/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

>baptists will defend this

The fucking fedora posts under the image is what boils my blood. Absolute tactless rude feckless heathens. It's wrong for me to wish Judgement on so many

>muh community

>muh religious tolerance

>seeking help from the (((secular state))) to uphold (((religious liberties)))

I'm starting to get really tired of this attitude.

Christians are always under the sentence of death from worldly powers, and ought never to expect anything from worldly powers but condescension and scorn. Are we so complacent that we are surprised when they attack us?

>>536116

You are right, it's ignorancy, apostasy and disastrously lax catechism. Luxuries make a people soft. Let's not forget that Sodom's other sins were fulness of bread, a lack of charity, pride and wealth.

>If it were a mosque this would be world news. If a persecuted group were truly persecuted they would not receive world support, aid, news etc. They would be persecuted, and not a word would be said.

With respect, if my horse had wheels it'd be a bike. It doesn't matter. Islam is worldly and so it's loved by the world. We are not interested in it other than as another vehicle for Satan to try to fight us.

I'm not saying it's a good thing that happened but not bad either. That's not what Mary looked like and is a graven image.

The "whore" part though is very wrong since she wasn't.

> >>536103 banned even though he was right

I mean I also think that it doesn't matter since while I wouldn't want someone to desecrate the the crunch, Jesus and Mary faced many adversities in their life, and in this stance we just discovered another enemy

>>536124

>Aryan Jesus

My sides

>>536103

You were right, lol

>>536136

>>536147

I'm not defending it though because they're still implying Mary was a whore even though that isn't Mary they still are trying to say that.

>>536103

I’m not sure why the mods are so uptight around here. Some baptists believe that the Catholic Church is the whore of Babylon, and that the Catholic version of Mary is Semiramis. Some baptists would definitely defend this

>>536154

I got banned for saying idolatry is a sin(the context was someone telling me to go to a catholic church)

>>536154

Posts like that aren't making it any easier.

>>536157

Who gives a shit? Mods need to stop getting offended.

Then again, Christianity is not very compatible with the general userbase of 8ch so maybe its a useless move.

>>536147

Obvious false flag. No baptist would call Mary a whore, although they may call a certain mariolatrous Revelation 17 church which shall remain nameless a whore.

>>536165

Meanwhile baptists contradict all the early Christians. The ones who actually went through suffering

>>536165

Chapter 66. Of the Eucharist

And this food is called among usΕὐχαριστία [the Eucharist], of which no one is allowed to partake but the man whobelieves that the things which we teach aretrue, and who has been washed with the washing that is for the remission of sins, and unto regeneration, and who is so living as Christ has enjoined. For not as common bread and common drink do we receive these; but in like manner as Jesus Christour Saviour, having been made flesh by theWord of God, had both flesh and blood for our salvation, so likewise have we been taught that the food which is blessed by theprayer of His word, and from which our blood and flesh by transmutation are nourished, is the flesh and blood of thatJesus who was made flesh. For theapostles, in the memoirs composed by them, which are called Gospels, have thus delivered unto us what was enjoined upon them; that Jesus took bread, and when He had given thanks, said, This do in remembrance of Me, Luke 22:19 this is My body; and that, after the same manner, having taken the cup and given thanks, He said, This is My blood; and gave it to them alone. Which the wicked devils have imitated in the mysteries of Mithras, commanding the same thing to be done. For, that bread and a cup of water are placed with certain incantations in themystic rites of one who is being initiated, you either know or can learn.

http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0126.htm

If you are a Baptist. This man is an apostate heathen

>>536165

I didn't though. Read the whole comment.

>>536166

WHAT

>>536166

>The Chad Worshipper

>>536154

I don't understand the forced faux ecumenism here and now the appeasement policy towards the most disruptive group on this board that does not even follow nicean Christianity (hell most protestants don't follow nicaen Christianity because they don't believe in the communion of saints). I know the mods want to prove how tolerant they are and how they are not all catholics and this just reminds me of secular virtue signalling. Soon we're going to have christian atheist mods, Muslim mods, Arian mods and lesbian mods just to show to whingy shitposting baptists that were not catholic. Just Anglican my shit up FAM.

>>536103

Does he get his banned removed for actually speaking in the spirit of truth and not bearing false witness?

>>536232

Ironic all the local prots and loyalists idolise Ian Paisely for denouncing the Pope as the anti-christ, only to see him succeeded twice. The main point of the anti christ being that there is only one and then the end.

>>536368

I'd say yes, but lynching is unlawful and breaking the law is for sinners. In all honesty, we should live in a society where the penalty for such acts is death.

>>536102

I don't care when they destroy statues as we don't place value in physical idols. There was even a verse stating that Jesus himself doesn't care. They did intend to offend God though.

There's one thing that I find amusing about it. Those types mock people for being virgins or for not having a "good" sex life, yet they innately acknowledge that being promiscuous is a negative thing. That's why they threw the pejorative at Mary.

>baptists defended this

>>536412

Railing accusation against Christians accusing them of hating Mary. I'd tell you what to do with yourself as well, now that you've said that, but that's against the rules.

>>536308

Seems like a lot of hoops to jump through to justify their world view though.

Can't go round calling someone 'thee' antichrist with massive conviction only to have the so called anti-christ succeeded several times.

Then to go on to have talks to negotiate and create harmony with the so called anti-christ communities.

And to hold a reformer position for so long about the Church built upon the rock being the Anti-Christ dynasty but no other Revelation based prophecys happening, despite an Anti-Christ meaning to signal a near end.

Feels sadman.

>>536308

Yes, this is what all the major reformation figures taught; that the antichrist is the office of the papacy (not that any one particular pope is the antichrist). Antichrist meaning 'in place of Christ' rather than merely against Christ and the popes blasphemously proclaiming themselves the 'vicar of Christ', Christ's earthly representative.

>>536516

>And to hold a reformer position for so long about the Church built upon the rock being the Anti-Christ dynasty but no other Revelation based prophecys happening, despite an Anti-Christ meaning to signal a near end.

The traditional protestant eschatology is historicism which espouses that Bible prophecy has been progressively fulfilled throughout the events of church history and is still being fulfilled.

For example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horae_Apocalypticae

>>536512

lmao

>>536520

You have your beliefs my Baptist friend and I assume consistent in them. I am just rather critical of the character of Ian Paisely and his poorly lived life.

>536136

>not bad

What are you talking about? How is defacing statues of saints anything but evil?

>>539914

fuck, meant >>536136

>>536232

>dat gnostic devil beard

Please tell me these people don't actually walk out like that.

>>536103

>>539985

Banned for speaking the truth.

>>539989

Are you serious now? Are you going to destroy statues of angels too now?

Before answering remember how in the Ark of Moses, God said that the chair should be adorned with two cherubim. (Make two cherubim of gold—make them of hammered work—at the two ends of the cover. 19 Make one cherub at one end and the other cherub at the other end; of one piece with the cover shall you make the cherubim at its two ends. 20 The cherubim shall have their wings spread out above, shielding the cover with their wings. They shall confront each other, the faces of the cherubim being turned toward the cover. 21 Place the cover on top of the Ark, after depositing inside the Ark the Pact that I will give you. 22 There I will meet with you, and I will impart to you—from above the cover, from between the two cherubim that are on top of the Ark of the Pact…)

>>540004

Are you threatening the board?

>>540007

just stating the facts. this place is cancer now. tbh it was even better back when there were tripfags here, thats how shit this place is

>>536154

>Some baptists believe that the Catholic Church is the whore of Babylon,

I think it may have been because his post was trying to start a flamewar. At least that's what it looks like.

>>540007

< threatening

>thinks some random hacker did that to /atheism/

>doesn't realise the BO did it

Are you willing me to be banned for threatening the board?

I'm not, but I am getting to the point where I am hoping it to happen.

Also this >>540013

>>540008

>I'll be banned too, don't worry.

That's where we will disagree. There is unfortunately bias and once it's crept in, and emphatically denied, it's too late to undo.

The board is now destined to repeat 2015/6. We had a good short run.

>>540008

>I'll be banned too, don't worry.

>I'll

Sorry, I read that as "this will". I'm a noob.

>>540044

>Are you willing me to be banned for threatening the board?

No, I asked a question. Have you considered medication for your paranoia?

>>540053

How can you seriously read

>Are you threatening the board?

and NOT think is is being said in an accusatory tone?

>>540004

>toxic

TRIGGERED

>>536102

But what are we going to do about it? How do we work against to prevent this?

>>540055

Because I'm not paranoid.

>>539989

>idols

>statues of the Holy Mother of God

>the same thing

>>540088

gah, can't link posts for some reason

>>539985

>>536138

There's quite a few paintings of baby Jesus with blonde hair.

>>540061

>the word "threatening", as in "are you threatening me", is not an implied accusation and anyone who thinks so is paranoid

>meanwhile, the sky is pink and water is dry

>>540058

Victors are never willing to see their abuses

>>540088 >>540089

>gah, can't link posts for some reason

Yes you can

But those links are for deleted posts

how do prots even exist? yeah I guess all the ecumenical concils don’t matter? They LITERALLY defined what it meant to be Christian.