>>655454
Alright, first of all, the progressive radicals were led by a wolf called Bernhard Rothmann. This guy was at first literally a trained Catholic. On January 23 1532 he was a Lutheran. On August 10 1532, Rothmann took over the Munster churches for the first time, and this time he was now against Luther and for Zwingli. On May 6 1533 Rothmann changed his view again, after some other political rabblerousers entered and set up camp in the city. It is by Rothmann that all of this happened, and he was a chameleon who was first Catholic, then he was Lutheran, then pedo-baptist Protestant, then Credobaptist all in the span of a few months.
Second, churches administering baptism correctly isn't a "movement." It's always been done. Third, churches that baptize correctly don't spawn denominations, which are by nature political movements; fourth, Anabaptist was originally a derogatory term used by pedo-baptist heretics back in the 5th century or earlier, it was not originally the name of a denomination of baptists.
Fifth, the mennonites at that time were an unrelated and earlier group of actual churches in Switzerland in the 1520s that were pacifist, and their confession was not influenced by the Munster rebellion, nor do the two historically have any connection except for being political offshoots. There existed many churches already practicing these things throughout Switzerland, Holland, Germany, England and Wales that predate both, and neither of these two historically late offshoots define the church. And lastly, being pacifist and being law-abiding are two different things.