In a certain way, I suppose it could be a reason.
>But those who marry will face many troubles in this life, and I want to spare you this.
1 Cor 7,27. This translation is weird, but nonetheless, we have also
>32 I would like you to be free from concern. An unmarried man is concerned about the Lord’s affairs—how he can please the Lord. 33 But a married man is concerned about the affairs of this world—how he can please his wife— 34 and his interests are divided. An unmarried woman or virgin is concerned about the Lord’s affairs: Her aim is to be devoted to the Lord in both body and spirit. But a married woman is concerned about the affairs of this world—how she can please her husband. 35 I am saying this for your own good, not to restrict you, but that you may live in a right way in undivided devotion to the Lord.
1 Cor 7, 32-35
So is St. Paul saying here, a man who is married is worried how he can please his wife, and his interests are divided between her and the Lord. And isn't it common knowledge that women are harder to please? That women can hardly be ever satisfied with something? Some of you were saying that we shouldn't live our lives based on data, but doesn't that data doesn't just confirms the common sense, something everybody already knows?
So this can be a most worrying distraction, and a stumbling block to a man's salvation if he is not the most "pleasing" kind of man. He will have to carry such worries, and may not have any peace in his marriage..
Others were discoursing on the fallen nature of mankind, but without getting anywhere. I point to this lad here >>618436 specially, who said so much without adressing the issue. Of course, we have a fallen nature, but should that be used just to excuse ourselves and others? To me it seems reasonable that it be used to draw also an plan of action, and celibacy can be one.
So, if you think you will be caught by such worries (and you are already caught), then celibacy can be a good course of action.