[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha / animu / dcaco / games / leftpol / rolo / sonyeon / strek ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Email
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Christchan is back up after maintenance! The flood errors should now be resolved. Thank you to everyone who submitted a bug report!

File: e4ce78f2e449808⋯.jpeg (106.49 KB, 736x1338, 368:669, 003C65D9-DF29-4783-9620-7….jpeg)

3d29eb No.604407

>Rabbi Dr Fishel Szlajen cited traditional Jewish law

>Rabbi Dr Fishel Szlajen, who sits on the Vatican’s Pontifical Academy for Life, has said scripture justifies abortion in certain rare cases.

>In a largely pro-life article posted on Spanish-language site InfoBae, Dr Szlajen condemns abortion on demand, describing it as a crime that has been turned into a right. “‘The right to decide what to do with one’s own body’” manipulates and intentionally obscures the fact that we are dealing with “two distinct humans” he said.

>However, he goes on to say that there is a case where scripture justifies killing the “conceptus” (the embryo in utero).

>“In only one case does the Bible call for abortion: when the life of the conceptus inexorably threatens that of its mother,” he said. In such cases, the life of the mother takes priority.

>Dr Szlajen justifies this position by citing the Jewish law of the “rodef”, which allows people in certain circumstances to kill someone who is endangering the lives of others.

>Cases of anencephaly, irreversible degenerative pathologies and terminal disease where the “conceptus” will certainly die are examples of ‘tzorech gadol’ (grave necessity) where “abortion is permitted with severe restrictions”.

>The same goes for a woman who has become pregnant through rape, and for whom continuing the pregnancy would result in “serious psychophysical danger”.

>Jewish scholars have debated the “rodef” law for centuries. Some have used it to justify killing politicians or even voters they see as endangering the Jewish people. The most notorious example in recent years was Yigal Amir, who assassinated former Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin due to concessions made to the Palestinian Authority in the Oslo Accord.

>Others dispute this interpretation of the law, saying it only applies when the threat to life is imminent and when the threat is spontaneous.

>Dr Szlajen is not the only member of the academy to back abortion in certain circumstances.

>Before he was appointed, Professor Nigel Biggar said abortion was permissible before 18 weeks, adding: “It’s not clear that a human foetus is the same kind of thing as an adult.”

>Another member of the academy, Rabbi Avraham Steinberg said the unborn child has “no human status” before 40 days. After 40 days, it has “a certain status of a human being, not full status”.

http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/news/2018/02/12/member-of-vatican-pro-life-academy-says-bible-justifies-abortion-in-cases-of-rape-and-disability/

518d6b No.604410

>Rabbi

Stopped reading there tbh


c72807 No.604412

File: d666f79e3582a8e⋯.jpg (77.33 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, Free money.jpg)

>>Rabbi Dr Fishel Szlajen cited traditional Jewish law

At last I truly see


be25c8 No.604417

>Rabbi

>says Bible justifies abortion in exceptional cases

>cites traditional Jewish law

>no quotes or anything from Bible provided

>>The same goes for a woman who has become pregnant through rape, and for whom continuing the pregnancy would result in “serious psychophysical danger”.

>but killing your kid isn't serious psychophysical danger wew

>Jewish scholars have debated the “rodef” law for centuries. Some have used it to justify killing politicians or even voters they see as endangering the Jewish people.

actually very interesting piece of information


d19164 No.604418

Reminder that Our Lady told us this would happen and in the end her Immaculate heart will triumph.


be25c8 No.604419

>>604417

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodef

The source for this law is the Tractate Sanhedrin in the Babylonian Talmud

>Babylonian Talmud

>Bible

HAHAHAHAHAH


f12a8d No.604422

>Rabbi

>Vatican

Anyone care to explain?


be25c8 No.604425

>>604422

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontifical_Academy_for_Life

On 18 October 2016, Pope Francis approved new statutes for the Academy, which ended the life terms of all its 172 current members. The statutes were made public on 5 November and scheduled to take effect on 1 January 2017.[8] The new statutes dropped a statement Academy members had been required to sign, promising to defend life in accordance with Church teaching,[9] though they required members to "promote and defend the principles regarding the value of life and the dignity of the human person interpreted in conformity with the Magisterium of the Church". They also established that members would be selected "without any religious discrimination"[8] and that members would be appointed to five-year renewable terms rather than for life.[10]

On 13 June 2017, Pope Francis appointed 45 ordinary members from 27 countries; thirteen were reappointments. A minority were Catholic clergy. Their five-year terms can be renewed until the mandatory retirement age of 80. Included were an Argentine rabbi and an Anglican priest. Paglia said that the inclusion of non-Catholics, "either belonging to other religions or nonbelievers", was meant to demonstrate that "the protection and promotion of human life knows no divisions and can be assured only through common endeavor".


3ed20f No.604453

>>604425

>was meant to demonstrate that "the protection and promotion of human life knows no divisions and can be assured only through common endeavor".

Which is totally nonsensical, as most other Christians don't even value human life to the same degree as Catholics do, forget satan-worshiping savages from other "faiths."


3e0bb8 No.604455

>>604425

Ridiculous, I don't need some Jew or Anglican attempting to subvert the church. Also why does all this seem to swirl around Francis, how can one man be so drenched in modernism?


ad690d No.604473

>>604425

>On 13 June 2017, Pope Francis appointed 45 ordinary members from 27 countries; thirteen were reappointments. A minority were Catholic clergy.

:((((


82df34 No.604480

>>604425

FRANCISCO SI


847221 No.604481

File: 0c21bb0f503bb1f⋯.webm (9.3 MB, 480x360, 4:3, choo choo jew.webm)


e6e23c No.604496

>>604412

I thought that you joking, but I noticed that a lot of them are involved in the abortion industry.


40672f No.604497

>>604425

POPE JEWCIS


92c4ec No.604514

>>604496

less filthy goyim to partake in pogroms


c4b316 No.604515

File: dfc42b426610c1e⋯.jpg (99.38 KB, 680x966, 340:483, 1444110243278.jpg)

>>604425

>non-Catholics have a major role in leading your religion

Keep it up bros, God is smiling down on you


384ccb No.604617

File: 9fb811e57265e54⋯.webm (1.88 MB, 1920x1080, 16:9, Skidaddle skidoodle your ….webm)


ccbc90 No.604709

>>604515

You're supposed to defend the Church, not partake with her accuser's. Never cheer for Satan.


7c1345 No.604733

>>604453

It's correct though, that abortion is wrong is part of natural law, it's not a purely religious command that Catholics can oppose only because that's what their religion says. People need to realise that being anti-abortion isn't a thing that is only tied to Catholicism; it can be defended with secular, natural law reasons alone, and showing the world pro-life non-Catholics, especially non-Christians, is a good idea, because it shows that the idea of abortion as a religious, not natural law, issue, is false.


be25c8 No.604755

>>604733

I see your point, but rabbi Szlajen doesn't look to be very helpful.


f12a8d No.604757

>>604733

That's a good point, although most non-Catholics and even non-Christians like the Jews have already established that they're pro-life. On that basis it would have been preferable to appoint pro-life atheists or agnostics that have made good secular and rational arguments against abortion.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha / animu / dcaco / games / leftpol / rolo / sonyeon / strek ]