/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

>>588541

0/10 work on your bait

>>588542

>The truth is bait

>THE KINGDOM OF GOD LIES WITHIN ALL MEN.

The proper quote is "The kingdom of God will be all around you". That "inside of you" thing is a bad translation meme.

You're welcome!

>>588549

Luke 17:21

Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.

Yes, but would you agree that virtue signaling is a form of pride?

>>588551

That's the bad translation meme I mentioned.

race mixing destroys what god created and is not christian

>>588552

Yes, but I am not trying to virtue signal. I am trying to address something I have seen amongst some posters on this board which I think comes from unchristian beliefs.

>>588553

>KJV is a bad translation

>>588555

>OP is a KJVOnlyist

Explains everything.

>>588554

Moses had an Ethiopian wife, Zipporah.

>>588557

You don't have to come from my perspective to believe this. It is the mainstream belief for the Roman Catholics and Orthodox as well as most Protestant churches.

>>588560

I think you are trying to distract from the topic by focusing on a very simple image.

>>588559

so? moses was a human and was capable of sin

>>588563

>Moses was capable of sin

It's funny you said that because God punished Moses' sister for being racist towards Zipporah

Seems like the sin lies eslewhere

>>588563

So why didn't God tell him it was wrong? God gave Moses lots of commandments.

/leftypol/ infiltration thread

>>588569

I am not a leftwinger. That is a baseless accusation.

>>588569

I think it's someone who wants (You)s. There's a hundred and one ways you can justify nationalism with Christianity.

>>588576

Mods can confirm that is not true, since they can check my post history if they wishes and see my sincere contributions to discussion.

Why when somebody states this sort of thing do you immediately jump to it being a troll? Does it make it easier to dismiss what they say?

>>588578

It's more of the case of this topic being a dead horse among dead horses.

>>588576

Nationalism = Racism?

>>588580

If it was a dead horse it would be a settled debate, which judging by people not defending their views but rather running from them seems to me to suggest they can't justify them very well.

jews

Amen brother. I'm simply astonished that people on here call Hitler a Christian and praise him. What a joke.

>>588584

What else would the OP being discouraging if not nationalism?

>>588585

If you wanted a sincere discussion maybe you wouldn't open with a pure strawman?

>>588589

I haven't mentioned nationalism in this thread, I have discussed racism. The two can be related, but not necessarily, and nationalism does not come in one variant.

God created nations, but he did not create them so that they could practice hatred and evil between one another.

>>588593

I didn't open with a strawman. I opened with a stating of biblical belief on racism.

>>588595

I think racism refers to prejudice based on race or racial characteristics, but I think we would be getting into semantics if we argued over that.

>>588594

What's the point of the thread then.

>>588598

Well, modern society tells us racism and prejudice are synonymous. But I don't think it has to be this way. Every race has something different about them. Stating this is often seen as a bad thing. But it doesn't have to be, I think we would all be happier if we learned to accept our differences. People who are "pro-diversity" are in this sense actually anti-diversity because they promote a melting pot of cultures and races. The destruction of what makes the world so unique and colorful

>>588600

To state the biblical position and argue against those who identify as Christians but do not hold it, for example this individual >>588563 >>588554

Are you against all forms of immigration? Are you against interracial relationships?

>>588541

I think pope Pius XI in his encyclical to the Catholics in Nazi Germany put it best:

>8. Whoever exalts race, or the people, or the State, or a particular form of State, or the depositories of power, or any other fundamental value of the human community - however necessary and honorable be their function in worldly things - whoever raises these notions above their standard value and divinizes them to an idolatrous level, distorts and perverts an order of the world planned and created by God; he is far from the true faith in God and from the concept of life which that faith upholds.

There is nothing wrong with wanting to preserve and defend your community.

Also, regarding immigration, st. Aquinas put it well:

>Saint Thomas teaches that immigration must have in mind the common good; it cannot destroy or overwhelm a nation.

>Immigration should have as its goal integration, not disintegration or segregation. The immigrant should not only desire to assume the benefits but the responsibilities of joining into the full fellowship of the nation.

Now, I ask you, is it wrong to reject someone who doesn't want to assume the responsibilities and who endangers the common good?

Anyone here familiar enough with Morris and Rushdoony's stuff to know if their ideas are false?

I know Rush believed in "Kinism," and Morris in a more extreme form of the Curse of Ham, but I want to know if their ideas were biblically justifiable.

>>588602

Well I would agree there is an issue with the "pro-diversity" people, because they also obsess over race and put it in the forefront of their minds, rather than God.

>>588606

>Are you against all forms of immigration?

Not all, it depends on many factors.

>Are you against interracial relationships?

No.

>>588607

>Now, I ask you, is it wrong to reject someone who doesn't want to assume the responsibilities and who endangers the common good?

If somebody comes to destroy a country or to take over its society then they are an invader and are acting in an evil manner, self defence is certainly justifiable in those types of situations.

>>588612

>If somebody comes to destroy a country or to take over its society then they are an invader and are acting in an evil manner, self defence is certainly justifiable in those types of situations.

The problem I think then comes from how one would define invasion. Would you consider cultural subversion a form of invasion?

>>588613

Can you give an example of cultural subversion?

>>588612

>>588612

>Would you consider cultural subversion a form of invasion?

Good question and yes I personally would. immigration is about assimilation, that's why in history immigrants were given citizenship only after 2 generations, the Jews had those rules too. An immigrant has no right to demand freedom of his religion or to impose his culture. Accepting uneducated, uncivilized immigrants is no one's obligation.

>>588615

Much of the modern western world is under threat of subversion. In the past subversion typically came with a direct invasion and a change of the local state. Today is more complicated. The state remains the same, but ideologues who wish to potentially undermine Christian values remain

>>588541

Too much /pol/tier faggotry here. Reminder that /pol/ Nazi's hate Christians.

>>588621

A big problem with /pol/ is that they see the large majority of everything through race. They may superficially understand the problem, but they don't understand the spirit of it.

Unborn children who are murdered in the womb are pure. It doesn't take long to turn a child into a devil in this age.

>>588618

That has always been there, Christianity has been under attack since its founding. I oppose that subversion of course.

>>588594

>I didn't open with a strawman.

Not a single person on this board 'hates' other people because of their race. Except you. 'You' hate white people.

>>588627

I am a white person. I don't hate anybody because of their race.

>>588628

Do you believe it is wrong to oppose racemixing?

>>588630

I don't put race above individuals like that.

Galatians 3:28-29

There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.

And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

>>588635

Do you think white people should exist?

>>588639

Sure

>>588642

So you believe it is wrong whites to be racemixed into extinction? Or do you not put race above (((individuals))) like that?

>>588645

I think the /pol/ belief that everyone is going to mix is just not accurate so I reject the premise.

>>588541

Is having preference toward your own people racism ? Is it sinful ? Even if we don't hate other races ?

I think not, God separated us for a reason (The tower of Babel)

>>588647

>I reject the premise.

Those who deny genocide always do.

>>588651

>Is having preference toward your own people racism ? Is it sinful ?

I guess it depends what form it takes. In principle no.

>>588652

I don't see any genocide of white people happening.

>>588657

>I don't see any genocide of white people happening

That's why you're a genocide denier, but we have digressed so allow me to re-assert my point; Do you believe it is wrong whites to be racemixed into extinction? Take note that my question lacks any connotation of active reality.

>>588658

I think that in principle genocide of any group is evil. Does that answer your question?

>>588660

Is that a yes?

>>588657

>>588658

I'm from France and I witness it everyday, it's still early to tell what will be the outcome of such situation but communitarianism is growing and tension between culture are on the rise. Whites don't care about family anymore, sex became too important, we make less and less kids. It's late here, so I'm tired, sorry if my sentences make little sense grammatically.

>>588663

That sounds to me more like the consequences of the abandonment of Christian values by the French people than anything, in favour of secular republican values.

>>588661

What do you think?

>>588663

>communitarianism is growing and tension between culture are on the rise

>Whites don't care about family anymore, sex became too important, we make less and less kids.

Another European here, I can confirm this though the country I live in is not yet as bad as France is now.

>>588664

You're not wrong, but illegal migration baked by the European Union and our politicians only worsen everything. How can we sort ourselves out when Islam is the fastest growing religion here ?

>>588549

The proper quote is "within you". That "I don't like what the Bible says so I'll just change it and say it was a bad translation" thing is a meme.

You're welcome!

>>588541

Racism is a sin. However, be careful not to confuse not being racist with dismantling all borders to help satan usher in the antichrist one-world government. Satan is the most crafty liar, and he will convince you that you're doing God's work while you do the opposite.

>>588664

>What do you think?

I think you capitulated the whole dispute

>>588671

The fastest growing group in France is atheists/non-believers, if you address that, the issue of Islam will be solved alongside it. Christianisation is the answer to Islam.

>>588673

Which is why I have not made that argument. It is in my OP, that God made nations and territories.

>>588673

racism is for me to be aware that races exist and that we are different. I hate no one because of this. Also, for example our european blacks behave better than the american blacks. So no doubt there is also a cultural component.

>>588663

>White genocide.

I guess I'm a mutt to most of you since I do have white in me, but white genocide is a meme.

If a worrying amount of whites do not care about family or reproduction, or seek to have mixed children for whatever dumb reason, and it happens in such a prevalence that whites go extinct (which will not happen at any point prior to genemodding, so never, but keep QQing about some Stacy not respecting your Aryan heritage), it would be white SUICIDE, not genocide. To be a white genocide, a third party would have to actively be killing off or sterilizing whites, and as much as /pol/ will have you think Jews are doing just that, nobody gives a shit who you have a family with.

I swear if /pol/fags spent as much time being Catholic and finding a woman to bear children with as they did being salty neckbeards on the internet, they could singlehandedly populate a small nation and uphold the 14 words all by themselves if they're so frightened.

Phyletism is heresy.

>>588541

>THE KINGDOM OF GOD LIES WITHIN ALL MEN.

Tell that to Judas Iscariot.

>>588541

>Racism is a sin, we are all created in the image of God. To hate one another based on how God created us is to hate the creator himself.

What do you mean by racism though? If it is just hating people based on their race, I think most people here would agree with you, including most 'racists'. If you mean by racism the idea that races exist and differ in strengths and weaknesses that's a whole other issue.

>Yes God created the nations and the territories, however he did so that we could learn to know one another, not to hate one another.

He created separate bounds of habitation so that we could not be bound by them? I don't get it. But yes the nations can be friendly, share the gospel with one another, etc. I don't think many here would disagree with that.

>THE KINGDOM OF GOD LIES WITHIN ALL MEN.

Sure.

>Hatred for each other based on race stands against God's message.

Who here denies this?

>Christ came for ALL humanity, not just whites, or blacks, Jews or gentiles.

I never hear anyone here say salvation is only for one race. Some CI wackos may show up now and then but only to be thoroughly argued with by all the regulars.

(((Satan))) wants you to racemix. Therefore, you shouldn't.

>blacks

>humans

>>588712

The idea that churches should exclude people based on ethnicity? No, they shouldn't do that. Churches should be open to whichever citizens in the nation wish to attend them. It's up to the state to restrict who is allowed into the nation in the first place on the basis of how assimilable they are, etc.

>>588541

Then why do all enemies of Christianity hate racism?

>>588563

>Steven Anderson was wrong

Heretic

>>588776

>Steven Anderson can do no wrong

now this is idolatry

>>588785

>(((File Deleted)))

>>588785

>>588788

>file deleted

wew, posted that pic many a time on this board and never had problems with it

making fun of commies/atheists/fags is harder now I guess

>>588797

>your own image

Treasonous idolater

>>588797

> Not only does the bible say bestiality is a sin

So I’m going to assume you believe certain races of men are beasts? Which ones? Sort of funny how neither the Bible nor Apostolic Teaching seems to support this.

> But it also states that God (h)as made you in his image. You should act in his words and create children of your own image.

Where do you draw the line in terms of “made in image/not made in image”?

>>588797

>your own image

Idolatry

>>588806

>Any race outside of your own. A european is considered a beast for a black christian too. It goes both ways.

>all men are created in God's image

<except all of them are also beasts in the eyes of everyone else

Wow, thanks for disproving yourself.

>>588807

> thanks for disproving yourself

Are you even capable of reading a bible with such poor reading comprehension?

>>588810

"But it also states that God as made you in his image."

"A european is considered a beast for a black christian too. It goes both ways."

These are two categorically contradictory statements.

>>588811

Unless he is declaring man a "divine beast" of some sort.

>>588803

>So I’m going to assume you believe certain races of men are beasts? Which ones?

the ones that can't build functioning civilizations/countries without outside help and foreign aid from races of men

>>588812

>Ken Ham

>dumb on genesis

>even dumber on race

his brain is made of ham

True, we are all one in christ and its not good to be racist.

But races are still distinct, probably for a reason, otherwise why would he create them? Don't forget the tower of babel.

>>588811

No.

>When an afican reads the scripture it says " God as made you in his image"

<So stay within your race and do not DESTROY IT.

>When an asian reads the scripture it says " God as made you in his image"

<So stay within your race and do not DESTROY IT.

>When an european reads the scripture it says " God as made you in his image"

<So stay within your race and do not DESTROY IT.

>>588816

Yes. You are correct. Love the image God gave you and continue it through your people.

>>588817

I think you are either purposefully ignoring the implications of your statements or you are deficient in the mental faculties.

You insist, firstly, that everyone is made in the image of God, and that that image is their race. Next, though, you say that there is a new category of beasts, which is SUBJECTIVE. Ergo, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO KNOW OBJECTIVELY WHETHER YOU ARE A "BEAST" OR NOT BECAUSE IT IS SUBJECTIVE. Caps because it's important. However, if you do not objectively know whether you are a beast or not, you cannot objectively whether or not you are made in the image of God (which you claim is an OBJECTIVE category encompassing ALL HUMANS). This is where your argument breaks apart. The only logical conclusions you could make at this point, following your logic, are: (a) that being a "beast" and being in the image of God are not contradictory categories, which not only destroys your argument anyways but also blasphemes God) or (b) that everyone is objectively a beast, which is once again contradictory and once again blasphemy.

Furthermore, though, you completely destroy all objectivity in this post. Allow me to explain: you make skin color an essential part of being in the image of God. First of all this is wrong because we are not Mormons and do not believe that any person in the Trinity other than the Son has a physical body. But furthermore, if each race reads the bible SUBJECTIVELY, and sees that HIS RACE, is the IMAGE of GOD, then what is God's race, OBJECTIVELY, according to your view?

>>588823

>False. You are a beast to people outside of your race. You are objectively different than other races.

Ok, so, second option. Look, I'm sorry that I have to spell this out for you, but YOUR CATEGORY IS SUBJECTIVE.

IF AN ASIAN READS WHAT YOU SAID, THEN WHITES, BLACKS, AND OTHER RACES AR BEASTS.

IF A WHITE READS WHAT YOU SAID, THEN ASIANS, BLACKS, AND OTHER RACES, ARE BEASTS.

IF A BLACK READS WHAT YOU SAID, THEN ASIANS, WHITES AND OTHER RACES ARE BEASTS.

S-U-B-J-E-C-T-I-V-E.

>Are you seriously going to tell me that race is only skin deep?

No, you seriously missed the point. And I don't disagree with you on this subject, and I don't know why you somehow assumed that I did. WE CAN TAKE ANY PART OF A RACE, BE IT SKIN COLOR, OR GENETIC DISTINGUISHING FEATURES, OR ANY OTHER FEATURES YOU MIGHT SUGGEST FOR THIS EXAMPLE.

Because, once again, IF I'M AN ASIAN AND I READ THE BIBLE AND THINK THAT MY RACE IS THE IMAGE OF GOD, AND THE OTHER RACES ARE BEASTS, THEN I THINK THAT GOD IS ASIAN.

BUT IF I'M WHITE AND I READ THE BIBLE I COME OUT WITH THE CONCLUSION THAT THE IMAGE OF GOD IS OF A WHITE MAN.

HOWEVER, GOD'S IMAGE IS NOT SUBJECTIVE, BUT OBJECTIVE. Ergo, your argument is crap. Please seriously read and think about what I wrote in capital letters and consider it.

>>588821

Point A is true in at least some sense, consider Psalm 49 and the book of Ecclesiastes. But that may only apply to the fallen state of man, not the original, restored state. Consider also how reprobates are canonically referred to as beasts. It's not an exaggeration.

Also, race difference is objectively much more than skin color. Even you should realize this with even a simple review of the facts. And no, I feel like I have to again say that I don't hate other races. But, get off that kool-aid, man. For your own good.

Seriously where is hafizposter when you need him?

Lamentations 5:1-2

Remember, O LORD, what is come upon us: consider, and behold our reproach.

Our inheritance is turned to strangers, our houses to aliens.

>>588822

Retards are made in the image of God.

>>588822

>tfw mixed (but more black than white)

>tfw family's median IQ is Ashkenazi Jew tier

>tfw supposed to take one for the team and intentionally limit the possibilities for certain aspects of my children's lives as not to offend the sensibilities of some random Christanon if I were to start a family with a woman that happens to be of a different ethnicity.

>>588822

All humans are made in the image of God. What is hard to understand about that?

I still don't want them living next door.

What is "racism"?

"Racism" is a Marxist term, intended to be used as an ethnic slur against white people.

If a white family engages in "white flight" to avoid blacks in a "multicultural" neighborhood….is that a "racist" act? If so, does that mean that "white flight" is a sin?

This thread is just more virtue signalling Marxist nonsense.

>posting them truth

>119 replies

Either everyone is really agreeing with OP or some /pol/acks are taking the bait

Racism, just like human rights, is a bad 20th century meme. A christian rejects the very concept of racism.

No. It's human mammalian animal nature. Also it is Christian. See;

tower of babel

You are committing heresy and should be burned at the stake for this.

I am in the middle on racism. I get on with people of different races, I don't really have a problem, but I disagree that one having a citizenship makes them as equal in my country as I am. They are more like guests, and should behave like guests. I would do the same in a foriegn country, but the problem with todays multiculturalism you have many races, cultures and nationalities competing for power, they want things to go their way and to suit their agenda. It is chaos, and I never asked for this.

If you replaced the Swiss with Japanese people, would Switzerland be Swiss or would it be Jap?

I agree with the Alt-Right on culture coming directly from race, but today we are going to see many problems, and conflicts. I am sure that the ruling elites made it this way, while everyone bickers, they remain in control.

>>588886

There are very few "racists" these days who genuinely want to go marching all over the globe, wiping out everyone who isn't them. What people want is for their home to remain their home.

>>588541

The Bible acknowledges that races exists and aren't equal

>>588880

>>588881

Explain

Racism? I'm not racist. I just want Italy to stay mostly Italian; I'm fine with small numbers of migrants, as long as they are Christians and they are integrated in our culture 100%. I am not a /pol/lack anymore, and even when I was I never believed Africans and Australian natives to be "beasts", lower humans. They have lower IQ, but this does not make them less human, and I agree that we should help them as we can, but in their home Countries, not bringing them here.

>>588889

>What people want is for their home to remain their home.

And your home is still your home when a foreigner moves in next door. Love thy neighbor, friend.

>>588929

Yes. Next door being a neighbouring country in this analogy.

>>588963

So, how far away does a person need to stay in order to stop being your neighbor and start being an immigrant? You do realize that every single nation's border that exists on the planet today was drawn by men, right? God didn't delineate today's "nations".

So, if I'm in Mexico City, how far north do I have to travel to stop being in God's Mexico and start being in God's USA? Quote scripture, please.

> wants to give Catholicism a chance

> joins mass

> everyone minus a few old people are immigrants

> feels like outcast

> goes back to being comfortable Protestant

>>588967

Quote the scripture that says I don't have to let Somalians live in my house. If you don't have such a thing, then it's all arbitrary, and we're all just making it up.

>>588975

how DARE YOU. you racist pos. I do not even see color when I see a person. I have no idea how many immigrants are at my church. All I see are christians.

>>588980

That's not an answer. I will ask again: According to scripture, when does a person stop being a neighbor and start being an immigrant?

>>588541

Zechariah 9:6

>And a mongrel race will dwell in Ashdod, And I will cut off the pride of the Philistines.

The Bible says mongrel races destroy nations.

I love how we have this thread with slightly different phrasing twice a week. It's almost like somebody's trying to convince me of consensus on something.

You have to go back.

>>588541

By today's standards, the Apostle Paul was a racist, because he believed in racial differences in intelligence and behavior which demanded that certain people must be treated differently than others.

>One of Crete's own prophets has said it: "Cretans are always liars, evil brutes, lazy gluttons." This saying is true. Therefore rebuke them sharply

>>588967

Psalm 74:17

Thou hast set all the borders of the earth: thou hast made summer and winter.

>>589127

So how far do these supposed borders extend, exactly? Towns? States? Provinces? Nations? Entire continents?

Or is it wherever you want it to be?

>>589130

It says all the borders, so I would respect that county line as well

>>588998

I mean I don't have a problems with immigrants in my church. But the entire church is made up on them and they give me this vibe like I'm not welcome. Other than that service seemed nice.

This topic really belongs in the /christian pol/ thread.

This threads are always simply meaningless. They start accusing everybody around here of 'raycism' without ever saying what is that racism, and them quoting loose verses.

Screw you, lad.

>>589211

t. racist

>>589212

Badmouther.

>>588541

Hierarchy is divine, though.

>To hate one another

Oh yeah… Racism used to be about that. No longer! It is the mere distinction between people!

Racism is a sin. However 99% of "racism" today is believing your own people have a right to self determination.

Yes, a hillbilly who beats up a nigger because he's black is the sin version of racism. Someone who believes racemixing has a detramental effect on society is not the sin version of racism.

>>589357

>mere distinction between people

And what do you say when you distinguish?

>>589370

>racemixing has a detramental effect on society

But then the question arises of what a race is. Do you mean the more obvious racial differences between the continents, or that even people of just differing ethnicities (Irish, Italian, German, etc) technically can't racemix for fear of further detriment?

>>589486

>But then the question arises of what a race is.

Race can be subdivided into it's smallest unit, family, so logically a race of people would be a people belonging or related to a house.

>>589490

So the only way to not racemix is most likely incest?

>>589370

No, I think 50% of racism is genuine racism. People have been listening too much to Jewish agitation propaganda, white women do not like blacks.

>>589492

Depends, are you Jewish?

>>589501

Person without ethnicity is pure abstraction. Because we are all one in Christ does that mean there is no male or female? We aren't absorbed into Christ wherein we lose all distinction but are rather united in such a way that we remain fully as person.

>>589510

>valid point made

<switches subject

Pentecost was the undoing of Babel, that argument is terrible.

>>589529

Revelation 7:9 and Revelation 21:24-26

>>589552

What does this have to do with anything? I'm not one of those pro-globalization satanists, so what's your point?

>>589557

Looks like you agree then and he has no point.

>Moses wife was a negro

One of the more common bible misinterpretations

>>589935

I got this one from my mom on MLK day.

>>589935

In any translation I've found, it either has "Ethiopian," "Cushite," or even "from Sudan." None of those appear to be Middle-Eastern.

http://biblehub.com/numbers/12-1.htm

>>589963

>>589956

"Ethiopian" was used like an insult. Midian was situated in Cush geographically.

In fact, Jethro, Zipporahs father was the high priest of Midian. Midian was a relative of he Israelites, and the high priest/priesthood of midian wouldve remained ethnically pure. To put it simply, Moses and Zipporah werent different races. Aaron and Miriam were just mad she wasnt an Israelite.

>>589988

That seems like a lot intellectual hoop-jumping to just to get around the fact that people sometimes marry outside of their race.

>>589991

Negative, dorkus malorkus. Phineas the son of Eleazar slew the outbreeding simeonite princes and pleased God. Why would God conduct Himself by punishing A&M and being pleased with Phineas killing racemixers? Its also true. Deal with it. Outbreeding/racemixing should be a felony. Literally.

>>589995

Whatever, Rushdoony

>>589996

http://www.businessinsider.com/daily-habits-to-be-smarter-2015-5

Neither is racial fetishism or perpetual boisterous display of one's assets for the purpose of sowing the envy of others. Believers should see to avoiding being covetous themselves as well as sowing it in others.

Economic and social libertines should both take heed of this.

>>588541

Why did God give half of all niggers borderline retarded IQ, then? We are all equal in the eyes of God as his children, but they have clearly been given a greater challenge than other races.

>>588565

>for being racist towards Zipporah

For being xenophobic. Understanding biological fact as an issue to be solved is different to opposing people on the basis of assumptions of culture.

>>588541

Nothing makes my blood boil quite like white stormfags who claim to be christian.

>>588563

You are a heretic as you say that interracial marriage is a sin. You are wrong.

>>588645

The whites are racemixing of their own will, Geez, no one is comitting genocide

>>590676

You can't deny that since white people became Christian they had a glorious civilisation. All that came crashing down once they rejected Jesus. Can't you see this? Based on your view, once whites became Christian, everything became worse. Absolutely Wrong. Things have became bad only RECENTLY.

>>590687

At last you come to the conclusion - Christianity is beneficial for people. Do not hate Christianity, because you are hating something that is good for your people.

As I said before, the JQ is a political question and should not influence your view of Christianity.

In a world that is plagued with leftists talkign about "muh racism" every single time someone dares to be white, yes, this is EXACTLY what we needed: yet another leftist telling us how terrrible da raycism is.

>>588800

>>588804

Not agreeing with him, but you do realize that it is not an idolatry and you are overusing this word and at the end ruining its purpose, right?

This is not idolatry and if you think so, you have a severe misunderstanding of the Christian teaching

>>588541

Racism is a demonic spirit

www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPxYKOJgd4Q&t=2m3s

http://www.christianityandrace.org

>>590671

Its really more like outbreeding. Also, outbreeding is being stupid on purpose or out of ignorance.

>>588541

>Christ came for ALL humanity, not just whites, or blacks, Jews or gentiles.

And this is exactly why we need to get rid of this religion.

>>588588

>I'm simply astonished that people on here call Hitler a Christian and praise him. What a joke.

Hitler wasn't Christian but he definitely deserves some praise, I mean, he tried to save Germany from satan.

>>588839

>Retards are made in the image of God.

The aggregate of humanity is the image of God. Retards balance it out.

>>588869

>All humans are made in the image of God. What is hard to understand about that?

Because man refers to humanity as an aggregate; a group, rather than every human as individuals?

Blacks balance out the races of high intellect to create a humble image of God, I imagine. Same with retards, cripples and so on.

>>590774

What is the jews aspect of the aggregate?

>>588822

every.human.is.made.in.image.of.God.

Word "cretin" originally meant "Christian" and was specially made up to remind others of this fact, that even most mentally defective imbecile, being human, was made in image and likeness of God.

>>590782

Evil, generally unrighteous negative influence to balance out.

>>590811

There's no biblical basis for this. "Balance" isn't important.

>>590710

Race worship is idolatry tho

>>590839

>Race worship is idolatry

Nah, humans are not graven images or anything.

Being attracted to females instead of males when male isn't idolatry.

Neither is preferring ones own race over some others.

>>590839

non that was stated there can be counted as a "race worship". Again stop flying around term "idolatry" where it shouldn't be, you're undermining its meaning and making it completely devoiced of its actual meaning.

>>590823

Just because it isnt specifically mentioned doesnt mean it cant logically be determined. For good to be good, there HAS to be an evil for comparison. Good isnt the good as we know it without an evil to balance and effectively define it.

/pol/ shills false flagging to make us look bad, fuck off.

>>590874

The bibe says otherwise. Maybe you try reading it sometime

>>590967

I did, and it doesn't. Evil is deficiency of Good and doesnt exist on its own. If you are supporting dualistic system and creating equal beginning and source alongside God, I advise you to get your manichean/gnostic ass out of this board

>>590976

What of Ham's descendants then? Were they all cursed, or only those from Canaan?

>>591001

If Ham was black and his brothers weren't, then Emzara's got some 'splainin to do.

>>591020

Good thing all us Christians are all grafted onto Israel alike then, or that verse would be irrelevant. Indeed, we should not marry outside of our tribe, and Christians of all ethnicities are our brethren, not heathens who share our skin color.

>>591035

>>591038

The book is still Catholic canon even though it’s not in the Bible. I asked a priest about it and he says it still stands. There are other passages in the Bible I could cite too. Mixing either religion or race in marriage is a sin.

>>591048

>Mixing either religion or race in marriage is a sin.

If you're going to rely on the Catholic Church for the authority of Tobias then you've already contradicted yourself because the Catholic Church does not teach that race mixing is a sin.

>>591051

It doesn’t teach letting muzzies invade and overthrow Christianity is a sin either.

>>591053

Okay? I would never promote that and I haven't seen a single person in this thread promoting it. This is the problem with your kind. Anyone who attacks you can't possibly agree with you on other points, if you attack a leftist you're immediately a fascist and if you attack someone on the right you're immediately a communist. Screw that.

>>591054

> if you attack a leftist you're immediately a fascist

If you attack a leftist then you're immediately a hero.

If you attack someone on the right you're immediately destroying your own immune system.

Unless you're a foreigner, then you're just doing what you do.

>>591055

I care about the truth, not a fucking line graph. And the Bible condemns discrimination based on race, that's all I've objected to in this thread. If you have an argument otherwise, then I'd love to hear it.

>>591058

>based on race

Well, what if they're an entire different species?

Interbreeding does produces fertile offspring sometimes.

>>591058

Christianity on race mixing

A widow, or a divorced woman, or profane, or an harlot, these shall he not take: but he shall take a virgin OF HIS OWN PEOPLE to wife.

Leviticus 21:14

Neither shall they take for their wives a widow, nor her that is put away: but they shall take maidens of the seed of the house of Israel, or a widow that had a priest before.

Ezekiel 44:22

A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the Lord.

Deuteronomy 23:2

>>591060

> but they shall take maidens of the seed of the house of Israel

Yuck.

>>591063

Kek

>>591068

>Seriously?

Yes, I mean..have you seen some of the …humans on this planet?

Like Australian aboriginals, or pygmies.

>>591067

I'm just not into tapirs, is all.

>>591059

>different species

Well clearly that would be condemned but no one would ever suggest that, and if they did it would be blatantly unscientific, the blog Alternative Hypothesis for example argues that races can be classified as subspecies but even they don't make the leap to claim that blacks are a different species, and no taxonomist would support that. So I hope you're joking.

>>591060

>Leviticus 21:14

I guess I'm a Levite priest or something because otherwise this wouldn't apply to me…hmmm…

>Ezekiel 44:22

So I have to marry a jewess now?

>Deuteronomy 23:2

I don't even see your point with this one

Also read the entire New Testament for starters, Christians are the New Israel, so any argument from the OT saying that Jews should not marry outside of their tribe is completely fine when applied to Christians but it has to be based on FAITH because that is the distinguishing characteristic of Christians. I'm all against marrying outside of the New Israel AKA Christianity but that is a different matter.

>>591068

It says be nice to widows. I guess I’m free to marry blacks now.

>>591071

That’s a lot of cognitive dissonance, friend.

>>591073

I would really like you to show me where I am wrong

>>591072

You still fail to understand why God commanded them to marry amongst themselves only in the Old Testament. They were the chosen line of Abraham. Their purpose was to bring forth Jesus Christ. And He has come and is Risen.

We are all one in Christ. There is no purity amongst bloodlines.

Titus 3:9

1 Timothy 1

>>591076

They say anyone of any race can be Christian and debating that is foolish. It doesn’t say anything about mixing.

>>591076

They denied and murdered Christ, and Christ denied them and told them they were of their father the devil. They are not of Abraham or of Moses.

Now, they follow the Talmud. It is the race worship all of /pol/ knows of. You are practicing it now with the white race.

>>591078

Because there is nothing sinful about it.

>>591079

>You are practicing it now with the white race.

Who'd want to be breeding with a tapir, ogre or dwarf?

>>591079

>You are practicing it now with the white race.

No, I'm just pointing out scripture says race-mixing is a sin.

>Because there is nothing sinful about it.

If you would rather pervert the teachings of your own Bible to suit the propaganda of the current times than believe the actual word then I can't help you.

>>591081

>scripture says race-mixing is a sin

And I explained to you why it was: because of the birth of Christ.

>pervert the teachings of your own Bible

I'm not perverting anything. I am not telling anyone who they are not to marry. If you want to marry white, then marry white. The only commandment for marriage to Christians is to not marry an unbeliever.

I am not a Leftist spreading the false gospel of diversity or the Mudslime raping of Europe. I'm only correcting an error spread by people like you.

>>588595

Oh look, the "but it's different, I only put my race first" argument. You still can't reconcile that with Christianity.

>>591082

Christ was the perfect, undefiled offering from God's chosen line of Abraham. The perfect sinless offering in place of our sins. The Son of the Living God.

That is why it was so important for them to marry only within themselves.

>>591082

>because of the birth of Christ.

Well thank goodness scripture says those laws expire when Jesus comes. Thank goodness it says those laws are only there for Jesus' bloodline. Oh wait, it doesn't say any of that.

>>591085

Communism is incompatible with Christianity.

>>591088

The Old Testament didn't "expire", it was fulfilled in Christ. In Christ we all belong to (not the Satanic Talmudic nation but the actual, spiritual) Israel, and any commandment not to intermarry with non-Israelites is therefore not for Christians a prohibition with regards to lineage and ethnicity, but with regards to faith. If you disagree that all Christians are grafted onto Israel as per Romans 11, demonstrate it using scripture.

>>591095

Religion isn't race. All are one in Christ doesn't mean we all larp as the same race to get around the law.

>>591098

What law? Man's law or God's law?

>>591100

He's been quoting the Bible for a while now, c'mon.

>>591101

And he, and apparently you, have been ignoring everything from the New Testament. I haven't denied races existing or that people should identify as something other than they are, but that has no bearing on marriage or the sinfulness thereof.

Neither you nor him have proven that it is a sin. In fact, you keep ignoring Christ's work on the cross.

>>591098

Show me in the Bible where we can derive the concept of race separate from lineage and birthright and a basis for dividing people into racial categories, that even in Christ this concept of race persists, and further a biblical prohibition of miscegenation with regards to said racial divisions specifically and not tribally (I'm taking your response to mean you in fact do not disagree with Paul on the point I raised) and I will accede to your viewpoint. I'll wait.

>>591102

Okay so it basically boils down to

>Your argument has no bearing because I don't AGREE with it yet, even if it has some biblical backing

You're just being annoying by not recognizing your opponent you know.

>>591106

Not him, but how many races, not tribes are actually in the Bible?

>>591111

Obviously the question of "race" is questionable because it is based on Darwinist scientific theories of different groups having evolved differently. The major division among peoples we see in the Bible are nations, of which there were 70 after the Flood. This is of course where the racialists jump in and start assigning peoples to whichever nations were blessed or cursed according to their sympathies (think black Israelites/curse of Ham type stuff), but which modern ethnic group belongs to which nation is meaningless speculation in view of the massive dearth of evidence to confidently assign nations to almost any people, and in light of 1 Peter 2, that Christians are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, and a holy nation unto themselves. Miscegenation is a whole other matter because nowhere in the Bible is interbreeding among non-Israelites remotely addressed (no real reason for it to be), and I'm not going to repeat myself on who counts as an Israelites.

>>591085

1 Timothy 5:8

But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.

>>591132

/thread

And if I'm not mistaken, the book of Tobit explicitly advises against race mixing.

>>591136

>book that isn't in the bible says something

>doesn't read the thread at all

Is this bait?

>>591132

I could object to what I presume is a completely off-base interpretation of the phrase "his own" there, being divorced of its wider context, but for the sake of argument, let's just pretend that Paul was defending racial preference (pretty amusing to attribute to the Jewish Apostle to the Gentiles, but I digress). Paul tells us to provide for our own and our house especially. Who belongs to our house? Our parents, spouse and children, of course, but Christians also belong to another house: the household of faith, which we are commanded to do good onto especially (Gal 6:10, also yes house[hold] is the same word in Greek). Now if we're to provide for our house especially, and we're to do good onto our household of faith especially, shouldn't we be putting our fellow Christians above those simply of our own nation? If we Christians are of the same household of faith, surely we should heed his warning across the Gospels that a house divided against itself shall not stand. Neither Jew nor Greek, all one in Christ.

>>591124

I think you've completely misinterpreted my point. I'm not saying it's impossible to distinguish between ethnic groups or that they don't exist, or really anything about ethnicity, I'm saying that the theories about how so-and-so people must be the descendants of Ham or of Shem or of whoever are almost always completely baseless (Jews traditionally being regarded as perfidious Israelites who worship their father Satan in their synagogues, and either as the chosen people who Christians should grovel before by Zionist fools or secret Turkic impersonators by 1488 types).

>>591106

>>591155

>Show me in the Bible where we can derive the concept of race separate from lineage

Race is inherent to family, tribe and nation lineage. You can say that nations in the same race are those which are genetically related. As the family, tribe and even nation can come into existence or end (see ethnogenesis), race represents the underlying grouping of blood and genetics which, at any one point in time can be subdivided into nations, and in principle each nation subdivided further down to single families. All these subdivisions may be loose and change gradually over generations, especially as languages change; however, the race is a genetic-based, objective definite division that never changes itself without mixing. It is what doesn't change with culture. It is possible to very easily determine racial classification even just by looking at differences in the skeleton between European, African and Asiatics, along with many other physical attributes that are always divided along racial lines. The meme going around these days is that it's all skin color and nothing else. False.

>that even in Christ this concept of race persists,

Well, first of all when you say "in Christ" you might be referencing Galatians 3:28 which says—

"There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus."

But notice that it also says there is neither male nor female. Modern feminists might agree, this means we should demand social equality. But what does the New Testament say elsewhere about women having authority over men (1 Tim. 2:12)? So then we cannot use Galatians 3:28 to conclude that all social equality must follow, and that all barriers between men and women must be removed in society and that all treatment of women as being who they are as different from men is evil. Quite the contrary. This is a total misinterpretation of the verse.

Further it must be said that neither is treating one's own family as more important than non-family considered favoritism. An example of being a respector of persons is when you favor the rich man for what he can give to you, see James 2:1-4. The fact you honor YOUR father and mother is not favoritism of this manner. Nor can you be blamed for providing for your own people more than for strangers. That's not discrimination, because we each have our own people. As it says in Acts 13:36 that David did. He served his own generation. Yet you can still teach the gospel to anyone equally as Paul did despite what he said in Romans 9:1-3 that he, personally, wanted especially that his kinsmen would be saved, though he knew that it was God's decision.

And of course Revelation 21:24-26 shows that you will forever be part of your nation. This is also where I disagree with people like Anderson because I have nothing to accuse my nation of, I just want them to repent and I always will. Save the accusation and being exposed for the individual evildoers and their own actions.

>>590782

>What is the jews aspect of the aggregate?

Linguistic intelligence. What

>>590811

is saying, however, is Calvinist heresy, considering that evil is simply a symptom of free will.

Exactly where in the bible does it say that Israels command of racial purity was fulfilled in Jesus? Also, if you think false jew edomites are the israel of the bible, you are deceived. There is no such thing as spiritual israel. There is physical israel and those grafted in. Its always been physical. Modern christianity is a lukewarm, satanic poison.

>>591168

>I have nothing to accuse my nation of

That's called pride. And you can already accuse your nation of that.

I don't know why you typed all of that in that way, like we're all retards. You seem adamant to make all of us here out to be some cuckservatives, asking for the raping of nations as the globalists aspire to happen. It's as another anon, said >>591054 you're trying to set up and accuse your opponent to be something you can attack rather than treat him as he is.

>>591197

Sure. Yet, without it there isnt an understanding of what good really is. A&E found out what evil is, and just because there wasnt an apparent evil beforehand doesnt mean it wasnt there. Free will includes the ability to choose evil.

>>591197

>Linguistic intelligence

Ah, right. Deceit and the poisoning of languge.

>racism is bad

<300 replies

Oh boy, /christian/ at it again

>>591372

>Tell me how you get this

Are completely incapable of reading Genesis 11 for yourself, or do you have to have a priest/pastor baby you?

<Genesis 11:4

>Come, let us build ourselves a city, with a tower that reaches to the heavens, so that we may make a name for ourselves

You all act as though you're not able to spiritually discern anything. You approach a topic as an autist would. None of you have done anything to supply evidence that Christians marrying Christians is a sin.

>Nationality is a spiritual consequence

Nations have come and gone, and God has been sovereign over it all. An individual is not changing a nation. Christ's kingdom is not of the earth, and we are not citizens of the world.

My original statement still stands as evident and true. Political consequences in the governments of men are not spiritual consequences in heaven.

>>591509

And please, spare me any more autism and obvious idiocy, such as

>so you're saying gay marriage is legal?

>so blah blah blah?

We're all following Scripture, so don't act stupid.

>>591509

>Are completely incapable of reading Genesis 11 for yourself, or do you have to have a priest/pastor baby you?

How do you get race from this? I can see languages but how race? I suppose what you've done is assume this must be where it comes from. It couldn't have come earlier, you assume.

>Christians marrying Christians is a sin.

It can be both a sin and destructive depending on who they are. For instance, I would never endorse breaking the age law even if I didn't agree with it. You are being way too black-and-white here, clear signs of spectrum thinking.

>Christ's kingdom is not of the earth, and we are not citizens of the world.

So then, radical feminism equality according to Galatians 3:28? I'm afraid what YOU have failed to supply evidence for why we can't discourage this. After all, this whole thread is basically a complaint saying nobody should even be allowed to say anything negative about it. Why so sensitive?

>>591075

They are both inbred and race-mixed, and they practice eugenics on others, namely the Ethiopian Jews.

>>588621

this /pol/ is just a bunch of LARPers reminder that the nazi government was a persecutor of Christianity

D&C shills going nuts in the anti-Christian thread on /pol/ right now. They like to hit here at the same time, so I guess just be on the lookout.

>>591797

Nobody who matters goes to 8/pol/ anymore. Mods killed it. 4/pol/ is the only /pol/ I care about.

>>591908

> he posted THAT pic as if it helps his argument

That pic is in fact proof that Hitler was a liar. Rosenberg, Himmler and Bormann were all put in high ranking positions by Hitler, and all were anti-Christian. Hitler was perfectly willing to tolerate in his ranks those who attack the ideas of Christianity.

>>591908

>If Hitler said it it must be true

>>591908

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mit_brennender_Sorge

" A threatening, though initially mainly sporadic persecution of the Catholic Church followed the Nazi takeover.[20] Hitler moved quickly to eliminate Political Catholicism. Two thousand functionaries of the Bavarian People's Party were rounded up by police in late June 1933, and that party, along with the national Catholic Centre Party, ceased to exist in early July. Vice Chancellor Franz von Papen meanwhile negotiated the Reichskonkordat Treaty with the Vatican, which prohibited clergy from participating in politics.[21] Kershaw wrote that the Vatican was anxious to reach agreement with the new government, despite "continuing molestation of Catholic clergy, and other outrages committed by Nazi radicals against the Church and its organisations""

>>588621

>None of them know anything about the true nature of Christianity

To turn the other cheek until there no longer are any Christians? To embrace the genocide that you are perpetrating in the West? You're so transparent, leftypol.

>>592139

You do realize that your own Roman church has defined what racism is and condemned it right? It is clearly condemned in the Second Vatican Council.

>>592375

Races are different. Yes. Treat them differently. I don't think anyone has suggested otherwise. It's always a LARPer such as >>591532

>>591081

trying to contort his opponent's views so he can attack the strawman.

>we are all created in the image of God

Then why aren't we all monoshitskin niggers?

What does it even mean to be made in the "image" of God?

>>588828

>HOWEVER, GOD'S IMAGE IS NOT SUBJECTIVE, BUT OBJECTIVE. Ergo, your argument is crap.

What if God is objective but we can only see him subjectively, even if we know that he's objective? So it's like, we're all "colourblind" so to speak with regards to our perception of God but we're also aware of the fact that we're colourblind regarding our perception, if that makes sense? We're all made in God's image so we all look at God and see our own race but we all know that everyone else is also experiencing the same illusion and that's because God's nature transcends our simple, mortal perception.

I remember reading some kind of Indian saying. A bunch of blind people are standing around an elephant. One blind person stands near the tusk and he says the thing being touched is hard, sharp and painful. Another person standing near the rear says the thing is warm but stinky. Another standing near the abdomen says that it's just warm and smooth. They're all, through touch, perceiving the same elephant but they can only "see" some small part of it.

Racism is a term coined by communists to shame a feeling, that when well ordained is good, prudent and desiderable, to have sympathy for what is like us suspicion of what is different.

The only purpose of such a thing is to create a ingrained sense of guilt over something that means nothing.

It only brings up comic scenes like we've been seeing in europe, of grown men being adopted as children by european couples. The european sees that boat full of africans and feels distrust. Immediatly, all demoralizing propaganda he watched sets in, and he feels guilty. Then he goes on to please the one he offended in thought.

>racism is a sin

How so?

>>588672

I look up the Greek original and decide for myself, but considering the only other occurrence of that word is in relation to a cup, and there it clearly means "within" I agree with you that "within" is the proper translation on this point.

>>606320

Not him, but the dictionary definition of racism is as follows:

>a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human racial groups determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to dominate others or that a particular racial group is inferior to the others.

Whether someone is white, black, arab, or anything else, they are all worthy of God's love and mercy. Note that I said Worthy, meaning that they have the potential to be embraced by Christ, but they must embrace Christ in return.

Nothing wrong with marrying within your race, I don't understand what all the concerns over racemixing are all about. If you don't want to marry someone who's not of your race, then more power to you.

Racism is unacceptable, but knowing that there are marked differences between the different people of the world is not racism.

>>588555

KJV also gets the translation of Luke 11:28 wrong. Don't idolize a translation. KJV is better than most english translations, but don't let it be the end of everything.

>this shill thread is still up a month later

>>606363

Some dumbass bumped it spewing halfchan apologetics. Just ignore it or bury it with other threads

>>606362

>who killed Christ?

Technically it was the romans, just saying

>>606408

That is not what Paul says

>>606362

Firstly anon, you completely ignored the points raised in the post you replied to, leading me to believe you have no arguments against them, because Hitler indeed lied. Secondly, even if you assumed that everyone Hitler killed was pure evil, killing evil people does not automatically make you righteous. Now I don't personally think most Jews are pure evil, any more than I believe everyone who rejects Christ is pure evil. But even if you personally do believe every single Jew is pure unredeemable evil, that in no way proves that Hitler was a good guy, because bad or misguided people frequently fight each other. Stalinists fight with Trotskyists, Sunnis fight with Shias, and centre right youtube atheists fight with far left youtube atheists. You might be able to decide that one group is less bad than another, but there's none of those groups are good.

>>588639

Western civilization (led by Whites for the majority of time) has been building up filth and neglecting God's calling. Instead of carrying on the work of the Missionary generation which has brought Christianity to the far reaches of the Earth fulfilling Jesus' commandment, instead you have turned a blind eye towards the holocaust which has been occurring since the 1970s with Roe vs. Wade and you have done absolutely nothing to uphold the sanctity of marriage (and no, it didn't just start with gay marriage legalization, but no-fault divorce and mass acceptance of adultery). You have turned your back on God, and God will turn His back on you. Time is running out, repent.

For if God did not spare the natural branches, neither will He spare you. Therefore consider the goodness and severity of God—severity toward those who fell, but goodness toward you, if you continue in His goodness. Otherwise, you also will be cut off. And these also, if they do not remain in unbelief, will be grafted in, for God is able to graft them in again. (Romans 11:21-23)

>>616958

You're right, I also think it's a punishment of God for our filth to let evil have power over us. We can still cry on this punishment (and wish he didn't happen), and denounce the evil people putting this upon us though. So white people should exist, but for this we should repent and become faithful again. I don't think the OP and other anti-racist will agree with this bad vision of immigration btw, so why bump this shitty propaganda thread ?

sage

>>588673

>Racism is a sin

Only in liberal western democracies.

Remember the Tower of Babel.

It is clearly God's will that we be diverse and spread in all corners of the Earth and not become a single race and culture.

Now you and people like you are hellbent on recreating that wicked dream, when it is in clear violation of god's will. You will be confused and scattered around the world.

God wants us to be different and this must be respected and protected for this world and all his creation is a gift to us and we must honor it.

You would destroy the beauty and diversity of this world in the name of equality, but equality is a false god. God is the only true god. And we must only be the same in worshipping him and nothing else.

>>606334

> they are all worthy of God's love and mercy.

Heresy None of us are worthy of his love and mercy. it is a privilege.

>>592182

>Second Vatican Council.

You mean that Council that totally corrupted the Church,

>>591532

>How do you get race from this?

Race is a direct result of what happened there you dimwit. It was crearly a result of God's will.

>>591230

>That's called pride. And you can already accuse your nation of that.

>Wanting your nation to always repent it's sins and not taking the self-righteous position of accusing!condemning them of a sin is pride

It is the exact opposite.

Pic related.

>>591058

>I care about the truth

nope, you care about what you want to be true

big difference

>Bible condemns discrimination based on race

how about you read that poor Bible once in a while?

>>617082

Damn

>>591060

You quoted everything from the Torah, when Jesus Christ came, He replaced the Old Covenant with the New Covenant. The Books of Acts further goes on to say that we are of one blood. In fact, if you read the Bible cover-to-cover, you'd understand that we humans are all descendants of Adam and Eve.