>>665129
He basically reads as a massive conspiracy theorist, has very rigid and self-righteous tone, but whats more important is that he actually concentrates quite less on actual theology, unlike authors listed in OP.
Of course, he also has nice works here and there, particular refuting eastern garbage like hinduism (but at the same time propagating gnostic garbage such as toll houses in other)
But in general, not a great theologian. Lossky concentrates on actual relevant theology more, such as theosis.