[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / bbbb / f / htg / maka / sonyeon / strek / tijuana / wai ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Email
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Christchan is back up after maintenance! The flood errors should now be resolved. Thank you to everyone who submitted a bug report!

File: 16ec348ec4fedd4⋯.jpg (135.17 KB, 960x486, 160:81, 1424712615458.jpg)

7a5b05 No.538802

I was curious, are there any Churches or Priests that follow the apparent /christian/ creeds?

Like the "turn the other cheek" thing. Most Churches would agree it means to accept it when someone is aggressive, so I don't actually see /christian/'s interpretation being very popular.

Anyone?

244f45 No.538809

>>538802

Go punch a priest and find out for yourself.


fffb53 No.538821

>>538802

what do you think we think that passage means?


a50358 No.538822

File: 485e1e3b7f56e63⋯.jpg (17.81 KB, 376x263, 376:263, NaziPriestsSaluteHitler.jpg)


7a5b05 No.538824

>>538821

Every time its mentioned, people talk about how in Rome, slapping someone with the back of their hand would imply one thing but slapping with the front would mean another, and they weren't allowed to slap with the left hand, so turning your cheek would be a smart response to a aggressive person.

Why are you asking me this, now?


fffb53 No.538833

>>538824

that's silly.

is there an accompanying explanation along those same lines for the next verse?

>And if someone wants to sue you and to take your tunic, give him your coat also. (Matthew 5:40)


7a5b05 No.538838

>>538833

Yes. "The jews would have understood this one- I forgot how it went, but it was good"

There was one for the "go a extra mile" thing RIGHT after that one, too.

"During ancient times, a roman soldier could ask a citizen of a ransacked city to walk a mile with his former items, but no more. If he went to walk a further mile after that, he would be very embarrassed, for his commanding officer could beat the soldier for going past his seniority".

So its about not fighting back physically, but being smarter than your opponent.


9812c7 No.538853

>>538822

Boi >:3


631fab No.538859

>>538838

'll only quote an anon who have a good insight on the context of these specifics verses found in the Holy Scripture.

>"offer no resistance" is a bad translation of the Greek word ἀντιστῆναι. ἀντιστῆναι means to stand in opposition, it derives from military usage. "Do not square off against an evildoer" would be a better translation. "Resist" in English implies all methods, the original Greek implied only foregoing physically forceful resistance.

The three examples that follow show you how, as Christians, we are supposed to resist an evildoer, as opposed to "squaring off against" them:

>1)TURN THE OTHER CHEEK: Backhands were the way to dominate a wife or slave. Open-handed slaps were a challenge to an equal. Hitting left-handed was unthinkable, social condemnation would fall on the hitter. So, by turning the other cheek your assailant must either: be ostracized, stop hitting you, or acknowledge you as an equal. You've won.

>2) GIVE HIM YOUR CLOAK TOO- This was a reference Jews would've understood. Exodus 22:26 reads - If you take your neighbor's cloak as a pledge, return it by sunset, because that cloak is the only covering your neighbor has. What else can they sleep in? When they cry out to me, I will hear, for I am compassionate. It was to shame the creditor who was demanding your clothes by reminding him and anyone watching that God will hear your cries.

>3) GO THE EXTRA MILE - This is a reference to the Roman law of impressment. A Roman soldier traveling in a subdued country could demand any civilian carry his pack for one mile. If, however, he made them carry it further than one mile, he could be beaten severely for it. Thus, by attempting to go the 2nd mile, the soldier is placed in the comical position of having to beg you to put it down lest his commanding officer see and get the wrong idea.

Christ doesn't want us to be doormats, he wants us to prevail against evil. Don't fight evil on its own terms - that's the message.


7a5b05 No.538860

>>538859

Yes, this.

But back to the main point of the thread, does any Church or Temple preach this?


244f45 No.538862


19f6f4 No.538882

File: dc8f38563e6a2f2⋯.jpeg (34.54 KB, 577x414, 577:414, received_845177932296793.jpeg)

>>538860

>tfw your church doesn't teach this and instead, preaches that new age, postmodernist, heretical, hippy bs (baloney sandwich)


584244 No.538886

>>538859

Very interesting, can someone cap this?


fffb53 No.538888

>>538859

that's so dumb though, the passage is obviously about the whole 'eye for an eye' thing being done away with, that we shouldn't seek vengeance.

with this interpretation it's no longer about not seeking revenge, but about seeking revenge in a passive aggressive way.


7a5b05 No.538897

File: 1df0d7a28492294⋯.jpg (109.78 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, 8968c2c74420c1c39674a9f8fa….jpg)

>>538888

>The lord gives a situation which perfectly demonstrates what you should do, lowering the arrogance of your enemy without increasing your own

>OH wow whoa there why the passive aggressiveness?


fffb53 No.538905

>>538897

you're right, i see it now.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / bbbb / f / htg / maka / sonyeon / strek / tijuana / wai ]