/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

My OC!

Slightly confused what your saying, but what I would say is that imagining sex with others is almost certainly lust, but imagining raising kiddos with someone or going on a nice date or something isn't necessarily bad, but it should be something that helps you peruse doing that with a real Godly woman, not something to get caught up in and do nothing

OP because it's a James 1:14 since you have not known romans 7:7 your ok. If you had exodus 20:17 then it would have been a james 1:15 fullfilled because of the carnal fullfillment in ephesians 2:3. So don't act on acts 20:33-34 if you a 2 timothy 2:4 or otherwise. But if you james 1:14 in a galations 5:17 fashion then you are fine.

>>543288

Please consider not posting like this. I honestly hope to not sound mean as I have no reason to think you're anything other than a good guy, but this posting style is odd and not really conductive to conversation

>>543284

In my opinion, Its bad for you if you go down on fantasy road and you become "self-sufficient" with fantasies and losing desire to real women and marriage. hikikomori

>>543284

the most hilarious thing about these girlfriend images is that none of the stuff anons put in there sound remotely like anything a real girl would say

>>543323

Of course not, those were things I would love to hear a girl say. I've nearly never heard a girl say anything uplifting to me in a romantic context

>>543326

women want to hear you say that stuff, not the other way around

>>543330

Why not both?

>>543284

that sort of daydreaming sounds like "coveting" your neighbor's goods, specially if the girl is already taken by another man.

If you fancy a girl then take the steps to find out if she is available, so you can date/marry her. Otherwise youre torturing yourself with false "waifu" hopes.

>>543290

>i'm too lazy to look up Bible verses and want you to talk to me in ad hominims and useless vain sweet talking that I can ignore without feeling guilty, the post

AND I, brethern, when I came to you, came not with excellency of speech or of wisdom, declaring unto you the testimony of God. For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified. And I was with you in weakness, and in fear, and in much trembling. And my speech and my preaching was not with enticing words of man's wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power: That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God. 1 corinthians 2:1-5

Thank God, I thought I was the only one.

>>543345

I think he means to say that it's difficult to follow your meaning when you place citations instead of words. It's difficult to understand and doesn't help convey your point so effectively.

>>543284

It doesn't make sense and romanticism is a poetic movement and nothing else.

Please focus on relevant skills,issues or hobbies rather than abject daydreaming.

>>543284

THINK

Also, depends on the woman. Then it's not so much "sinful" as it is "degenerate", insomuch that it could lead to trouble; a degenerated quality of life. This is assuming you go after a girl who has some glaring red flags, like

>pants

>visibly older than you

>cellphone out everywhere

>>543345

Is that anon even OP?

>>543358

Go use the QTDDTOT.

>>543404

>>543404

Never knew what it stood for, but google had the answer.

Thanks! I'll delete my post and post it there.

I get you brother, but it's a bad to fantasize about waifus, whether lustful or not. Thinking about it too much can put you in some bad positions. It will also reinforce some bad habits in the context of dating/marriage.

>>543392

Romanticism IS a poetic movement.

You may be referring to the noun "romance"

Sometimes when I see a qt I imagine her wearing a veil and going to church with her.

>>543619

>implying a skirt isn't part of the outfit I imagine.