>>659879
>Your autocracy will inevitably devolve into a oligarchy in 2 weeks, given no one can rule alone, since they aren't the frikkin Minds from the Culture.
I never said one man can. I'm not an autist who thinks if 2 people rule together it is no longer an autocracy. Don't think in black and white. The difference is in the number of members and in an autocracy there is an over arching non chosen force that rules all. The autocrat. Much like the Logos. No one chose Him nor did any man chose what is morally correct, to claim otherwise is literally satanism. (Note, I'm not saying there is no free will, I'm saying no man chose the laws of nature and Logos established by Jesus Christ, God the Word).
I'm making the point that the ruler can not be chosen otherwise it will be chosen by kikes, satanists and nepotists. But I repeat myself.
>That's because people are retarded, and don't know what a civic culture is.
And you don't know what blame is. You can't punish a culture, that is why, as I said, oligarchies are blameless and unpunishable.
This also adresses
>>Impunity is impossible with an absolute ruler, because his absolute responsibility precedes his absolute power.
>Because?
Because the autocrat, an actual being with a face and a neck that bleeds can be punished instead of a "culture". Many kings and dictators have been deposed by the people various times in history and the folk survived, albeit they suffered, they survived and another autocrat took reign from there. When an oligarchy (mainly plutocrats) collapsed, it was a total economic and/or military meltdown that was devastating for the common folk. Since the oligarchy is the rule of money, its fall can not go otherwise. Much like the fall of carthage, the merchant republic of venice and novgorod, the late western roman empire and even the future US, I speculate.
An autocrat actually has responsibility unlike oligarchs since oligarchs are devoided from punishment. Much like you said, in an oligarchy the punishment is passed to an invisible and unpunishable idea that is civic culture.
Cultures can not be punished.
>>Even if created by good intentions, the corruptable who drool for power will naturally infiltrate it.
>Yeah. Read that again. Slowly.
No need to be smug about it, write directly at me. I know autocracies are subjected to infiltration. I'm simply saying they are less so than oligarchies.
Again, I'm not autistic so I don't think there is such thing as an incorruptable government. That doesn't mean advocating stronger government types is not valid.
>Then where are your super-efficient govs that cut through red-tape like a knife through butter, and shame our silly, inefficient memes about "checks and balances" and "not giving all the power to some random faggot, and hoping for the best" on this planet?
The government I'm defending is not effective at all. It works with the unffectiveness of the autocrat, leaving it with no choice of either creating an oligarchy to manage things (western roman empire) or delegating more power to local folk and authority (themas in the eastern roman empire and I'd say to some extent, in the pre-Soviet Russian Empire).
Again, the autocrat is only there to collect the military and taxes. Nothing else. He can't do anything else due to administrative impossibility, which leaves public life like home defense (ownership of arms, the mark of a free man in the ancient and medieval world), speech laws, marriage laws and I would go so far as to say education (home schooling) and religion to the folk and to the church in complete Symphonia according to the Orthodox view.
That symphonia is what ultimately must happen to not spiral into secular oligarchy and so what I'm advocating on can resurge. That is what most kingdoms, to varying degrees, had before the enlightenment.
And it is not technology the main difference between us, as some people like Kaczynski claim, but religiosity.
If you want a modern example, I think the Orthodox Kikes in the US and Israel are what I defend. They themselves care for schooling, religion and farming. Therefore forming autarkic pockets in the greater government that is the Talmudic state of the West Bank (usurper of the term Israel). Much like a terrorist cell, if one of those pockets dies out, the others still survive.
The only difference is that I want a simpler government on top that is not nepotistic and that is accountable for its mistakes.