>>545719
>>545267
The first image is as logically consistent as the doctrine of filioque and papal supremacy.
>We disrupted the holy liturgy so epic dude xD
>We walked behind the iconostasis, like you're not supposed to do that xD we are sooo bad
>next day "you're excommunicated t-too pope!!!"
except it took months for a message to get from Constantinopolis to Rome so how could the Pope get his excommunication the next day?
>take the Apostle's relics back to Rome
back? The relics never were in Rome in the first place.
>lol we took their relics xD
and sold most of them, not even to the church. Truly the defenders of the True Faith.
>We raped nuns, dude. So epic xD
beyond sad
>14th century
>Ottomans closing on Constantinopolis
fifteenth century ftfy
>Russians get patriarchate in 1589
>Patriarch Nikon in 15th century
unless the patriarch can travel back through time, no. 16th century ftfy
Written by a historically illiterate larper. I would advice him to get church history from somewhere else than 4/pol/. Then again I doubt he even read the Bible first.