Good arguments for classical theism and against panentheism and pantheism?Spoon fed me, /christian/

Email
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
Password	(Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Comment *

File

Password

(Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)

* = required field

[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf Max filesize is 16 MB. Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000. You may upload 5 per post.

Embed

(replaces files and can be used instead)

Options

Do not bump
(you can also write sage in the email field)

Spoiler images
(this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.

File: 6574279987fa874⋯.gif (36.46 KB, 710x621, 710:621, 6574279987fa874b2193ae9efd….gif)

Christanon 05/09/18 (Wed) 15:46:14 4cf432 No.645215

Good arguments for classical theism and against panentheism and pantheism?

Spoon fed me, /christian/

Christanon 05/09/18 (Wed) 17:35:37 15611a No.645246

Ite ad Thomam

http://www.newadvent.org/summa/1.htm

Christanon 05/09/18 (Wed) 17:40:40 ffba42 No.645249

The NT

Christanon 05/09/18 (Wed) 19:00:01 033860 No.645276

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>645215

Panentheism is a branch of classical Christian theism in its 'weak panentheist' form.

While I'm unsure about adopting the label, I have to admit that it makes scriptural sense to me, and I'm a Reformed Baptist.

Christanon 05/09/18 (Wed) 19:00:35 407150 No.645277

>>645246

Note that Aquinas' arguments and terminology are notoriously hard to understand correctly for moderns and it's extremely easy to misinterpret them (indeed, I don't think I've seen anyone including myself understand them correctly on the first try).

Instead of reading Aquinas directly, a beginner should rather read some contemporary Thomist explaining his thought. Feser is the most popular one today, and for a good reason, he really can explain the arguments in a clear and coherent way. I'd advise his Aquinas: A Beginner's Guide.

Christanon 05/09/18 (Wed) 20:10:16 15611a No.645315

>>645277

Taylor Marshall's "Thomas Aquinas in 50 Pages: A Layman's Quick Guide to Thomism" is good too.