/abdl/ - Adult Baby - Diaper Lover★

what a bizarrely specific fetish

>>62994 (OP)

I've seen this before and I quite like it. Logically I know it's almost certainly just one guy samefagging to post his fantasies, but that tiny sliver of doubt makes it much more exciting.

Personally I have no sympathy for the family blogs and parenting forums - those sites tend to be filled with the worst sort of people anyway. Reading their opinions on internet censorship should be enough to dispel any residual sympathy you have for them.

There are a few other similar discussions I've seen between perverts "parents". Take this one for instance:

https://www.misterpoll.com/forums/292749/topics/277191

I'm not ashamed to say I've fapped to some of those posts more than once. They're obviously fake, but again the way they're presented makes them much more arousing than the same ideas told in a traditional story.

One of the more interesting examples is this:

https://www.misterpoll.com/users/331061

It's either real (which seems unlikely) or one of the most dedicated, long-running, and consistently in-character roleplay accounts I've ever seen.

I always assumed this was started by the same person who spread the thing about brides wearing diapers on their wedding day so they wouldn’t have to go through the trouble of taking off their dress

>>63004

Pretty sure the young turks of all people covered this a few years back. I remember seeing their video before I knew anything about who they were.

Holy shit dude stop with the spoiler tags this isn't /tv/ you fucking autist

>>63010

No.

and fuck you

>>63005

this video 👌

>>63013

I would love to see Ana Kasparian wearing diapers and regressed to baby 🤔

>>63011

>It's a messed up thing because you are basically forcing people into interacting with your weird fetish against their will.

I find this reasoning really strange. In essence it is judging people's actions, not on the consequences of those actions, but rather on the private mental state of the person doing them. Two people can do exactly the same thing in exactly the same situation with exactly the same outcome, but one is somehow worse than the other because of their particular fetishes. It also tries to make a false equivalence between very explicit sexual acts and extremely mild weirdness - in fact you make the same analogy yourself. Following this reasoning to its logical conclusion, we could say that a guy exposing his junk in the middle of a theme park is the same as a guy sharing pictures of tile patterns on a builders forum.

In my opinion this is no worse than trolling those blogs/forums with any other fictional stories of parental insanity.

>depending on the definition of "the worst sort of people" even you might be considered one of them.

Yes, everything is technically subjective. There are an infinitude of possible self-consistent ethical systems in which Hitler was a saint, and there are an infinitude of possible self-consistent ethical systems in which I am evil. I'm sure lots of people would consider me evil. I personally disagree, but neither of us is objectively more correct than the other. The only truly objective stance is nihilism.

>>63015 (me)

Actually, I think this just boils down to the difference between virtue ethics and consequentialist ethics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtue_ethics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consequentialism

>>63012

I mean dude you can reply in that manner in a mocking way to "troll" me all you want the only thing you do is embarrass yourself and prove my point so kindly keep doing it you autist fuck. Just know that this post and every post you make here is going to be laughed at for reading like a highschool drama.

>>63018

says the dumbass who keeps namefagging after namefagging was declared illegal immoral unethical and faggotlike on this board

no one wants to send you email "sage", nor wants to know you're even here

>>63015

>The only truly objective stance is nihilism.

> I'm sure lots of people would consider me evil

wors, u smart

>>63021

I think we just disagree on how much harm is caused by "creeping people out". It doesn't even come close to the harm caused by laughing at a dead kid on their parents' facebook page, as you try to imply. Why do you keep coming up with the most absurd and extreme comparisons?

Honestly, anyone who can't handle occasionally coming across opinions/discussions/images slightly outside their comfort zone shouldn't be on the internet in the first place. If it's posted on their own blog they can even delete the offending comments, although that level of technical aptitude might be beyond their abilities. This is even worse than the usual cries of, "why won't someone think of the children," because we're talking about adults.

That's pretty fucked up. But there are too many people in this fetish on the internet who are completely fucking retarded peices of shit.

Like the guys who constantly post on family forums or youtube comments, pretending to have a child who needs bedwetting diapers or similar. They will construct a believable, long-winded story about how the child needs diapers and support and shit, which are usually fairly unoffensive, and then they'll pretend the child starts rebelling against the diapers and drop the retarded fucking "if you're going to act like a baby we'll treat you as one" line. Which makes their true perverse intentions and utter retardation truly obvious.

Why would they use cloth diaper and rubber pants in 2018 when there are plenty of pull-ups-like disposables available? If we're talking convenience, it just trumps the old-school diapers. They're not even thinking before making fakes…

With all the scandals going on over the decades there probably is some truth to it but not as widespread as some make it out to be. At most it would probably be the size of any other catholic sect. The way I think it happened is some priest got the idea to put girls in diapers to “symbolize” their purity and as part of the cover up the church let it continue allowing it to gradually spread.

>>63003

>Personally I have no sympathy for the family blogs and parenting forums - those sites tend to be filled with the worst sort of people anyway. Reading their opinions on internet censorship should be enough to dispel any residual sympathy you have for them.

Personally I have more sympathy for family blogs than those who hold veneration of their right to creep on them to be the measuring stick of good and evil. You're pathetic.

>>63011

This generation is 'consent' crazy. The people responding to these outlandish posts said 'wow, that's really odd' and moved on with their day.

>>63042

It's just the most recent way to dress up the same old feelings of social authoritarianism. Society goes through these long cycles of social authoritarianism and libertarianism. As much as people on both sides like to think we're in a uniquely progressive period, there have been highs and lows going back thousands of years. The only relatively new thing is the speed at which people and culture can travel around the world.

>The people responding to these outlandish posts said 'wow, that's really odd' and moved on with their day.

It's always easier to propose insane bullshit when you can claim to be speaking on behalf of some nebulous group of victims. It makes it a lot easier to get away with making absurd exaggerations without having to justify your stance. Governments do this shit all the time whenever they want to increase their own power.

>>63104

>It's just the most recent way to dress up the same old feelings of social authoritarianism. Society goes through these long cycles of social authoritarianism and libertarianism. As much as people on both sides like to think we're in a uniquely progressive period, there have been highs and lows going back thousands of years. The only relatively new thing is the speed at which people and culture can travel around the world.

Pretty much this video:

>>63110

>unironically posting one of this fag's videos

Hello, boomer

>>63136

I watched the video and it seemed reasonable. He's somewhat to the right of me politically, but he understands the problem better than most of the left seem to.

I know this might be a bit off topic, but as a guy that only went to church when I was little I kinda associate church with being little. I remember Sunday school class taught by teenage girl in the church that loved to hug me and make me sit on their laps. I also recall doing bedtime prayers (The whole "God bless mommy, and daddy, and grandma, ect." thing.).

As an atheist now the whole thing is kinda a turn on. If I was diapered and forced to sing church nursery rhymes I'd be pretty hot tbh.

>>63136

go back to cuckchan with your D&C memes, faggot

>>63147

>D&C memes

Back to /pol/, this is a fetish board not your political playground

>>63156

>>63147

You're both fucking retards shut the fuck up holy shit no one gives a flying fuck.

Reminded me to that decade old parenting website where people told their stories about going to amusement park being diapered by their parents.

>>63136

But I was born in 1991 :(

>>63140

If I'm not mistaken, he's somewhat of a libertarian -- probably the kind of people that would vote for Ron Paul 🤔

>>63144

> I was diapered and forced to sing church nursery rhymes I'd be pretty hot tbh.

to me it's this plus wearing cute little girl clothes -- nice fantasy 🤔

>>62994 (OP)

This concept needs to come ture & be written by law & made compulsory.

>>63344

Just imagen just imagen the beauty of going to 1 of these communions, the embarrassment of the girls & the cute crinkle their diapers make, heck it doesn't even have to be Cloth Diapers, they can be Disposable Plastic Backed Diapers as well & imagen the total joy in seeing some of them accidentally use then during the communion, the sound the embarrassment & tear made from the, is just to perfect.

>>63378

Imagine these cute little girls all dressed up in white: white diapers, white tights and a first white communion dress -- especially taking into consideration that the white color basically represents purity and cleanliness…

Now imagine them shitting on their diapers. At the same time, side by side, you have all that dirtiness, all the disgustiness and just utterly and total shit and mess on that people's butt.

But it's all contained and enclosed onto her diapers. The purity remains untouched and untainted. 🤔

>>63392

Yes and imagen the total and utter embarrassment, shame & fear these girls will feel, as all of them know that the whole gathering can see them ass they have pped & pooped themselves & imagen the crying they sure as hell will do beacuse they know that there are cameras everywhere taking pictures & record film of them as they are using their diapers & they know that all of the material is going to be posted on the web, they wil cry like babies.

>>63394

>>63395

I can only get so erect, anons

We'll grab anyone caught staring at the little girls and sit them on the electric chair

>>63397

Fuck off moralfag, back to /pol/

>>63395

Yes but we need it on mass, not just 1 or 2 girls in them using them, we need 25-50 of them using them on mass, crying together.

>>63396

Then go and the that erection a long hard wank, then come back when you are ready to be erect again.

>>63400

I will bury your face in all of these wet & dirty little girls diapers untill you suffocate to death, your ugly, unwashed, circumcised, hairless, moralfagging baby cunt.

Bump.

>>63439

2nd

>>63337

>>63378

>>63394

>>63401

>>63529

It was only a matter of time before the dude trolling all those forums with these stories found this thread… you're an embarrassment to us all, anon.

>>63042

>>63104

>>63110

>endlessly yammering on about my creepy fetish for little girls wearing diapers to own the libs

>>63535

LOL!

This is epic.

>>63004

It totally was, along with stories of diapered flower girls, kids diapered for going to Disneyland, diapering for the flu, etc.

The Goodnites forum used to be filled with this guy's handiwork which is probably why they don't have one anymore.

There was a really angry dude on Topix that had I believe been essentially stalking the author of these posts and had outed him or something, and every time he'd try posting again would respond with lots and lots of name calling and citations of previous stories.

But Topix deleted the forums those were on so…

Think we could spread the rumour that Twitch girls who don't go on cam or show off their asses wear diapers so they don't have to pee during streams?

>>64320

Nope but maybe it could be a meme for the LULS. but i don't think it would be a rumour.

>>64320

I just don't think that we have the manpower to accomplish that, also anyone who is aware of this fetish would probably put 2 and 2 together pretty quick and attribute it to us. I won't stop anyone from trying though, it'd be funny as hell if anyone actually bought it

>>64320

I reckon people would believe it.

>>64320

If you want to normalize the idea of wearing diapers for convenience you need to be less specific. If you only ever talk about twitch girls, people will realize you just have a weird fetish.

Build on the existing idea of オムツァ (diaperers) in Japan and spread different stories across lots of different social media sites. It would also help if you had a decent number of sockpuppet accounts to react in a positive but still believable way. Basically copy all the tactics used by marketing/propaganda companies.

>>64320

it'd be funny because if it actually happened, somewhere down the line, I just know fucking pewdiepie will have to make a PR move video because he'll somehow be involved with the drama

I love the fucking deep lore of this story. This is the strongest sense of community I've ever had in ABDL, that we're all separately familiar with this fucking bogus niche theme in niche fap fiction. Love you guys.

>>64371

>heavy metal Cambodian diapers band

You fucking what m8

A Little Bump.

>>64755

2nd.

More of these stories.

Can we get some more stories like these PLEASE!?

http://abdlstories.homestead.com/Diapered_For_My_First_Communion.html

>>71964

I still don't buy it. This is just another person going "I said it and now its true" as far as I can tell. I mean, I could almost see that being real, and thats why I dont think it is. Its too well thought out to be real. For the rest of the world, diapers are not something they think about unless they have close association with young kids. even with a valid symbolic reason (which this doesn't quite qualify as in my opinion) the only people who this would even occur to would be someone trying to perpetuate this as being a thing. Nice try, but still not proof.

>>71985

None of them are true, it is not a "thing" and never will be. This image for example…

>>71964

Those aren't even Communion dresses and girl in the diaper isn't even that old regardless (meaning she's probably not even out of diapers).

These aren't the only ones either, you can find TONS of fake ass bed wetting stories plastered all over incontinence pages, especially child/teen bed wetting boards.

Some of them are also pedos looking to groom kids. Pedos like targeting fetish communities looking for vulnerable kids/teens they can blackmail with said fetish. Sort of a, 'I'll be your daddy… if you let me molest you.' kind of deal. They can often forcibly keep the kid/teen quiet simply by threatening to expose them and their fetish to their family if the kid/teen doesn't give them what they want.

One of the most recent tactics is to track down a teen's dox (or in some cases just a pretty girl) and then outright threaten to "out" them to their friends/family if they don't submit to them and do what they want.

This ultimately fucks the entire community over because the more it happens the less inclined people are to post any content (at all) out of fear of being outed/blackmailed.

>>63167

I remember a forum from a few years ago that went down before I managed to save the thread from it, and it had a thread called something along the lines of "Sons and Enemas" and it was like this but with enemas, and talking about how their sons would get erections from it.

Entire forum website went down and I don't remember what it was called to find it on the Wayback Machine.