>>673956
the source is the old testament, anon. look at all the interbreeding with the people of the land - whom they were supposed to destroy - took place. even after the captivity and return there were times when they still did this and had to put away the wives and kids, see nehemiah and ezra, but far before that, from the time after solomon died, most of the genealogies include people of the land.
take a look at Jesus' earthly genealogy and just note how many gentiles were in it; rahab, ruth, etc.
ruth is a good example of this, taking place well after the time of the judges. she's a moabitess, and married boaz and had kids with him. it's remarkably common and easy to see that the genetic stock which came out of egypt was obviously diluted and changed from the original by the time in the land.
personally i prefer to think of them as canaanites, because that's what they are geneticially in large part, and that's what they are in worship practice today, talmudism is essentially canaanite paganism.
of course the ashkenazi are part sicicilian, and the sephardim are part spanish and moorish, etc.
now the guy you're replying to (i'm not him) is probably thinking about the khazar hypothesis, which i'm not a proponent of, but there is that to be considered as well. converts to judaism were extremely common even in the time of Christ and the Apostles, they're mentioned in Acts extensively, it was only some time after that the jews clamped down on that.