>>667764
>Having an opinion contrary to mine is bearing false witness
How about you just stop being a prick? Just skimmed through that link, and at number 10 "Strong on restrictions on free speech" they literally use a quote of him defending censure against criticism of other religions because "All religions recognize the sanctity of human life" (only very slightly paraphrased). So literally defending hate speech laws to protect mohammedan demon worshippers, quite the ardent traditionalist there. Maybe you shouldn't use a 'proof' with such utterly feeble misinterpretations of his quotes when you accuse other people of being dishonest.
Since I don't have the patience to read any more of that drivel about what he's "strong" on, based on poorly interpreted quotes (which you certainly could find contradictory quotes for), why don't I list what I think he's weak on?
1) The urgent call that the Church has for converting all people to the one true faith (and I mean urgent, not a mealy-mouthed platitude in support of Church teaching while not compromising ecumenism)
2) The right of the nation state to control immigration to their country and preserve their own unique people and culture
3) Opposing the corporate NGO globohomo superstructure and the legion of evils it works in the world (this is a big one, whatever else he says, if he's on good terms with them, then he is enabling the greatest organizational tool Satan has on earth)
Show me a strong public endorsement of any of these positions, or condemnation of their opposite (which don't depend on dubious quotes and Talmudic parsing), then I'll eat my hat, and never criticize papa Frankie again.