/animu/ - Anime & Otaku Culture

Whatever, here goes, in parts:

https://my.mixtape.moe/mmpkzt.pdf

The Justice ministry.

Police- and Punishmentdepartment

Slotsholmsgade 10

1216 Copenhagen K (if you're gonna send any mail, I suggest the original Danish address).

Re: Request for comment regarding sex-dolls that look like children, and fictional child-pornography.

The Justice Ministry has in writing (this "writing" is a noun) of 15. february 2017 to Sexological Clinic and Visitations- and Treatment Network (their own translation: "Mental health services in the Capital Region of Denmark"), requested a comment that can illuminate:

First off, whether possession of sex-dolls that look like children, can lead persons to commit sexual assaults (the exact legal definition is of course iffy, but the writer probably didn't worry about exact legal terms themselves), or if such possession can prevent people with sexual thoughts of children from committing assaults on children.

Secondly, whether fictional child pornography, that aren't realistic portrayals and thus don't appear in the same way or close to the same way as on photographs and film, can lead persons to commit sexual assaults on children.

In relation to the request can be informed, that the Visitations- and Treatment Network in 2016 was host for 14. conference in International Association for the Treatment of Sexual Offenders (IATSO) with the title: Desistance from Sexual Offending - About Treatment and Other Effective Approaches. Here a part of the world's leading researchers had been present, and digital assaults on children was the focus of many of the speeches (not sure how to translate this one, what do you call a speech at a conference that's part of a debate) and discussions.

In connection with the reply to the request from the Justice Ministry, contact has been made with these colleagues and experts abroad. There has furthermore been been made a comprehensive literature search.

Whether the use of fictional pictures and sex-dolls increases the risk of committing sexual assaults among persons with sexual thoughts of children, is not directly informed in scientific research, research that is relevant to the questions will be examined. (this sentences is rather vague and unclear in the original Danish too).

Internationally one speaks of Child Pornography (CP) or Child Sexual Exploitation Material (CSEM), in Denmark called "childporn" ("børneporno", alternatively) or "pornographic pictures of children" (PBB). Furthermore is spoken of Narrative Child Sexual Exploitation Material (N-CSEM) in danish, also called "fictional childporn", which can be invented stories or "fictional pornographic pictures of children" (F-PBB), which consists of drawn or artificially produced/manipulated picture materials. F-PBB is, unlike PBB, not illegal in Denmark.

Sex-dolls were first produced in Japan in the 1980's. They were back then made of plastic, but nowadays they're made of silicone, which can absorb heat and has greater elasticity. Sex-dolls that look like children, have thus gained a more realistic appearance and gives a more realistic sensation. It has not been possible to find scientific literature regarding sex-dolls that look like children. One can assume that considerations that are expressed in the comparison between F-PBB and PBB, can be applied in the comparison between consumption of sex-dolls that look like children, and contact-assault on children.

In the following, much of the newest research in the area of PBB will be briefly referenced. Here there will be focused on research publicized since Sexological Clinic's last reply of 17. September 2010 on the request of the Justice Ministry for comment regarding fictional child pornography.

It is rare that you see persons convicted for PBB transition to contact sexual assault (Neutze et al. 2012).

The group of persons that use PBB can be divided in two. One group could be called fantasy-driven, where PBB is used to help or support a sexual fantasy or is seen of part of a hoarding disorder (closest thing I've quickly been able to find on the net that might be a thing, but translated directly: "collector-mania"). Another group, contact-driven, where PBB er is functionally and directly related to sexual contact-assaults. PBB users that have never committed assaults, have a different psychological profile than persons that have committed contact-assaults. Those who have never committed assault have, as a group considered, met less adversity in life, are more socially isolated, have difficulty maintaining personal relationships and have less of a tendency to justify their behavior than those who have committed assault (Merdian et al. 2016).

(That "writing" earlier can just be changed to letter, though it's not necessarily really the same)

Bartels and Merdian sum up the theories that regard PBB users. Very little is know about the group of fantasy-driven PBB users that don't show sign of transitioning to contact-assaults. There are described five underlying perceptions that can play a part: (1) an unhappy world, (2) can't control oneself - describes one self as dependent, (3) children are described as sexual objects, (4) minimizing or denial of the damage he inflicts and (5) sees oneself as a collector. This combined with the internet being easily accessible, and that you can have a perception of being anonymous when online. It is described that PBB users often are missing positive relations to others, aren't good at participating in society (in a social sense, but could also be understood in a broader sense, being unsuccessful) and are afraid of being stigmatized.

Most PBB users don't progress til contact-assault on children. Currently, substantial anti-sociability, deviant sexual interests and access to children the clearest predictors that a PBB user is in danger of transitioning to contact-assaults on children. PBB can have different function for different people, and different function for the same person in different contexts (Merdian et al. 2016).

In a meta-analysis including 24 studies, Seto et al. found that 5% of 2.630 online abusers within a follow-up time of 1,5-6 years were convicted of one or another sexual crime. One 2% were convicted of contact-assault on children. Regarding online abusers, a tenth (12%) had earlier had officially registered contact-assault (unclear whether the author meant the abuser had themselves been the victim of assault before, or committed. assault before). The number with former contact-assaults rose to 55% when one included what the men informed on questioning or after polygraph test. There are studies where both fewer and more self-inform of contact-assault (Seto et al. 2011).

Merdian and coworkers have conducted research regarding so-called cross-over from PBB use til sexual assaults on children. That is, persons that go from having looked at and in some cases distributed PBB, fabricated by others, to committing sexual assault on a child themselves. In a larger meta-analysis was found that 12% of PBB users earlier had convictions for sexual contact-assault. If one included self-reporting instances, it was 17% that had committed contact-assault on children earlier (Merdian et al. 2017; Seto et al. 2011).

I'm gonna take a break now, will continue later.

>>91195

And by break, I mean going to get another four hours sleep, go to school, and we'll see then.

>>91187

Doing G-ds work, anon.

>>91195

Holy shit anon, I never thought someone would do it, thanks, a lot.

>>91183

It's kind of terrible, I guess I could do it interpreting what google throws, but a translation from a native would be the ideal.

>>91160

The commies can argue about lolicon when they get their crime rates below Japan's. Until they do that they can fuck off and go eat their own shit in hell. Research comes from people, and people are fucking retarded, biased pieces of shit and wrong about everything, especially in academia, so I don't really trust them either way. There is almost always an agenda unless the result doesn't matter and no one actually cares, at least nowadays, and most of the time the preferred result will be the one that can be used as an excuse for not leaving people alone, and for destroying people's lives for imaginary thought crimes.

Alright, I''l be getting back to it now. Sorry about the delay.

>>91352

weNativesNow.jpg

>>91194

(cont.)

Faust et al. examined persons released from jail in the US in the period 2002-2005. 428 people released after incarceration exclusively for crimes related to PBB (did not have convictions for contact-assault), along with 210 released after convictions exclusively for contact-assault (had no convictions for PBB). These groups were different in all demographic variables. PBB users were on average 4 years older after release and 10 years older in relation to the first conviction for one crime or another. PBB users were often whiter and had more often been married and in employment at the time of arrest for the current criminality (it's a semantically clunky and vague sentence in the original text, too), they more rarely had a substance abuse problem and had more rarely themselves been subject to sexual assaults as children. They had also more rarely committed other crimes. Consistently with other studies, Faust et al. found that that PBB users recidivated (fancy word for "relapsed") less frequently than contact-assaulters. 3% of online sex offenders compared to 5,7% of contact-assaulters had, after 1-9 years, recidivated with contactt-assault on children. And 1,6% and 0% respectively had recidivated to PBB (doesn't make sense in the original text either). A comparison was made between PBB users and contact-assaulters. When controlled for background variables, contact-assaulters had a much greater risk of being arrested for new sexual, violent and/or other criminality than PBB users. PBB users generally had few new assaults (Faust et al. 2015).

PBB users differentiate themselves from contact-assaulters by, on average, being older, less often seeing themselves as part of a minority, more often having a higher education and access to computers either at work or privately and otherwise more rarely having engaged in crime before. Furthermore was found that PBB users were more sexually deviant, but had fewer deviant views of children (Babchishin et al. 2011).

Seto describes a strong correlation between pedophilia or hebephilia (sexual attraction to children in puberty, 11-14 years old) wth PBB use (Blanchard et al. 2007; Seto et al. 2015, Seto 2017) (no shit, Sherlocks). PBB users that have been convicted for contact-assault before, have a higher risk of committing new sexual offenses compared to those that have only used PBB.

If you guys have any questions or see any typos, missing translations or shit grammer, by all means, let me know.

Note that I'm not exactly educated in the finer legal definitions of "sex offense" or "sexual crime", whether in Danish code of law or another country's, or if they are different, and I probably use them interchangeably somewhere in here.

Oh, and apparently ephebophilia is the attraction to 15-19 year olds, in case you were wondering after the mention of hebephilia.

>>91361

Well, the report sure doesn't seem to concern itself much about female pedophilia, so I guess there's that agenda present.

>>91375 (cont.)

Bailey et al. have made an internet study about 1102 men, all sexually attracted to children, 15% stating that they had been arrested or convicted for sexual assaults against children or PBB crime. They found that men who'd repeatedly had employment involving children, multiple times had been in love with children, and men that had often struggled to not commit assault on children, more often had been arrested or convicted. In contrast, they did not find that a permissive attitude regarding sex between children and adults or frequent sexual fantasies involving children increased the risk of committing assault (Bailey et al. 2016).

Generally, not much is known about which factors increase the risk of committing a new sexual crime, whether it's PBB or contact-assault, when considering persons who've only committed online sexual crimes. Kuhle et al. have made a study of 190 adult men diagnosed with pedophilia or hebephilia and without current convictions for sexual crimes or psychiatric disorder. They found that especially a sexual preoccupation, hypersexuality, was strongly correlated to assault on children, especially in the group that had both committed contact-assault and PBB (Kuhle et al. 2017),

The instruments developed for individuals with contact-assault have little predictive value for PBB users. An instrument had been developed, the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT), for risk-evaluation of individuals convicted for PBB. Preliminary studies show that CPORT isn't as good at predicting new criminal behavior when applied to individuals that exclusively have committed PBB crimes, whereas it better at predicting new sex crimes when applied to individuals who've also committed contact-assaults (Seto and Eke 2015) (more directly translated to "persons who've also had contact assault" and it could possibly mean people who've been assaulted themselves, but all this is probably just the translator being autistic). Der exists no instruments or systematic knowledge that can predict whether people that have used F-PBB or childlike sex-dolls commit sexual crimes.

Crookes et al. have made a smaller study where they attempt to define F-PBB, and describe the difference between persons who use F-PBB and PBB. It involves interviews with 11 professionals who work with sex offenders that have used PBB, and 11 men who've been convicted for possession, distribution or production of PBB. There are pointed out individual differences in what significance F-PBB can have on each person. The 11 professional participants find that caution should be taken in regards to criminalizing F-PBB, due to a lack of knowledge about what damage such materiel causes. Of particular importance is the need for research about what influence and role F-PBB has in whether sexual crimes are committed or not, before recommendations are made to politicians and therapists (Hald et al. 2013).

>>91379

>Der exists

God dammit, talk about Danglish

There exists.

Anyway, I'm going home and probably gonna read

https://www.fanfiction.net/s/6734329/19/Empire-s-Son

for a while, can highly recommend. Be back in a few hours, shouldn't be more.

>>91380

>"Be back in a few hours, shouldn't be more."

>It's been over 12 hours.

>>91468

The UN got him

>>91380

>>91468

>>91471

RIP Danon. ;_;

F

>>91504

There are weebs all around the world and in every country. Anime really isn't an obscure interest anymore.

>>91545 (cont.)

To conclude, there is to our knowledge still no scientific studies that directly casts light on the presented questions. Therefore, there is also no documentation that use of fictional pictures of sexual assaults on children, or use of sex-dolls that look like children, i.e. use of materials produced and utilized with actual children being exposed to violations, alone can lead people to commit sexual assaults on children. Research furthermore indicates that people who exclusively deal with pornographic pictures of children has a lower risk of recidivating, and a small risk of being convicted of contact-assault, compared to those who already has convictions for contact-assault and pornographic pictures of children. Whether possession of fictional pornographic pictures of children and/or sex-dolls increases or decreases the risk of new criminality, we know very little about at the current time.

If one presumes that there are similarities with what has been found in the study regarding use of porn, film and computer games with violent content, and pictures with violence, it can be assumed that there is a group, who is sexually attracted to children, where fictional child porn and sex-dolls can act prophylactically (TL: this means preventatively) to activities where children are directly involved. But there is probably also a group, whereof many have previous convictions, where such fictional material can contribute to a continuation of the deviant interest in children.

Ellids Kristensen

Chief Physician, clinical lector

coordinator for the visitation- and treatment network

Susanne Bengtson

Cand.psych., ph.d., senior researcher

Retspsykiatrisk ambulatorium

Aarhus Universitetshospital, Risskov

Thorkil Sørensen

Professor, dk. med.

(and the references shouldn't require translation, they all sem to be in English).

>>91547

I only started gorging anime in 2005. A few guys watched it back then over here. Pretty normal by now.

>>91504

I didn't know we'd been cool since the Anglo torched and stole our fleet in 1807.

>>91554

You guys gave the world Soren Kierkegaard so that's pretty cool.

Anyway, continuing on: https://my.mixtape.moe/hibgjg.pdf

The Ministry of Justice

The Department of Law

Slotsholmsgade 10

1216 København K / Copenhagen

Re. Request for comment regarding fictional child porn.

The Ministry of Justice has in letter of 23. June 2010 to Sexological Clinic and Visitations- and Treatment Network, (TL: Or "Mental health services in the Capital Region of Denmark") requested a comment that can inform whether the possession, or similar, of fictional child porn, that is not realistic depictions, and that appear in the same way or somewhat same way as photographs or similar, can lead persons to commit sexual assaults on children.

Respondents have, in relation to the reply of above-mentioned, contacted foreign colleagues and experts. There has moreover been made a comprehensive literature search. Furthermore, several staff members of the Sexological Clinic and Visitations- and Treatment Network have, from 1.-4. September 2010, participated in the 11th IATSO (International Association for the Treatment of Sexual Offenders) Conference. The title of the convention, which was held in Oslo, was "New perspectives in sex offender treatment: Restorative justice, legal questions and humanistic approach as challenges to therapy" (TL: Authors cursive here). Relevant research presented at this conference is referred to in this reply.

We've had to recognize, that to the best of our knowledge, there does not exist scientific studies relating to the asked question, and so there does not exist documentation that use of fictional pictures of sexual assaults on children, so-called "child porn", alone can lead persons to commit sexual assaults on children. The area will possibly be subject to studies henceforth, as during above-mentioned conference, studies were presented regarding use/misuse of (non-fictional) picture and film material of sexual assaults on children. An area of increasing scientific interest to study further.

>>91559 (cont.)

I the following, a number of the newest studies will be briefly referenced.

Kingston et al. (2008) studied people convicted for sexual crimes where there had occurred an actual physical contact between violator and victim (hands-on) (TL: author's parenthesis and cursive, really regretting the format of TL notes now) and found that the use of pictures of sexual assaults on children for this group was a relevant risk factor, in that the sex offenders who had used the illegal pornographic materials had greater risk of falling back to similar criminality than those who hadn't.

Seto and Eke (2005) stated, based on a study of 201 users of pictures of sexual assaults on children, that the probability of users of pictures of sexual assaults on children later will commit hands-on assault is unknown. In their studies, they found that individuals with former convictions had a significantly greater probability of committing assault and crime again. users of pictures of sexual assaults on children, who prior to current conviction had committed sexual assault, were the individuals who with the the highest probability would commit crime again - either generally or sexually.

Endrass et al. (2009) had in a Swizz study attempted to estimate whether users of pictures of sexual assaults on children on the internet presents a greater risk of committing hands-on assault on children. It regarded 231 men convicted for possession of sexual assaults on children. The study showed at 11 (5%) of the men had a prior conviction for sexual and/or violent assault, 2 (1%) had a conviction for hands-on sexual including sexual abuse of a child, 8 (3%) had a conviction for a sexual violation where there had been no physical sexual contact between violator and victim (hands-off), and one had a conviction for a non-sexual violent assault. Assessment of recidive (TL: noun, medicine. A recurrence of a disease, symptom, or condition; a relapse.) for the group showed that 7 (3%) of the examined recidivated with a violent and/or sexual violation, 9 (4%) recidivated with a hands-off violation and 2 (1%) with a hands-on sexual assault.

Endrass et al. concluded on the basis of this material, that the use of pictures of sexual assaults on children alone was not a risk factor to commit hands-on sexual assault - at least not for the individuals who never before had been convicted for hands-on sexual assault. The majority of the examined had no prior convictions for hands-on violations or assaults. The researchers estimated that the prognosis for this group, for not committing hand-on sexual violations and assault, as well as recidive to child pornography, was good.

At the conference in Oslo, Endrass et al. presented follow-up on above-mentioned study. Another study was made of the group of 231 men convicted for possession of pictures of sexual assault on children, and found that after six years none had been convicted of hands-on assault. The majority of these didn't have any prior criminal history anyway, neither sexual or otherwise.

>>91564 (cont.)

The empirical literature on the subject of non-fictional pictures of sexual assault on children has not presented clear evidence that use of this material can lead to substantial risk of inflicting hands-on sexual assault. Some studies (e.g. Endrass 2009, Benz 2010) submits the assumption that users of pictures of sexual assault on children represents a special group. They submit that although some of these also commit hands-on sexual assault, the majority probably doesn't. As submitted in multiple studies, there can be an actual risk of former hands-on convicts committing similar criminality again, if they use non-fictional pictures of sexual assaults on children. The use or misuse of pictures of sexual assault on children alone, does not seem to be a predictor for hands-on sexual assaults on children.

As mentioned, the research into this area has only just increased in scope within recent years. Further and more comprehensive studies must and will be made for the purpose of prevention. To date, research seems to be showing that there exists a risk group (TL: pretty direct translation, but it might not mean exactly the same thing in English, where, as I understand it, you can also be in a group with low risk) for whom the use of non-fictional pictures of sexual assaults on children can contribute to assault. The referenced sources seem to doubt that the use of child pornographic picture material alone can lead to sexual contact-assaults.

Documentation supporting that "possession or similar of fictional child porn, that is not a realistic depiction, that appears in the same way or somewhat the same way as photographs or similar, can lead persons to commit sexual assaults on children", does not seem to exist at the current time.

With polite regards

Jørgen Bech-Jessen

clinical psychologist

external lector

Ellids Kristensen

Chief Physician, clinical lector

coordinator for the visitation- and treatment network

Thorkil Sørensen

Professor, dr. med. (TL: I wrote this guy's title as dk. last time, somebody shoot me)

These people are madmen. Don't ever again make me write the words "users of pictures of sexual assault on children".

I have attempted the closest and most faithful translation possible. That is, I kept myself from trying to improve on the sentence structure and general ease of understanding.

Anyway, how many of you read All That Shit, by the Mental health services in the Capital Region of Denmark? And what do you think of it?

>>91591

Good work has been done today, thanks danish anon.

>>91771

Aren't we the 9chan anime board? Anime is jsut the 8chan cacner board with a bit of anime.

When i read the translation i felt to me that the reporters were sami angry/dissapointed to not find any sort of connection and tried to bend the words just a little bit to their own narrative .

>>91802

That's pretty much a requirement nowadays. Every single article is only worth reading for the "results" part, all the rest is just damage control to appease the investor/SJWs and/or to not get banned from scientific community altogether. There's an article that states that there's a strong correlation between brain volume and IQ, but then they're like "w-well, it's not like this proves that brain size is a perfect measure of human intelligence or anything, please don't send threats to us, black lives matter".

>>91894

*if he was

>>91894

>Simulated rape porn isn't illegal

it is in some states

>>92699

Yes, that's one of the repeating statements in the papers. You basically have the people who stick to porn, and the ones that molest kids and occasionally watch porn.

I particularly like the part about rates of sexual assault falling around the same time porn was legalized.

>>92699

biden was by far our creepiest vice president and dems want to run him for pres in 2020 wew lad

>>92758

>rates of sexual assault falling around the same time porn was legalized

average IQ also increased

average testosterone also decreased

average nutrition per calorie decreased

average violent crime rate decreased

>>92699

>took CP possession conviction stats and looked at how many of them actually diddled kids

Woah there goy, you're not supposed to be thinking that hard. As if anyone would be allowed to do a study like that anyway or risk ruining their career for being a "pedo"

>>92699

>Now I'm wondering what the numbers would look like if you did a much larger study and took CP possession conviction stats and looked at how many of them actually diddled kids

Yeah, that's a question someone who wants to get arrested for CP posession and distribution would like to ask.