There's a legitimate case that KJV is an excellent translation - it is still the Authorized version, after all.
The question is what sources you admit in choosing what goes in - KJV uses Erasmus' TR, most modern bibles look for the oldest source available, and many of the early extant codices were from Egypt, so you may be getting a view from one see of early Christendom.
I think the sourcing has arguments with some merit justifying it, but I'm surprised more don't accept language updates - doth and hath are not required.
says an Anglican who goes to a right meet liturgy lol