed-up with something you can have and hold, it's a highly volatile and high risk currency. One day you give crypto say worth $100 to buy something. The next day, crypto could become next to worthless because some butt injected something screwy in the ecosystem overnight and nobody wants the crypto anymore. Or people make one crypto worthless because they chase another meme-currency to get rich quick like those who involved themselves in Bitcoin early on. That is an unjust measure.
Sure, there can manageable fluctuations within an long-term equilibrium with a proper currency (btw the US Dollar is not a decent currency form), but that's the thing, you need an equilibrium for fluctuations to occur without the market blowing up on itself. You don't get that with crypto.
>>677931
Gary North is a joke, and not just for the Y2K incident. He's buddy-buddy with the (((Mises Institute))), thinks you can scam God out of money if you invest in the stock market, and promotes usury. He is the reason Christian Reconstruction died as a movement and why theonomy is struggling.
Seriously, did you the eulogy for his son? It reads like a lament from a French existential agnostic, rather than from a Christian filled with hope with the presence of God after death and of the resurrection.