No.80450[Last 50 Posts]
padded friends are the bestest friends!
post pics and vids of at least 3 or more people wearing diapers. both boys and girls are allowed, there's no hate here.
bonus points if they're visibly wet/messy, or in public. all the points if they're both.
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.80451
some to start the thread off
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.80452
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.80453
oh almost forgot, no halloween costume / sorority girl bullshit allowed. ABDL only here.
←- example
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.80454
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.80455
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.80456
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.80458
Cute idea, but too many females. Can we get some boys up in here?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.80460
Not enough women, post grills please
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.80465
Too many Fat Chicks. Post more Fit Girls.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.80474
>>80458
>>80460
>>80465
Post what you’ve got retards
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.80754
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84142
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84159
>>84142
I feel genuinely sorry for the child in the first image.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84167
I love that half of these are ones I've seen on FetLife before (including OPs), and anyone who thinks posting a picture on that site is safe because you can't explicitly cut and paste to save photos is a fucking dunce.
Thanks for the fap fodder all.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84169
>>84159
I posted the pic because I really, really hoped that my post would trigger some idiot and I'm not dissapointed. Do you realize that your average, narcissistic, normie parent that you think is good is actually much more dangerous for child's development than let's say.. parent-fetishist? Because there is a slight chance that parent who has , let's say this diaper fetish, will at least be slightly more open-minded and free thinking in some ways than average parent. In other words, there is a chance that such a parent would reject at least some of the stupid social norms set by this society, which is, at least for me, a good thing. Existence of people like you is the main reason why wearing diapers is not accepted and people have to hide this fetish from others. And yea, the kid will probably develop a diaper fetish like his parents. So what? You also wear diapers, idiot. (If not why you are even here in the first place)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84171
>>84169
>Existence of people like you is the main reason why wearing diapers is not accepted and people have to hide this fetish from others.
Hmm I wonder why a fetish where you act like a baby and a toddler and shit and piss in diapers is not socially accepted… It never will be either
>parent-fetishist
>good for children
Lol
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84173
>>84171
>Hmm I wonder why a fetish where you act like a baby and a toddler
Not me. I'm not AB. Rest of your post is cut out of context.
Also, people who are really intelligent are not going to breed and have kids at all.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84176
>>84173
>Also, people who are really intelligent are not going to breed and have kids at all.
>intelligent
I think the word you meant there was "selfish"
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84179
>>84176
No, he's right. There's a significant negative correlation between IQ and reproduction rate.
I think it might be caused by something similar to the Dunning-Kruger effect. Idiots overestimate their own ability as parents and underestimate the challenges involved in raising a happy child. Intelligent people are more aware of all the complexities and potential problems, so they tend to have less confidence in their own abilities as parents.
Also, educated people tend to be more aware of (and care about) the resource constraints our species is facing, while less educated people tend to be more swayed by religious or short-term economic arguments.
Personally I think adoption is a good middle ground. You aren't bringing new life into the world, but you still get to do your part to improve the life of a child.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84180
>>84173
>people who are really intelligent are not going to breed and have kids at all.
tfw too smart to reproduce
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84182
>>84181
Are you the same retard derailing every thread with your autism? Fuck off and post diapers, faggot.
>XD
Back to reddit
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84188
>>80454
>SOAPLA
I thought they had a rule against photos of their events?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84189
>>84179
>There's a significant negative correlation between IQ and reproduction rate.
Only because there's also a significant negative correlation between birth control and the reproduction rate -AND- birthda contronl availability and IQ of the average populace.
Earlier studies, before birth control, found a slight positive correlation between fertility and intelligence. See Osborn, F; Bajema, CJ (1972). "The eugenic hypothesis". Social Biology. 19 (4): 337–45.
>I think it might be caused by something similar to the Dunning-Kruger effect.
I think you've demonstrated it well in your post.
>Also, educated people tend to be more aware of (and care about) the resource constraints our species is facing, while less educated people tend to be more swayed by religious or short-term economic arguments.
If by educated, you mean indoctrinated, yes. There are no real constraints on human's reproduction but our own erroneous fear-filled projections of the future. Julian Simons explained the faults of Malthusian economics in his book "The Ultimate Resource"
Notice how food / housing / everything is available for less hours of work than anytime before in history - that's the result of the human population increasing. Whenever times gets worse, it's the result of a human population drop. As long as the population goes up, we invent faster, make way more food than we need, etc.
Depopulation is a much scarier problem. Look at Japan. The world population is expected to cap in 2060-2080. This will usher in a world-wide never-ending recession (at least until the population bottoms out, if ever) and it will have been caused by birth control because, it turns out, humans are generally selfish and only had kids because they couldn't handle abstinence.
Hence my point that "selfish" fits better there than "intelligence."
Please recognize that you've spouted "common knowledge" (i.e. what the media told you) and I've referenced scholarly sources to support my opinion. Please prepare citations if you want to go further.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84210
>>80754
Oh huh, that's me on the far left, I'm glad someone saved it after the tumblrpocalypse
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84218
>>84188
That photo was taken years ago, at a house party. It's not one of the newer events they do.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84223
>>84189
>Earlier studies, before birth control, found a slight positive correlation between fertility and intelligence.
No. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.ssresearch.2014.06.003
>There are no real constraints on human's reproduction but our own erroneous fear-filled projections of the future.
There very obviously are. In fact, the further out you look the more fundamental the limitations become. There are already widespread shortages of essential resources such as food, clean water, and energy. We are failing to adequately provide for the current human population, and while we are capable of solving that problem using existing technology, there's no political will to do so.
Honestly, I've been studying the subject for a while and I've come to realize that the strongest arguments against unbounded population growth are economic rather than physical. There are physical limits (the most fundamental is a t^3 upper bound on population) but those are large compared to the economic limits. If our technology keeps improving exponentially (and if it doesn't we're really fucked) then very soon we're going to be faced with almost complete unemployment due to automation. At that point there will be no economic incentive to build the infrastructure required to support an ever-growing population. The people with the ability to solve the problem will almost certainly favor preserving natural ecosystems over supporting billions of obsolete peasants.
>Depopulation is a much scarier problem. Look at Japan. The world population is expected to cap in 2060-2080. This will usher in a world-wide never-ending recession
That's because the entire neo-liberal economic system is basically a ponzi scheme. ("Planet Ponzi" is a good book on the subject) You get recessions because debt is growing faster than assets, and no amount of baby-making will solve that. If you push your children deeper into debt to pay off your own debts, then your grandchildren will have to be even more indebted to pay off your childrens' debts and so on. The only people who profit from such a system are the bankers.
>Please recognize that you've spouted "common knowledge" (i.e. what the media told you) and I've referenced scholarly sources to support my opinion. Please prepare citations if you want to go further.
Look, if you want to make an appeal to experts, then there are literally thousands of peer-reviewed articles explaining precisely how fucked we are if we don't drastically change our course.
Hell, there are entire journals dedicated to the topic: https://www.nature.com/nclimate/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84255
>>84223
Thought. Since there is greater access to the internet for the poor in recent times via phones, is there going to be less population growth as a whole on the planet as more women become more controlling of their bodies and not just become baby makers.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84262
>>84210
I found the video on diaperpin.me, long time ago, and decided to post it here. Do you want me to delete it? Do you have.. longer version by any chance?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84264
>she's still mad people are posting this photo
kino
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84269
>>80452
Ah, TareBear, the person who used to put people's pictures up from FetLife that she didn't like wholesale on (New)Fapchan. I get a hate smile whenever she gets poster here.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84270
>>84262
Nah I'm happy to see it's still around! I'll ask my friend if he's still got the full thing
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84272
>>84270
Allright. I must say, I'm very suprised I found someone in that video here on 8chan. I thought stuff like that just does not happen And yes, ask please. I would love to see longer version.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84304
>>84264
Where is this from. I've seen another photo that has the girl in the middle and the girl to her left, but that's all I know. Is there a whole photoshoot/video that I don't know about?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84306
>>84269
She sounds like robin hoe. Sharing tits to the world.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84308
>>84306
Hey, live by the pirated tits, die by the pirated tits.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84348
>>84223
Earlier studies, before birth control, found a slight positive correlation between fertility and intelligence.
>No.https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.ssresearch.2014.06.003
Cites a study post-birth control study to counter the point that "before birth control". This doesn't counter my point. My study still
stands un-rebutted.
>Honestly, I've been studying the subject for a while and I've come to realize that the strongest arguments against unbounded population growth are economic rather than physical. There are physical limits (the most fundamental is a t^3 upper bound on population) but those are large compared to the economic limits. If our technology keeps improving exponentially (and if it doesn't we're really fucked) then very soon we're going to be faced with almost complete unemployment due to automation. At that point there will be no economic incentive to build the infrastructure required to support an ever-growing population. The people with the ability to solve the problem will almost certainly favor preserving natural ecosystems over supporting billions of obsolete peasants.
Technological innovation comes from unexpected sources. Sure, lots of unnecessary peasants - but some will turn out to be the next Einstein. Lower the pool, and you also reduce the outliers. Innovation will suffer and feeding the peasants isn't a problem anymore with our current tech level.
>That's because the entire neo-liberal economic system is basically a ponzi scheme. ("Planet Ponzi" is a good book on the subject) You get recessions because debt is growing faster than assets, and no amount of baby-making will solve that. If you push your children deeper into debt to pay off your own debts, then your grandchildren will have to be even more indebted to pay off your childrens' debts and so on. The only people who profit from such a system are the bankers.
Obviously this is false. Look at the price of goods compared to labor required now, and at each prior point in history. This system is clearly benefiting everyone - though I admit is disproportionately benefits the 1%, that's a very different thing than saying the systems -only- benefits the 1%. Also, the source I cited: "The Ultimate Resource" by Julian Simmons explains why you're wrong but I know you didn't read it.
>Look, if you want to make an appeal to experts, then there are literally thousands of peer-reviewed articles explaining precisely how fucked we are if we don't drastically change our course.
If you'd actually read the things I cited and apply rationality, you'd realize I'm correct. I only post citations because everything you posted so far is generally based on you "gut" and that means nothing. I agree there's peer-reviewed doom-and-gloom economic articles. The Ultimate Resource succinctly counters them, and explains the false premises upon which all such articles are built.
To believe things are going to get worse as population increases is to ignore all evidence over the entire course of history showing that things -always- get better in the long term (50-100 years) with population increases. Higher population equals greater availability of goods and services. Look around - how do you think people lived in 1800? in 1600? in 400?
The collapse of the Bronze Age was accompanied by a sharp decline in worldwide population. The Iron Age didn't start until world population came back up.
But, whatever, ignore all experience we've ever had with population being correlated to success and just assume that, somehow, all the evidence is wrong and some "experts" projection is right - though they've never been right before, even when they were predicting horse manure would be the end of the world in the 1800s (then, of course, the car was invented).
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84352
>>84169
Shut the fuck up, pedophile.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84357
>>84352
.t
Guy who vents his anger on random people on imageboards.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84360
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84372
>>84264
Oof, that soaked chick in the middle.
It's a lot hotter when they actually use them and don't just throw them on for quirky photos.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84378
>>84264
I made that picture 100% better
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84392
>>84378
Reeeeee fat chicks and a black chick reeeeeeeee!!!!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84393
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84394
>>84392
Pretty sure she's asian
But you can't really see her diaper so meh.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84403
>>84272
Yeah, looks like that video is all there is? But I did find some other photos from that night
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84408
>>80450
What would an /abdl/ meetup look like?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84474
>>84372
It's PoutinePrincess
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84475
>>84408
There're a lot of qts in the gay thread, better than we'd expect, I think
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84510
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84564
>>84403
bls describe what happened that night. You look like the cyootest one there with your animal prints
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84607
>>84264
Trans asian guy, decent chick, trans white guy, fat chick, fat chick. Everyone hates the trans but cant spot em I guess… Thats why Hrt be scary, go for a change and find a dick.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84610
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84611
>>84607
lol middle chick isnt trans you knob
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84625
>>84510
>>84392
>>84394
>>84378
It's an asian man
>>84264
The girl with the leg tattoos actually wouldn't be bad looking if she slimmed down a bit
>>84611
Is that actually confirmed? She has a weird face but her actual body anatomy looks fairly female
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84669
>>84625
Isnt the mid Riley Kilo, rileykilo.com, most definitely a man by birth.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84670
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84677
>>84670
The middle one is definitely no the same face as on the front of that tumblr
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84700
>>84677
It is PoutinePrincess, you lobotomized gnome. There are more pics from that set with her.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84721
>>84700
Dont get mad at me just cause you in denial about wanting the boy-pussy
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84722
It is definitely poutine princess. The tumblr pic is using a filter. Whether or not it is actually a girl I can’t say for sure, but “her” real name leads me to believe it’s a girl.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84737
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84746
>>84737
I mean, maybe its just the angle but the mid-person looks like they've got a hell of a strong jawline and i dont see that jaw in the tumblr pics… But again, maybe its the angle…
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84747
>>84721
She's female but really weird looking
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84753
I need MORE. Seeing groups of diapers is giving me extreme boner.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84765
>>84747
You think she's making Poutine in that last picture? I could go for some.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84780
>>84721
>projecting this hard
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84781
>>84747
Its just her chin really thats weird.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84784
>>84348
>Technological innovation comes from unexpected sources. Sure, lots of unnecessary peasants - but some will turn out to be the next Einstein. Lower the pool, and you also reduce the outliers. Innovation will suffer and feeding the peasants isn't a problem anymore with our current tech level.
You really don't understand how this works. There will come a point in the not too distant future when the best machine minds are superior to even the Einstein-level human geniuses. In the long run it will always end up being more efficient to build and operate AIs than to play the genetic lottery with a population of resource-hungry humans.
As for the rest of your post, the peer reviewed scientific articles are all available via sci-hub. Citing books written by economists is all well and good, but personally I'd trust the physicists to have more accurate forecasting models - especially when the economic arguments seem to just be crude extrapolation from historical trends. You can fit an exponential curve to a lot of things, but at some point the laws of thermodynamics get in the way. You can argue about the precise point at which the exponential growth will flatten out, but it undoubtedly will. As I said, even the most optimistic model for the spread of perfectly efficient von-Neumann machines in an infinite universe gives a polynomial upper bound (t^3 for the number of machines, t^2 for their computation rate).
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84798
>>84784
Lol that was the least meaningful techno-babble rebuttals Ive ever read. I think you mean well, but here's the thing:
I understand graduate level economics, and have taken graduate level courses (though my graduate degree is in something else)
My understanding of physics is college level but i admit its not my balliwick.
Economics is the study of the creation and exchange of value
Physics is the study of matter and energy.
Clearly the former is the branch of science directed at answering the questions we are arguing about. Im not sure you really know what those terms you are throwing around mean - but i am sure they are inapplicable to our discussion.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84811
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84869
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.84904
>>84475
>>84408
we should pick a central place and just do it.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.85152
>>84189
You cited one source on the correlation between intelligence and fertility. From 1972.
The rest was full of assumptions and conjecture with no supporting evidence.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.85580
all of you are fucking retards. at least post pics if you're gonna be screeching autistically
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.85588
>>85580
i miss amy. she was decent looking and not fat.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.85768
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.85769
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.85770
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.85771
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.85772
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.85773
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.85969
>>85580
dandylionwishes is so fucking cute
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.85988
>>84798
>Clearly the former is the branch of science
Economics is not a science. In science disagreements are settled via experiments. In economics, disagreements are perpetuated by endless debates and essays with little relation to reality. Pick any hypothesis or economic policy, no matter how blatantly flawed, and you'll be able to find a prominent economist who has written a book advocating for it.
Seriously, the foundational assumption of most economic models is that humans are both rational and well-informed. It's a complete joke.
Anyway, even if economics followed the scientific method, it would still be the wrong field to answer questions regarding energy availability (physics), mineral resources (geology) and ecosystem stability (biology).
We already know the answer to the economic question, "are governments and corporations willing to provide for over 7 billion humans?" The answer is a resounding no. Even in 1st world countries with ample spare resources people are still dying from exposure and malnutrition. The economy has already assigned a value to human life, and it's very, very low.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.86328
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.86746
>>85580
Girl on the right in the second pic is hot. Is there more of her?
>>86328
Girl in the middle in the third pic is also hot. I'd be grateful if you could give me some more pics of her too.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87190
>>85969
what happened to her? I have her snapchat that she sold but she doesn't post on there anymore
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87692
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88129
Most of these people are either niggers or fatties, gross!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88137
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88142
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88143
>>87692
sauce for the first pic?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88151
>>87692
Anyone know where I can acquire that bunny onesie?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88239
>>88137
>the same image posted eternally by the local commie
after you
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88542
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88623
>>88129
Why are you complaining? At least it's something. Not like content is constantly pumped out, for free. Also, still using that word to describe black folks huh?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88662
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89922
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.