3bc901 No.619154
Where do you get news from? I'm looking for Right/Christian news sources
Thanks
5b7af7 No.619158
0c5fae No.619159
>>619158
Unironically this. I stopped watching or keeping track of the news a long time ago. Earth-shattering (so it's thought) or massively popular (usually pointless) events will get to me anyway, so I have no need for it at all. If I really want to know something I can glance at a newspaper headline as I see 'em around, but I don't really do that.
360c78 No.619164
>>619158
I just feel dumb and most news is left leaning
91c98a No.619166
>>619164
You feel dumb? How so?
27414d No.619184
>>619166
I want to be able to defend and express my political and religious beliefs with facts and stats. My friends and coworkers are mostly liberal and only know one side of the spectrum and have antireligious values
2425da No.619189
>>619184
prepare yourself with simple lines of argumentation in matters of faith and current affairs. Also ask for help to the Holy Spirit.
7b2b9b No.619190
From ex-esoteric/New Age Christians see >>614126
0c7be5 No.619192
I see the shills are back seeing as there's been a spike in active users lately.
545531 No.619193
Black christians > White neopagans
Black christians > White atheists
27414d No.619200
>>619193
OK… go make your own thread this is about right-christian news sources
8bc816 No.619201
>>619154
I have a chip in my head that is on a continuous feed from leftist furry CIA agents.
… don't you?
0c7be5 No.619213
Go watch Lauren Saothern and Goldy Bimbolocks for your healthy dose of "Christian" alt-right e-idols.
79297d No.619217
4b41e4 No.619220
>>619193
Lousy logic. You know why?
whites can convert religions.
blacks can't change their race.
Just look at OJ, Tiger Woods, Bill Cosby, and any other plethora of rich blacks who end up hitting/assaulting/cheating on gf's.
inb4 some crappy "but whites do it too" argument, you faggots know proportionality matters.
545531 No.619223
Sage and report
Black christians > White neopagans
Black christians > White atheists
4b41e4 No.619224
79297d No.619226
Who gives a shit about skin tone, we're in /christian/, we can talk about blacks when it comes to denominations.
Back to /pol/
4b41e4 No.619228
>>619226
Then don't bring it up like this moron did. >>619193 Literally the one time it comes up, NOTHING about it mentioned before this.
79297d No.619230
>>619228
Keep continuing it then. Agreement, let's stfu about it, you don't need to reply
27414d No.619234
Drudge report is decent anyone like it?
27414d No.619237
>>619217
Do u know where u are?
f52256 No.619250
I like using Reuters.
>>619234
It's unambiguously right-wing and doesn't shy away from sensationalism. If you're okay with that, it's fine.
abf95e No.619252
>Right-wing
>Christian
Pick one, burger. Besides, /christian/ is a ChristCom board.
27414d No.619257
>>619252
Just make your own thread on red dit and leave.
274f4b No.619260
Just here to post based French guy
ca6b47 No.619265
>>619193
>>619223
>>619252
>>619226
You're not even completely wrong on all points, but will you shut the fuck up already?
8405f7 No.619269
Ah great, another thread where lefty heretics and righty heretics pop up and argue against each other. Let me lay out some truth for you.
1. It is not sinful to believe in racial differences, it is not sinful to be a nationalist
2. It is sinful to believe that people from races you dislike can’t be saved, it is sinful to prioritize your racial politics over the Gospel (yes that goes for both /pol/ and “anti-racists”)
54e6f5 No.619272
drudge report
better: don’t watch the news. there is nothing good there
506539 No.619274
>>619154
Daily Caller, fam. It's as fun and less sensationalist than breitbart. Also Vox Day's blog he comments on anything that's fairly significant politically, along with a lot of niche right wing entertainment stuff he's working on that can be mildly entertaining if you're interested in comics or science fiction writing.
>>619193
>>619217
>>619223
>>619226
>>619252
>Le race is skin tone may may
>Christ was a communist
Has a mod been advertising on reddit again? And isn't there a dedicated politics thread you could be shitting up?
>>619269
>Horseshoe
I mean you're right but implying that this is an error both ends of the political spectrum are equally liable to is disingenuous, believing niggers can't be saved is fringe even for /pol/.
Anyway I agree people should stop OT political shit in unrelated threads, this is a board for spiritual betterment, and the OP's request wasn't directly about a political issue
f52256 No.619277
>>619260
Napoleon was very far from based. Read a biography of his – he was very much a product of the French Revolution and all that entails. His statements to Muslims during his Egyptian campaign just go to show that.
Polite sage for off-topic.
4b41e4 No.619283
>>619277
>he was very much a product of the French Revolution and all that entails.
Oh, I don't know about that. I reckon he was more a response to the French Revolution, a counter-argument embodied. If he was an actual "product" I reckon he would not have installed himself as an Emperor, but would rather have just joined the crappy democracies that were in play at the time. I would call those democracies products of the French Revolution, it's far more accurate.
da129e No.619299
>>619154
The Daily Stormer
4b41e4 No.619302
>>619299
Are they still up? I thought they were shut down. Does Anglin still run it?
6b0cff No.619389
>>619299
Tried but the TOR site is so slow for me its unreadable
a58177 No.619390
>>619184
>>619154
Read Drudge Report for breaking news/current events. i also watch fox news, but they are hardline cuckservative and are literally owned by (((them)))
i Also reccomend reading a few books that will give you wide insight on politics through a christian /or traditionalist perspective.
Libido Domandi, by E michael Jones
Ride the tiger and Revolt against the Modern world, by Julius Evola (i know hes a neofagan psuedo modernist but just take the good and leave the bad)
Sex and Character, by Otto Weinigner
Crisis of the Modern World, by Rene Guenon
If and when you finish these books you will have a solid foundation for defending your political views.
360c78 No.619399
edd75d No.619422
>>619193
The fact that this post has so many replies vehemently denying it shows how fallen this board is. Shame.
e5c196 No.619424
>>619422
So dramatic, /christian/ gets recovering /pol/lacks often with waves of /leftypol/, gnostic, new age, pagan and muslim trolls.
595f0a No.619440
>>619424
To be honest, at least you can talk to them /pol/lacks… in the past I was always on 4/pol/, even met some good Christians there; but now that place is full of “pagans” and “kekistani warriors”, pure cancer…yesterday I went there and they first tried to claim Romans where Nordic people and then that Viking raiders had the best civilisation because they didn’t want to build big cities and so on.
abf95e No.619451
>>619424
I like to think ChristCom anons are an important part of our dysfunctional family
440d1d No.619452
>>619422
People are tired of reasons making every thread about politics. It doesn't matter if it is anti/pol/ shit, it is still tiresome
595f0a No.619457
>>619452
True, even if: homo zoon politikon…we are always dragged towards the divine, the bestial and the politic.
bcee1b No.619460
>>619440
Do yourself a favor and don't go back anon.
>I went there and they first tried to claim Romans where Nordic people and then that Viking raiders had the best civilisation because they didn’t want to build big cities and so on.
That's pretty funny, the whole trump parade got them excited. The truth will stand on it's own, maybe not at that moment, but eventually they will know that was erroneous.
>>619451
>ChristCom
That's the anarchist christian posts we get here every now and then?
>>619452
It's because Christianity is in a tough spot where it allows for racial realism, but requires loving your neighbor.
0c7be5 No.619462
>>619460
>allows for racial realism
No it's because of skeptics and non believers trying to slide their political beliefs into every thread.
bf08a1 No.619467
>>619462
It's two "truths" trying to understand each other. All the races are different.
0c7be5 No.619470
>>619467
No major church will overtly profess or affirm any of the racialist views spewed by the alt-right's relatively recent surge of the last few years.
a58177 No.619474
>>619470
This is because most churches are infiltrated by marxist lunatics whose ideologies(political/ religious) line up with the anti christian enlightenment cockroaches instead of the catholic traditionalists of the past
69a434 No.619475
>>619470
I can see how discrimination is not christian, but racial realism is simply biology. If someone is born with one leg you're not going to pretend they have both? That shouldn't stop you from having compassion for them while understanding they're different. The bible is full of gender, racial, religious divisions, as well as love.
>Acts 17:26 and He made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed times and the boundaries of their habitation,
>No major church
We have some major churches encouraging open borders and promoting the world government or the New Age. The Church of Chrisitan Zionism, the ladder day saints church, the watch tower organization are all major yet heretical churches. The international House of prayer is teaching others to do Kundalini awakening which is opening your third eye to spiritual activity.
0c7be5 No.619486
>>619474
>>619475
Not even the "fundamentalist" churches will. Racialism is literally a fringe belief within the world's churches. For a church to haphazardly hop on to some spur of the moment political bandwagon would be an error as has been evidenced already.
360c78 No.619487
>>619470
No major, authentic, church finds itself on the left/liberal spectrum.
Only lukewarm protestant sects.
360c78 No.619488
>>619470
All those views were common sense pre-19th century. Ask any English, Dane or German priest or laity about the people in Africa….ask them about the Jews….they would give you politically incorrect analysis.
0c7be5 No.619489
>>619487
I think there's plenty of liberalism in Catholicism as well and the Orthodox Churches were brought under the sway of the governing entities throughout various points in history.
>>619488
The views would have been common but the churches would probably feel little need to make any pronouncements on it and if they did it would probably be within the realm of what their contemporary societies found tolerable, just like now.
a58177 No.619490
>>619486
Fundamentalists are nothing but moderist marxists larping as "conservative". If they were truly "conservative" they would be racialists just like the billions of traditional christians of the past.
>For a church to haphazardly hop on to some spur of the moment political bandwagon would be an error as has been evidenced already.
Maybe to a Modernist like you, whose political and religious views stay nice and updated according to the modern times. Im sorry but there is only one Enemy in this world, and he uses different ways to destroy us, through war and infighting, through diseases and famines, and racial genocide but no matter the way used the outcome is always the same. If a Church/christian cant recognise this then they are not an actual christian
0c7be5 No.619492
>>619490
It's not the churches' job to administer ethnic segregation among the public. Plus scripture may only give answers on why different "races" exist not how to react to it.
595f0a No.619502
>>619492
I wish there was a middle ground: I am an immigrant in the UK, I am thankful for the opportunity and to the natives; however there are huge issues with migratory fluxes in this Country and the laws in place make sure you go to jail or get “crucified” on the papers and other media if you “dare” to have a “racist” or “islamophobic” opinion.
I’m ok with limited and possibly temporary immigration (I plan to go home in a few years), even for a few of these migrants to settle down and get married; in no way, however, I would accept a multicultural church or society: part of the beauty of this world resides in all the cultures we have.
98f7df No.619508
>>619489
>been common but the churches would probably feel little need to make any pronouncements on it and if they did it would probably be within the realm of what their contemporary societies found tolerable
interestingly the Churches felt no need to speak against those common views, although they spoke against many other actually sinful views.
>I think there's plenty of liberalism in Catholicism as well and the Orthodox Churches were brought under the sway of the governing entities throughout various points in history.
maybe insofar as they have strayed from their traditions and sacred literature, a sign of decay. But in terms of their social teachings majority are very much on the right/conservative spectrum.
A liberal christian is a lukewarm christian.
d35770 No.619514
>>619486
>Racialism is literally a fringe belief within the world's churches
The "world's" churches indeed. The point is still the same the popularity doesn't make it it's correct or credible. There are smaller baptist churches that allow freemasons to pray in the church and move Christians out of the way.
>For a church to haphazardly hop on to some spur of the moment political bandwagon would be an error as has been evidenced already.
You mean like all the churches putting up rainbow flags in support for gays? Division helps Christianity, it helps keep the apocalypse religion from bringing the world government and the rape religion from repeating history. It fragments controls from Satan's global dominance.
Why does /leftypol/ even shill here? They can never work with Christianity, just for any morsel of growth?
d35770 No.619515
>>619508
What is the video source of that image?
98f7df No.619516
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
mark dice covers recent events and modern degeneracy, and he's Christian and conservative.
af881e No.619522
>>619252
Go back to plebbit or facebook.
af881e No.619529
>>619154
Russia Today is quite solid.
4bf529 No.619567
fbb699 No.619602
>>619184
Can relate to this to some extent. I get to angry during arguments and end up making myself look like the wrong one, even though I'm stating facts and even citing sources.
78b841 No.619796
4bf529 No.619802
>>619796
Not an argument. Getting your news elsewhere means worse. It means getting it from kikes.
9344bd No.619837
>>619802
Reading right wing news sources is fine, but the Daily Stormer? They've advocated rape, among other terrible things.
78b841 No.619899
>>619802
So the only choice is between nazis (killed Christianity in germany, surpressed Christianity and killed priests in poland) and jews (rejected and killed Christ and hate christians)?
0c7be5 No.619924
>>619802
Implying anyone can't see that agitative groups that parrot banal and unrefined talking points are nothing more than manufactured opposition sicced on the public when they start to get too demanding with what they want, in order to drive them into a perpetual state of panic driven anti-fascism and forced to pick between manipulative oligarchs or the perceivedly terrifying militant insurrectionists looming on the other side thus keeping society in a perpetual state of manipulation and exploitation to a degree that the influential organizations and their associated figures find workable.
tl;dr shallow and simplistic political groups are tools and useful idiots, instrumental in subverting freedom and progress.
98f7df No.619956
>>619837
> They've advocated rape, among other terrible things.
doubt it, probably as a joke.
Most of the articles I've read from Dailystormer are great, sure the language and humor is a bit extreme but also refreshing given modern restrictions
d1133e No.620067
da129e No.620172
9344bd No.620180
>>620172
From their 'style guide':
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/01/15/inside-the-daily-stormers-style-guide
>Since the Daily Stormer was founded, in 2013, some non-Nazis have wondered how seriously to take it. Surely a site named for Der Stürmer—a Third Reich tabloid so crude that Joseph Goebbels, in his diary, called it “simple pornography”—couldn’t, in the current century, mean what it appeared to mean. Maybe it was an elaborate joke, or an attempt to test the boundaries of free speech. “The unindoctrinated should not be able to tell if we are joking or not,” the author writes, in a section called “Lulz.” “This is obviously a ploy and I actually do want to gas kikes. But that’s neither here nor there.” For legal reasons, the guide continues, writers shouldn’t openly incite violence; “however, whenever someone does something violent, it should be made light of.” The ultimate goal is to “dehumanize the enemy, to the point where people are ready to laugh at their deaths.” That settles that.
d1133e No.620187
>>620180
I don't know man the majority of the enemies of DS are already doing that but against white people. You have them saying it's racist to want to help white south Africans. One other example is Conan O Brien and leftists have been cheering Haiti when they literally genocided their white population in 1804
6c9bf6 No.620204
News is merely the plucking of things happening in the world, by others in the world. Because of this it is open to the same ability to bring deceit and lies upon you as just asking someone in person what is happening in the world, and that person being of Satan. With news agencies you have even more of a chance of that deceit; they're faceless and behind nothing more than a logo. If the "Right" had you twisted around their finger, and then brought out a news agency called "GoodTrueNews", would you believe everything it says?
The "Right" is not Christian, it's just another side that people take. No "side" is strictly Christian because politics is a worldly thing by design.
You can pick pretty much any political side, and it will have an extremity to it in which your fellow man becomes cast into tyranny and slavery, because they idolized politics instead of seeking God.
If you want to find out what is going on in the world, ask your pastor at church or others around you at church.
God is all-knowing, so those who seek God will have such things added to them, including the knowledge of what is going on around them.
Also that picture is no good, there is nothing in war worth glorifying; it comes about when man is not seeking God and Gods judgement has been brought upon them. If God has to install in someone the will to kill others for atrocious sin committed; it's nothing to celebrate over…it means fellow brothers, sisters, mothers, fathers, sons, daughters, wives and husbands had to perish because they chose not to find God and even when they were told it would lead to destruction they continued. For a picture to promote war simply by someones race, those agreeing with it will not be seeking God and your message for war will be stupidity.
This is why you see people seeking God so strongly at the end of a war; they begin to repent for their sins and mercy is brought upon them. In fact it's a very good example of God existing; we have at our fingertips the tools to completely destroy the world right now, and yet we have not done so. Please realize what a blessing this must be.
At the end of WW2, God showed mercy for many of the Germans who repented and realized what hell they had brought upon their lands; to those of their people who were innocent and to those who had served God well. They paid for their sins by the blood of God, literally.
>>619164
You aren't dumb. Please seek God though, not these larp pictures or larp sides.
Unless the authority of your country is telling you to go to war, unless its your leader asking you to do so; it would not be of God to seek these things on your own accord.
9344bd No.620295
>>620187
>I don't know man the majority of the enemies of DS are already doing that but against white people
Two wrongs don't make a right.
d1133e No.620554
>>620295
That is true but more than enough energy is directed to condemning Anglin and not enough at leftists and how openly genocidal they are.
2a5421 No.620559
>>620554
I'm not saying we should focus energy on hating him, just don't use him as a news source.
79f62b No.620560
>>619837
Anglin is provocative on purpose, but he doesn't advocate violence. He became more libertarian after infighting with TWP.
79f62b No.620561
>>620559
He's perfectly fine as a news source. He does have an opinionated slant, but so does every news source out there.
da129e No.620604
>>620180
Thanks for the link. I needed some kike paper to tell me how to think about this.