[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/c89/ - C Programming

No Meme Languages Allowed
Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


File: f12990081f54f6f⋯.png (89.6 KB,508x599,508:599,508px_GNU_Compiler_Collect….png)

7f91b7 No.22

Good day anons,

Recently discovered this board and was immediately intrigued.

I've been programming using C99 for the last year, writing a assembler for my custom cpu arch. Has been one of the most informative experiences, learned a great deal about C in that time (but of course still have long to go).

My question in particular is about GCC 2.95.

What happened?

What paradigm shift occurred that caused the fear of the undefined?

The gnu changelog doesn't mention anything particularly pozzed:

https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/gcc-2.95/features.html

Also noticed LFS documentation (albeit dated) that mentioned "that the kernel developers have certified GCC-2.95.3 as the preferred compiler for compiling the [linux] kernel".

https://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/5.1/general/gcc2.html

Thanks for reading anons.

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.


[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]