No.84694
I have nothing against lolis but can I get some ecchi anime recommendations where there are absolutely no loli(s)?
No.84697
>>84694
What do you mean by Loli? Do you mean flat chested women, or actual prepubescent children in sexual contexts? If you mean the latter that's easy, if the former, oof buddy, that's a tall favor to ask. The best I could master is Seikon no Quaser, but even that one has chestlets giving fan service. To be fair I'm the type of guy who only watches serious anime, or blatant train wrecks like Code Geass, Vulva Rape the Liberator, Guilty Crown etc. etc.
Anyhow at least you have this bump!
No.84702
>>84697
>What do you mean by Loli?
Under 18yo = loli
Over 18yo = cake
Over 19yo = ara
No.84709
>>84694
Yeah, boku no pico.
No.84715
No.84789
>>84702
>under 18yo = loli
No.84797
>>84796
Sumi and Ink are exactly 18 years old according to the story, so it's exactly what OP is looking for.
No.84800
>>84796
I miss when things like this had any chance of airing.
No.84808
No.84809
>>84694
>asking for loliless ecchi
>in an industry that doesn't have loli ecchi
Le trollfais
No.84856
>>84702
>under 18 yo = loli
Well you're retarded and out of luck OP.
No.84932
>2019
>loli
>ecchi
Lol where?
No.84994
So there is no loliless ecchi? Got it.
By loli I mean underage.
No.84997
No.85011
>>84994
>By loli I mean underage.
Underage where, you fucking retard?
14-16 is AoC in most non-insane countries, so that's not underage anymore, and all girls who get heavy ecchi are at least that old.
So no, you don't mean that by loli, you CAN'T mean that.
No.85012
>>84994
99.99% of all anime characters are underage. They're all school girls of one sort or another.
No.85036
If you are willing to broaden your horizons to mangoes then there are a lot of those, with a significant number among them surprisingly being joseishit. I don't know since when, anon, but nowadays I am really, really tired of lolishit, maybe I just got too old and their antics now irritate me instead of causing a boner.
No.85040
>>85036
>but nowadays I am really, really tired of lolishit
>nowadays
>lolishit
It doesn't even exist you humongous faggot holy fuck.
No.85043
>>85040
>loli fanservice has never existed before
>loli fanservice doesn't exist now
Are you fucking braindead? And I did specifically mention I was talking about mangoes. And even if you want to cherry pick and say you were referring to only anime, then what would you call shit like Ryokubu and Strike Witches? Are you going to say those doesn't count because they were adaptations of other media, or those girls aren't lolis because they're too old? Fuck off.
No.85050
>>85043
>Ryokubu
>Strike Witches
>nowadays
You fucking braindead retard, you know those are already close to being a decade old, and nothing like that can air these days?
Fuck back to your HOT GMILF porn sites, retard.
No.85228
>>85011
There are anime where underage(>14) girls get light ecchi/nude scenes. That is a no-no in many countries.
e.g. OniAi - A perfectly good anime get crammed with a loli. I can cite many more like haganai. Fuck Japanese Anime.
No.85249
>>85011
>Underage where, you fucking retard?
Please. As it is, Under 18=Loli.
But it should be under 25.
No.85252
I don't get it, is this thread some kind of 4D chess to troll the board's LRD clone or is this genuine raw stupidity?
No.85283
>>85249
Do you have brain damage?
No.85380
>>84694
You will have a harder time finding any with loli nowadays. Even adaptations of ecchi loli manga get the loli fanservice cut.
No.85381
No.85386
No.85389
More like loliless anime, amirite?
No.85411
>>85381
Because that became the new standard.
Nobody risks doing loli ecchi now and being branded a pedo.
No.85422
>>85050
Once again, I was talking about mangoes and never even changed the context of my argument ever since the first post you replied to. I even tried to entertain your train of thought but it's obvious you're just a frustrated moecuck who is butthurt that lolis are now something that can only be found in manga, a medium which has always been superior to your shitty mobing pigtures. It's not my fault you can't get a boner without listening to high pitched screeching VAs, projecting moecuck. Cut your own dick off LRD faggot.
No.85430
>>85422
Nice damage control there, you mention decade old titles for "entertaining my train of thought", then you get BTFO, and start talking about something else again.
All you can do of course is going ad-hominem, as you can't hold an argument over something of a solid fact.
Just go back to your "superior mangar community".
No.85447
No.85448
>>85411
Naw there's still loli in manga, light/visual novels.
No.85449
>>85448
Because they don't get to the masses, so for the time - until they get more media coverage - they are safe.
But I was talking about anime, where now someone doing loli ecchi would stick out like a sore thumb, and the director would be branded "that creepy pedo".
No.85512
>>85422
I would have preferred another LRD post over whatever this is.
No.92050
>>85447
God i hope things go back to normal when that shit is over and never comes back to japan, I don't have high hopes tho moral fags never let go of the power they manage to get.
No.92054
>>92051
No because that's >>>/co/ shit. This is an anime board.