you have to learn to argue on their level. they're always easy to stump and infuriate themselves. you shouldn't always argue respectfully on their terms, that is casting pearls before swine. they do not understand or have the ability to respect it. you have to give the swine what it needs, slop.
these idiotic "atheists" have literally no answer to what they would consider proof of God. they a priori determine there can be no proof ever possible to satisfy it and then say that there is no evidence. just ask any fedora to give you any scenario of what they would consider sufficient proof of God, anything at all. they literally can give you nothing.
for example: you can ask, if i said look outside right now and your name would be written in the sky, would that be sufficient proof for you? if they say, yeah that would convince me that there is a God, they're an idiot, you would just reply and say what is more likely, that I can communicate with the all powerful God, or just advanced aliens who can do this. by their fedora logic they have to conclude aliens. similarly they could say oh well if x,y,z happened etc, then that would be good. you could say isn't it more likely that you took a powerful drug and was hallucinating? many times people forget that they have even taken the drug if they're on a strong trip. clearly that is more likely than there being an all powerful deity trying to communicate with you right, according you le occams razor (named after william of ockham, a catholic friar, oh dear me). etc, hopefully you get the point, they literally cannot come up with anything based on their "LOGIC AND FACTS", literally no scenario at all that could ever according to them to prove that there was a God.
this in itself proves how retarded their position is. they a priori believe there is no God because that's their "preference" and reason anyway they can to that. they will accept zero evidence. they cannot even conceive of any evidence that they will accept.