>>643505
>people misusing a term invalidates its use in all cases
When it's widespread, yes it does.
When you purposefully use a word that has a common misunderstanding, just because "that's not what it actually means duuuur" you're difficulting communication for the sake of being pedantic.
>It was probably a LARPer who branded you one, ever think of that?
Do you honestly think the majority of people who disagree with you here are just pretending?
Are you like a child who can not abstract that other people have different views from you and no one is being purposefully arrogant or an asshole?
Or are you just a woman? Maybe just a little faggy?