>>676057
It would give no concrete result, without human scholarship, I think. Because there is the issue of what the authors of the Bible meant, and I don't know if an AI could reach a conclusion without looking at what scholarship has to say.
If scholars are also analyzed… then the answer would be "none" probably, because no church in existence today is a copy-paste of the New Testament communities and the late 1st-early 2nd century communities.
Churches that use the model of a single bishop as leader of a church, rather than a college of priests, would be rejected, as well as churches that don't do baptism for the dead (a practice mentionned by Paul in 1 Corinthians, neither positively nor negatively), and so on…
If there is a result anyway, I guess I would be curious to see the AI's reasonment behind picking its choice, and I might entertain it, but if I'm not convinced by it I'm not going to listen to the AI anyway just because it's smarter than me.
The problem is that, if development of doctrine is taken into account, and so the Church Fathers, the history of the Church, the councils, etc. are taken into account as well, then I think the AI would struggle. Neither Catholicism or Orthodoxy portrays the fullness of the pre-schism traditions, due to the diversity that was lost with the schism.
I'd be more curious to have an AI try to figure out how to solve the schism without compromise of dogma for either side.