Lets filioque again

Email
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Flag
Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf Max filesize is 16 MB. Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000. You may upload 5 per post.

File: 0876ff2a23be7b7⋯.jpg (136.79 KB, 951x1200, 317:400, The Grand Council.jpg)

Lets filioque again Christanon 11/07/17 (Tue) 17:35:19 455051 No.551612

>Ephesians 3:9

>And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ:

Basically saying that the holy spirit(In this case, creation) comes form the father(As always, God) through the son(As always, Jesus Christ), am I wrong?

Christanon 11/07/17 (Tue) 17:46:41 a5b696 No.551616

>>551612

The Holy Spirit isn't a creation, it's existed from everlasting like the Father and the Son

Christanon 11/07/17 (Tue) 17:47:29 bc0f19 No.551619

>>551616

>it

Christanon 11/07/17 (Tue) 17:48:56 a5b696 No.551620

>>551619

You're right, of course. He existed with the Father and the Son from everlasting

Christanon 11/07/17 (Tue) 17:52:22 455051 No.551622

>>551616

>The Holy Spirit isn't a creation

But its necessary for complete creation. God gave us the holy spirit to make us alive, so it makes sense to think that he also put the holy spirit to the world.

Yes I worded the OP incorrectly and wish to delete it but whatever lets just go with it

Christanon 11/07/17 (Tue) 19:09:10 7ca8d0 No.551640

>>551612

I mean kinda. Nothing inherently wrong with it. Wording could been better. But you are saying that ex Patre Filioque=ex Patre per Filium which is basically it so why not.

2025 can come soon enough.

Christanon 11/07/17 (Tue) 19:09:53 11919d No.551642

File: d43ac8e58dfef12⋯.png (473.97 KB, 525x700, 3:4, 346ce336954944103253058ce8….png)

Christanon 11/08/17 (Wed) 03:17:15 173a8f No.551949

>implying orthobros have a problem with From the father through the son

Christanon 11/08/17 (Wed) 03:24:12 37f354 No.551955

>>551612

>uses a mormon painting

Christanon 11/08/17 (Wed) 03:24:48 e154df No.551957

JOHN 15:26

It’s a quotation of scripture…you can’t freaking change it.

Christanon 11/08/17 (Wed) 08:24:08 4009ea No.552035

>>551612

That painting is Mormon, not Christian. If you're confused, research what they believe versus what the Bible teaches.

Christanon 11/08/17 (Wed) 10:01:22 bc0f19 No.552051

>>551949

>doesn't know "and the Son" means "through the Son"

Christanon 11/08/17 (Wed) 12:46:54 687a01 No.552072

File: b275133613abe90⋯.png (237.78 KB, 484x533, 484:533, 1422305708326.png)

>>551955

>>552035

Even if its Mormon what is the problem with it? There are people in heaven y'know.

The only "problem" I see is that God's face can be seen, which implies that it happens after the Book of Revelations.

Christanon 11/08/17 (Wed) 13:03:45 354859 No.552076

And I thought the throne river argument was bad

>>552051

>doesn't know there is hundreds of years of history involved in this in which Latins pulled bamboozle swicharoos

>>552072

It depicts the Father, which is for them a theological statements as they believe the Father has a body like the one we will have. Absolute heresy