>>599076
>that assessment of Krishna seems a bit too
selective.
>While it does state those titles,
>despite the purpose of the text being to show him as lord of all beings: mortal, mystical, demonic, or otherwise.
I think you're missing an important detail. Part of the nature of demons is that they aren't going to flat out tell you they're demons, unless you're already bought into some critical lies. Satan is trying to replace God, the religions worshiping him are full of mocking counterfeits.
Just the fact that it's a gender ambiguous demons means it's not God, (just for the sake of argument even if chrisitanity is false, that wouldn't remove the satanic elements from other religions) nor would something that is holy call itself those titles. While Something evil would actually benefit from lying about their position.