/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

>>567103

>, it means that the people who *do* them are more easily found and able to be ostracized.

So after working full time I come home and find that my house has been vandalized, I put on my detective hat and call my friends and we go out trying to solve crimes at night? No. I'm tired for that.

>>567106

Better give daddy state more power and bake the cake

>>567103

Catholic teaching has always been that a man is not free to choose slavery to sin. Also, it depends on how you define vice. Chesterton was given the title Defender of the faith by pope Pius XI even though he smoked so much he used to do the sign of the cross with a lit match in his hands. He also loved wine so much he said if angels gave you something else to drink you thank them and pour it down the sink.

>>567103

>On the other, it means that the people who *do* them are more easily found and able to be ostracized

But how is this possible in the context of digital media as the predominate choice of social interaction?

>>567106

Vice refers to sinful, yet not explicitly (traditionally) criminal offenses, along the lines of homosexuality, substance abuse, prostitution, and the like…

>>567114

I don't understand your point?

>>567115

>Vice refers to sinful, yet not explicitly (traditionally) criminal offenses, along the lines of homosexuality, substance abuse, prostitution, and the like…

better to make those things criminal offenses. I wouldn't want to go around town "ostracizing" hookers or druggies anyway. Rather they just get locked up or sent to some rehab asylum.

>>567117

If I don't want to fund that will you have men with guns come to my house to force me to?

>>567118

>that flag

>"rules and laws are oppressive, I just wanna be free to do what I want ;)"

okay sweetie, back to /lgbt/

>>567120

Will you assault me because I think a different quantity of wealth should be spent housing criminals?

>>567123

Please wear a train costume while you do

>>567108

>>567118

>>567125

>>567122

psssst… wanna know how I know you're a LARPer?

>>567126

How many times do I have to deal with this. I was chrismated by a priest in good standing with my bishop and regularly receive confession and communion. You can't do anything about that

>>567127

Why be a filthy liberturd when your theology teaches its model government?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symphonia_(theology)

>>567128

That will never happen again, and if by some miracle it did I wouldn't resist it

>>567127

>I once took this stuff seriously

Shame you don't anymore. Sage

>>567130

What are you on about?

>>567131

your stupid anti-authority, anti-gov, anti-king, anti-rules posting. In this thread, and others. Fantastic lolbertarian braindamage.

>>567140

You will never have a king, the nazis will fail, and distributism will never be a thing. Buy a gun and save up some food and water

>>567143

To be fair one of the other guys argued that exile was the correct alternative rather than ostracizing. (Though one rather… colorful fellow… suggested euthanasia, but I doubt that would go over well here as an alternative)