/abdl/ - Adult Baby - Diaper Lover★

Look at your community's masturbation laws to find out what kind of masturbation is legal and what's illegal you fucking retard

Hey look an autistic thread. Kys faggot

Stop being spooked and do whatever you want

>>68033 (OP)

I think it's probably illegal to download videos like that for the purpose of masturbating.

Good luck trying to justify it to a jury.

>>68042

Good luck proving it was downloaded for the fappening… I feel like it would be a copyright case rather than a masturbatory one.

And if we really want to take legality here, what about the fucking people who upload videos of their kids taking bath on youtube in the first place? They're the one providing what should constitute as child porn and be locked up for it.

I'd advice to get a good therapist to everyone involved in this autistic scenario regardless.

>>68050

>I'd advice to get a good therapist to everyone involved in this autistic scenario regardless.

I mean… how is it any more fucked than having a diaper fetish to begin with?

>>68082

Consent for one thing

>>68050

>Good luck proving it was downloaded for the fappening…

They usually do that based on where it's saved. If you have it in a folder along side all your other fap material then it's pretty obvious what you were doing. If you want to be safe, keep it in a folder full of cute cat videos or something.

>>68050

>parents who film their children in the bath should be imprisoned

I'm sure that will make the world a better place and not just fuel your primitive desire to see people suffer… /s

>>68082

Mainly >>68088

Besides "diaper fetish" in itself only means attracted to diapers. Not ageplay. Personally I have a broader clothing fetish, though diapers comes in first.

Or maybe you're saying "how is it more fucked up than having ANY fetish",

>>68093

>I'm sure that will make the world a better place and not just fuel your primitive desire to see people suffer… /s

I hardly feel involved since I don't upload videos of naked kids on youtube, nor watch videos featuring naked kids on youtube, nor would I download them. Just saying that in that scenario the providers of child porn would be locked up too.

But, sorry to disappoint, I don't really care about what baffling morons feel, wether it be happiness or pain… I'm doing just fine not thinking about the retarded parents uploading their kids' bathroom session for the whole world to see. It's truly their problem.

its hard for me to watch mommying videos like that -- i get so jealous :(

>>68042

Suicide isn’t an option, it’s the answer you autistic incel

To be honest, there are some really cute videos that parents upload where a kid just casually drops a massive load in their pants like it was nothing. Im kind of in the same boat as OP some of the time. Its not the kids that Im attracted to.* Its what they are doing, its the fact that they are just minding their own business, and then stand there and destroy their diaper, then just go on playing or whatever like its totally normal. Honestly I prefer to see that in adults, but there is simply a limited amount of this kind of stuff. There was one video where this little girl was "singing" beauty and the beast, (its more like shrieking to be honest) and then just unleashes anal hell into her pants. The dad was sitting there and you hear him mouth "Oh my God…" to himself. She is standing there spewing what sounds like very wet shit into her pants for a good 30 seconds, then resumes singing.

The thing about these is it could be seen by anyone as an innocent, funny video.

* I actually know that I am not attracted to the kids themselves. For a while I thought I was, and looked into stuff that can be found on TOR sites. It didnt take long to realize that I want nothing to do with kids sexually. It was after this that I realized that it really is just what they are doing, not the kid, that I am attracted to.

>>68033 (OP)

>Can't believe I'm typing this, but - what's the legality of masturbating to innocuous YouTube videos of mothers dealing with their babies? I'm talking about diaper change and morning routine vlog type of videos.

Isn't this exactly what Yior was doing back in the day?

>>68189

Didn't Yior have some people specifically creating underage content for the site

>>68195

>>68189

who or what is yior? a website or a person? how did it end?

>>68205

Well then

>>68105

>or maybe you're saying "how is it more fucked up than having ANY fetish"

Yeah. I mean they're all kind of random aren't there? You just get one like that. I'm on a fucking adult diaper online board, my god, why would I ever wish this upon me? It's kind of sad in a way because it's so "innocent", it's not any more stupid than a nose fetish, or some super specific one. But it's just silly as shit still. I have a fucking diaper fetish, Jesus.

>>68088

That's a pretty good argument. It's still kind of fucked, I mean pornography in general. I feel bad. "Yes", the people involved consented and are selling the videos, but I bet none of them would do it if they had a better way to pay the bills. So it's consent but only because the other road is likely a road to homelessness. Is that still proper consent? I mean, is it that much more of a consent than "violating" the rights of a mother by masturbating to some vlog routine? Not trying to justify anything, just rambling a bit. It also makes me think about what kind of "uses" you grant morally by uploading a video of you bathing your 3 yo kid on YouTube. For example, what if you "use" the video just to humiliate the mother, somehow? To laugh at how she handles things or something. Maybe edit it humorously, repost it like that. She wouldn't want that either. So what separates that from masturbating to it?

>>68144

I feel you man.

>>68234

Whatever moral uses are available, they aren't in public view and it wouldn't be enforceable in court as a use. The closest thing it could be construed to is context. I know you didn't intend for that to come to real world abstractions, but if it's not pubic it's something civil.

>>68189

Yior not only had parents he paid for pictures of kids far too old to be in diapers. He also cruised the very few tbdl places and actively tried to groom teens.

>>68249

gross… I feel like kids in diapers is fine, as long as it is going to be happening anyway. Like, if a kid wears diapers for bedwetting, thats fine, but a kid who would normally have no business or desire to wear a diaper shouldn't be pressured into it. Furthermore, I would go so far as to say it shouldn't even be brought up. Like, even if they agree to wear them, the fact that someone suggested it is still altering the situation in and of itself.

>>68265

The problem was parents selling photos of their children to a pervert. Diapers don't harm anyone.