[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / baaa / caco / choroy / dempart / doomer / hypno / sw ][Options][ watchlist ]

/abdl/ - Adult Baby - Diaper Lover

All about ageplay!
You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.
Email
Comment *
File
Select/drop/paste files here
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

File (hide): 385ef8c9ec8db4c⋯.jpg (183.02 KB, 917x819, 131:117, Best of Forum #1 - 1981 - ….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): ac683f06fd3351f⋯.jpg (265.47 KB, 1492x717, 1492:717, Best of Forum Letters - Su….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): db9260e4acc0e81⋯.jpg (635.08 KB, 2331x1234, 2331:1234, Forum Magazine - April 197….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 9ee8e5724776085⋯.jpg (479.01 KB, 1670x1214, 835:607, Forum Magazine - April 197….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 145c94a85a8658f⋯.jpg (361.64 KB, 1501x1105, 1501:1105, Forum Magazine - December ….jpg) (h) (u)

[–]

5c7157 (28)  No.50916>>54810 >>74313 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

Most of this is from the 70s and early 80s.

5c7157 (28)  No.50917>>54810

File (hide): cc457268cf69699⋯.jpg (283.98 KB, 1598x954, 799:477, Forum Magazine - December ….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): c9a48e7edd4d1e5⋯.jpg (313.59 KB, 1852x713, 1852:713, Forum Magazine - February ….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 04546f3e4512d69⋯.jpg (209.71 KB, 1218x852, 203:142, Forum Magazine - January 1….jpg) (h) (u)


5c7157 (28)  No.50918>>54810

File (hide): 4c05ded4a1480d4⋯.jpg (389.28 KB, 1473x1270, 1473:1270, Forum Magazine - January 1….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): ca0ddc2dffb5909⋯.jpg (357.18 KB, 1536x1206, 256:201, Forum Magazine - June 1981….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): dd1c1542ac505e8⋯.jpg (357.26 KB, 1189x1231, 1189:1231, Forum Magazine - March 197….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): dd4d9217ed1c9d5⋯.jpg (221.74 KB, 1150x798, 575:399, Forum Magazine - May 1979 ….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 65969dea3c19c00⋯.jpg (337.64 KB, 1194x1225, 1194:1225, Forum Magazine - May 1983 ….jpg) (h) (u)


5c7157 (28)  No.50919>>54810

File (hide): ee3b5842eb9d1f5⋯.jpg (179.42 KB, 398x1544, 199:772, Forum Magazine - November ….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 7d2ea3366259d24⋯.jpg (130.51 KB, 373x1076, 373:1076, Forum Magazine - October 1….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 48c2f235943ad7c⋯.jpg (355.3 KB, 1490x1143, 1490:1143, Forum Magazine - October 1….jpg) (h) (u)


5c7157 (28)  No.50921>>54810

File (hide): 56229607690bdb8⋯.jpg (127.22 KB, 379x1028, 379:1028, Forum Magazine - September….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): f8d9628165ab7d5⋯.jpg (374.17 KB, 1750x1275, 70:51, Forum Magazine - September….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): e9e72eafb3cb2cf⋯.jpg (546.65 KB, 1331x1683, 121:153, Hustler Fantasies - Octobe….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 434599ea7c8192d⋯.jpg (420.28 KB, 1466x1177, 1466:1177, Oui Letters - November 198….jpg) (h) (u)


5c7157 (28)  No.50922>>54810

File (hide): 97e24a51ef41b9f⋯.jpg (565.58 KB, 2318x1227, 2318:1227, Human Digest Magazine - Ja….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): e975c7ed243cfda⋯.jpg (369.24 KB, 1560x1216, 195:152, Human Digest Magazine - Ja….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 677b70ba17ded56⋯.jpg (352.55 KB, 1564x1224, 23:18, Human Digest Magazine - Ja….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): da0baa6ae4e75e3⋯.jpg (329.78 KB, 1010x1161, 1010:1161, Tun-Ons Second Edition - V….jpg) (h) (u)


5c7157 (28)  No.50923>>54810

File (hide): c1320db15530049⋯.jpg (291.37 KB, 1307x1077, 1307:1077, Letters Magazine - August ….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 3b4a9ce0ecd4d28⋯.jpg (326.29 KB, 1470x1122, 245:187, Letters Magazine - August ….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): acb2bf45dfc3970⋯.jpg (352.81 KB, 1186x1201, 1186:1201, Letters Magazine - August ….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 0937bc2a67f9f14⋯.jpg (378.13 KB, 1567x1188, 1567:1188, Letters Magazine - August ….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): c3295b0b4ce886c⋯.jpg (395.18 KB, 1577x1186, 1577:1186, Letters Magazine - August ….jpg) (h) (u)


5c7157 (28)  No.50924>>54810

File (hide): ffea90b745236d8⋯.jpg (324.63 KB, 1586x1272, 793:636, Letters Magazine - March 1….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 332489aa83dd2a9⋯.jpg (467.61 KB, 1575x1273, 1575:1273, Letters Magazine - March 1….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): f1e42aeaa7ce966⋯.jpg (462.94 KB, 1563x1273, 1563:1273, Letters Magazine - March 1….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 426c977d8043761⋯.jpg (528.11 KB, 1578x1269, 526:423, Letters Magazine - March 1….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 69b5c084cab34ff⋯.jpg (220.28 KB, 833x1201, 833:1201, Letters Magazine - March 1….jpg) (h) (u)


5c7157 (28)  No.50926>>54810

File (hide): 87ac19a123f6434⋯.jpg (166.75 KB, 943x780, 943:780, Letters Magazine - Wet Pis….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 2e36011bd0d0022⋯.jpg (200.84 KB, 943x776, 943:776, Letters Magazine - Wet Pis….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): e98e8c2032a709b⋯.jpg (168.32 KB, 943x787, 943:787, Letters Magazine - Wet Pis….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): e58d80f6f5afb16⋯.jpg (245.06 KB, 948x787, 948:787, Letters Magazine - Wet Pis….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 13e9965b46cac96⋯.jpg (265.77 KB, 1174x1157, 1174:1157, Letters Magazine - Novembe….jpg) (h) (u)


5c7157 (28)  No.50927>>54810

File (hide): d41908740bed0e9⋯.jpg (352.72 KB, 1244x1212, 311:303, Penthouse Variations - Jan….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): d6766386b407d4e⋯.jpg (692.75 KB, 2327x1216, 2327:1216, Penthouse Variations - Jan….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): ea37d44a437098e⋯.jpg (331.51 KB, 1167x1223, 1167:1223, Penthouse Variations - Mar….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): c60fa485eaf00c0⋯.jpg (317.01 KB, 1156x1223, 1156:1223, Penthouse Variations - Oct….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 816287e6a16684a⋯.jpg (299.63 KB, 1110x1211, 1110:1211, Variations Magazine - June….jpg) (h) (u)


5c7157 (28)  No.50928>>54810

File (hide): 29ea5b04c9fc4ae⋯.jpg (336.34 KB, 1312x1135, 1312:1135, Variations Magazine - Marc….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): beb5c180ba01947⋯.jpg (636.51 KB, 2044x1239, 292:177, Variations Magazine - Nove….jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 2dc060ea14248b7⋯.jpg (194.2 KB, 604x932, 151:233, Cyberqueer Review.jpg) (h) (u)

Last batch! Sorry if the quality isn't incredible on these, most of them were scanned back in the late 90s I believe.


38ac29 (3)  No.50932

This post is super interesting. Definitely worth archiving it.


f103f2 (1)  No.50979>>50986 >>50992 >>51374 >>51380

this is fascinating

I had (wrongly, apparently) assumed that this was a relatively new phenomenon

interesting to see people being into it before I was alive


38ac29 (3)  No.50986

File (hide): 2b8b27d85d5db57⋯.png (101.29 KB, 1700x2200, 17:22, dinello1967 1 of 3.png) (h) (u)

File (hide): aa28570e4afe8f8⋯.png (122.72 KB, 1700x2200, 17:22, dinello1967 2 of 3.png) (h) (u)

File (hide): 8b6f77fba65e1d1⋯.png (104.04 KB, 1700x2200, 17:22, dinello1967 3 of 3.png) (h) (u)

>>50979

If you dig deep you'll find some accounts in academic articles talking about infantilism in the 60s.

Such as this one for instance from 1967:


5c7157 (28)  No.50992>>54461

File (hide): 6d7a7aa4297b932⋯.jpg (107.53 KB, 589x763, 589:763, fhm.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 200250c9cb82f46⋯.jpg (34.48 KB, 341x432, 341:432, Ordered To Wear A Diaper.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): d870c9558e526d8⋯.jpg (19.57 KB, 450x296, 225:148, Feeding 02.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 5824643ae0ca956⋯.jpg (16.74 KB, 363x276, 121:92, Bto_B_3.jpg) (h) (u)

>>50979

There was an entire world wide community of AB/DLs as far back as the 80s, who largely communicated through newsletters and such, via a publication called DPF or "Diaper Pail Friends", which then went on to become more widely spread through early BBS systems and then on Usenet in the early 90s via the newsgroup alt.sex.fetish.diapers, Bytemine, ABZ, etc, etc.

There were even several large scale "wars" within the community. For example in the late 90s there was a large rift created between ABs and what were known as TBs or Teen Babies, where the ABs basically wanted to force all the TBs out because they believed they made them look like pedophiles, which in turn garnered a lot of resentment and animosity amongst the teen babies who lashed out at the ABs in kind.

Ultimately it resulted in the creation of a number of sites specifically "for teens", basically owned by adults, but run by teens, for teens, with only mild supervision from the adults to keep out any potential child predators.


5c7157 (28)  No.50993

File (hide): 64404dd588afdb6⋯.jpg (59.64 KB, 846x567, 94:63, Group Shot 039.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 6a539bc04879320⋯.jpg (16.49 KB, 409x289, 409:289, Group Shot 040.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 2d8eb5a4012de81⋯.jpg (24.46 KB, 415x627, 415:627, Group Shot 041.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 4f405177a23c251⋯.jpg (33.17 KB, 733x521, 733:521, Group Shot 042.jpg) (h) (u)

There were a lot of popular gatherings too, like the "Bay To Breakers" race, that's probably the most famous of the AB/DL public gatherings. Basically picking an existing event and then showing up in diapers as a kind of "theme" or "costume" to blend in with all the regular folk.


5c7157 (28)  No.50994

File (hide): 08dbecb689ff00b⋯.jpg (39.98 KB, 562x854, 281:427, Group Shot 177.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 95bf4414d4e9694⋯.jpg (39.37 KB, 606x843, 202:281, Group Shot 178.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): eba5efcdaf0f525⋯.jpg (42.63 KB, 673x866, 673:866, Group Shot 179.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 47c79180d413b80⋯.jpg (46.06 KB, 613x960, 613:960, Group Shot 180.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 9d9d6d20a64fab9⋯.jpg (36.85 KB, 631x789, 631:789, Group Shot 181.jpg) (h) (u)

There was even quite a bit of commercial diaper porn produced back in the 70s and 80s, although much of it was pretty hard to come by.


1ad37f (1)  No.50995

Those old scans are amazing. As for the AB/TB Wars, I definitely remember those days. I was in the TB camp at the time, though my position has changed significantly. The "underage littles" debate on tumblr right now, definitely reminds me of it


0c2231 (1)  No.50997

Very interesting. I've heard tell of articles like this plenty of times but no one's ever had them on hand. Thanks for sharing.


5c7157 (28)  No.50998

File (hide): beb7dfaf185cbd4⋯.jpg (64.41 KB, 563x936, 563:936, Kelli002_anonib.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 8a8ef9e642f92e9⋯.jpg (62.59 KB, 588x933, 196:311, Kelli034_anonib.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 7286e63ed2d25f7⋯.jpg (40.43 KB, 454x600, 227:300, Kelli58_anonib.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 4809a3faf7fe5a8⋯.jpg (30.94 KB, 401x838, 401:838, Kelli61_anonib.jpg) (h) (u)

Here's a weird thought, Kelli here was a pregnant Bytemine model back in 1997… and her unborn baby would now be a full grown adult!


5c7157 (28)  No.50999

File (hide): 276b3189a84a771⋯.jpg (67.69 KB, 572x944, 143:236, Kelli063_anonib.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): d2e2641fc13fa9b⋯.jpg (71.48 KB, 588x938, 42:67, Kelli069_anonib.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 2354bb428ebe222⋯.jpg (71.29 KB, 583x938, 583:938, Kelli090_anonib.jpg) (h) (u)

Some more Kelli.


5c7157 (28)  No.51000

File (hide): 76fe350e698c9e7⋯.jpg (107.2 KB, 778x1072, 389:536, Bgkimcan0008.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 7f634eca448baa2⋯.jpg (67.83 KB, 584x828, 146:207, Bgkimcan0007.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 8fb645a44cedcb0⋯.jpg (116.96 KB, 795x1121, 795:1121, Bgkimcan0009.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 8bfbb882c988005⋯.jpg (92.77 KB, 785x1080, 157:216, Bgkimcan0011.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 4bd197aa71cc144⋯.jpg (103.5 KB, 1189x695, 1189:695, Bgkimcan0014.jpg) (h) (u)

Another interesting controversy of old was that of Kim, one of Bytemine's original models. Apparently she was used to doing sex/fetish type photo shoots and wanted to get in on the AB/DL scene because it paid more, but apparently she was NOT happy about it and HATED the community.

She had all sorts of misconceptions and thought every last one of us was a sick fuck and was apparently overly vocal about it during the photo shoot, to the point where they kept stopping in the middle of the shoot to ask her if she was even sure she wanted to continue, but apparently she felt the money was worth it, but acted like a pouty little brat the entire time.

I think Bytemine even wound up pulling the whole series because they felt she didn't represent the community very well and didn't want models who weren't comfortable doing AB/DL photo shoots.

I can post the whole series if anyone wants to see them.


2afb9d (1)  No.51003

Yes post it


5c7157 (28)  No.51008

File (hide): bcaf1f2a8c560f5⋯.jpg (96.92 KB, 601x843, 601:843, Bgkimcan0001.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 7a06defa46f770b⋯.jpg (75.79 KB, 596x788, 149:197, Bgkimcan0002.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 2ff9107dfe4c0bd⋯.jpg (81.87 KB, 587x818, 587:818, Bgkimcan0003.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 722269df71c4df2⋯.jpg (67.66 KB, 592x837, 592:837, Bgkimcan0004.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): ee17e810acb0930⋯.jpg (64.39 KB, 586x707, 586:707, Bgkimcan0005.jpg) (h) (u)

More pouty Kim.


5c7157 (28)  No.51009

File (hide): 76963539d14bf9b⋯.jpg (108.18 KB, 800x1099, 800:1099, Bgkimcan0006.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): c3c6b65d88fbec2⋯.jpg (117.17 KB, 795x1108, 795:1108, Bgkimcan0010.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): b4dc19822bac3c5⋯.jpg (102.99 KB, 1196x688, 299:172, Bgkimcan0012.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 054079d5c04cefa⋯.jpg (105.67 KB, 1180x691, 1180:691, Bgkimcan0013.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): b1424a44e4a8a62⋯.jpg (90.47 KB, 787x1096, 787:1096, Bgkimcan0015.jpg) (h) (u)


5c7157 (28)  No.51010

File (hide): ae7579ece650f3b⋯.jpg (107.78 KB, 1177x677, 1177:677, Bgkimcan0016.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 390bd684590ef66⋯.jpg (98.2 KB, 1187x688, 1187:688, Bgkimcan0017.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 432af99d05500b2⋯.jpg (102.85 KB, 1186x713, 1186:713, Bgkimcan0018.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 58d0f0ddbce9242⋯.jpg (98.28 KB, 1169x692, 1169:692, Bgkimcan0019.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 229b31b13d265e1⋯.jpg (94.6 KB, 1180x655, 236:131, Bgkimcan0020.jpg) (h) (u)


5c7157 (28)  No.51011

File (hide): 8b8b55fed4f609a⋯.jpg (93.43 KB, 800x1126, 400:563, Bgkimcan0021.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 1c7da20350bb416⋯.jpg (100.48 KB, 1179x719, 1179:719, Bgkimcan0022.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 480873168bb25c2⋯.jpg (95.8 KB, 794x999, 794:999, Bgkimcan0023.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): a4638df8818bba3⋯.jpg (62.44 KB, 596x856, 149:214, Bgkimcan0028.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 2157fac09cc860e⋯.jpg (86.79 KB, 786x1047, 262:349, Bgkimcan0029.jpg) (h) (u)

Apparently I'm missing 24 thru 27, presuming Bill ever released them at all.


5c7157 (28)  No.51012>>51384

File (hide): 63b6971b7e83cc5⋯.jpg (64.1 KB, 594x848, 297:424, Bgkimcan0030.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 600bff295594063⋯.jpg (61.39 KB, 880x532, 220:133, Bgkimcan0031.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 1f7f521dcd0d816⋯.jpg (59.17 KB, 887x515, 887:515, Bgkimcan0032.jpg) (h) (u)

Last of the ones I have. Not sure if there's any more anywhere (probably not).

I'll see if I can find some other good old stuff to put up. I've got around a half terabyte of diaper stuff from pre 2005, but most of it is completely unsorted (like I would just archive entire sites, strip mining every bit of data).


5c7157 (28)  No.51271

File (hide): 82674e63a710132⋯.jpg (43.92 KB, 868x468, 217:117, Holly 01.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): f4b5ba3f3ba2c03⋯.jpg (81.64 KB, 576x876, 48:73, Holly 02.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 8d950158db04350⋯.jpg (76.61 KB, 440x880, 1:2, Holly 03.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): a6848e2108f33f3⋯.jpg (36.32 KB, 288x438, 48:73, Holly 04.jpg) (h) (u)

Some more old stuff, from sometime back in the 90s. This is all I have of her.


892391 (1)  No.51369>>51370

>>51272

>she

lol


5c7157 (28)  No.51370

>>51369

I base pronouns primarily on looks, if someone looks like a girl… it's a she. If they look like a boy… it's a he. If they don't really look like either one it's a… *confused face*

Relationship wise my pronouns are "ewww a penis" and "how pretty is your pussy"? If it looks like a meat plane violently crashed on into your crotch space it's… *yikes*


5c7157 (28)  No.51372

File (hide): 50d343c659d1d33⋯.jpg (105.02 KB, 706x669, 706:669, 1003wpthumbsuck.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): d7d7fb1c079ed4a⋯.jpg (64.25 KB, 476x763, 68:109, auc13092.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 61b50132c02025e⋯.jpg (11.27 KB, 183x432, 61:144, Woman 020.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 832e0d18966e9ac⋯.jpg (103.99 KB, 862x1218, 431:609, dress1.jpg) (h) (u)

Some more random oldies.

I should start a thread just for old Bytemine/Byteshop stuff… I think I have the complete collection from ~1995 all the way up to like ~2005.


5c7157 (28)  No.51373

File (hide): 364cc533b510e18⋯.jpg (80.63 KB, 618x474, 103:79, Betty Page - 01.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 8f94b06b1a16ab4⋯.jpg (37.59 KB, 600x463, 600:463, Betty Page - 02.jpg) (h) (u)

Probably the oldest of the old fetish models, here's Betty Page from the 1950s. Best known for soft core bondage pics, very tame by today's standards. In these two she's sportin a babyish motif.


8a22d4 (2)  No.51374>>51381

>>50979

Do…do you think there were furries back in the 1700s?


bc06c2 (1)  No.51380>>51382

>>50979

There was supposedly Victorian/Edwardian era parties where adults acted like children. It apparently had a special name but it's been lost to time.


5c7157 (28)  No.51381>>51386

>>51374

There have been furries all throughout human history. The Egyptians especially, to the point of worshiping human/animal hybrid deities.


8a22d4 (2)  No.51382

>>51380

My only regret is that, if I were alive back then, that I'd either be in my Irish family and dying of famine or in my British family and dying at work.


230a5f (1)  No.51384

>>51012

Is it possible you could upload a bunch of the old bytemine stuff? I love the aesthetic and I feel like whenever I find something from that era its like gold to me.


d2fc67 (1)  No.51386>>54810

>>51381

That's not the same thing


e49fa1 (1)  No.51390>>51414

As far as the fetish is concerned, I'm still not surprised that diapers are just a conduit for watersports back in the day given general lack of paraphernalia and cloth diapers being awful for messing.

Still, some of these are tales are just fascinating (though I doubt more than a few aren't even close to reality).


5c7157 (28)  No.51414

>>51390

Well, a large part of why it didn't exist is because diapers as we know them are actually a relatively new invention… in fact in some parts of the world, like China, a lot of people still don't use diapers. Instead they put their babies in what are called "split pants" and they basically just pee/poop on the floor or they try and use that "elimination language" hilariousness.

Even early civilizations that had something like a diaper used some pretty bizarre stuff. And I don't think it was particularly enjoyable in any sense, especially given that they could apparently go days without actually changing the "diaper wrappings".

I think a lot of sexual fetishes are largely developed at infancy, primarily fueled by tactile interaction/experiences. In this day in age with diaper creams, powders, plushie soft diapers and so forth I don't see it as much a surprise that AB/DL interests and associated fetishes have become much more prevalent.

Diapering on the whole has become convenient and caring where as in ye olden times it was a tedious bother/chore and often the entire experience of those makeshift diapers was just painful and uncomfortable for the babies.

Likewise, the entire concept of "loving" a baby is actually something relatively new. It used to be that in the past that the norm was not to get too attached until after the kid had reached about five years of age… because the mortality rate was so astronomically high.

In our modern age it's the exact opposite though, babies are often showered with the greatest level of love/affection/attention, which is likewise fueling AB/DL interests.

This entire fetish is fast becoming mainstream, especially in the wake of artists like Melanie Martinez and Miley Cyrus's "BB Talk" and so forth. I'd estimate that within 10 years it'll be as well established as BDSM is now and within 50 years it'll become as pedestrian as corsets and cross dressing.


718f65 (13)  No.52549>>59209

File (hide): 6f39a0a60471761⋯.jpg (79.35 KB, 900x615, 60:41, 0079wringerbcw.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 4269eada9b130e1⋯.jpg (102.41 KB, 592x900, 148:225, 079wringerb_anne43.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 37d9486b1aa925c⋯.jpg (96.8 KB, 602x900, 301:450, 079wringerb_anne47.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 070cf0f299fb53e⋯.jpg (102.72 KB, 900x598, 450:299, 79wringerb_anne71.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 68849bed5ce2edf⋯.jpg (119.3 KB, 900x651, 300:217, 011018wspbk36.jpg) (h) (u)

Oh, oops, there's like a bunch more of these. Some of them have been colorized I think. They were originally posted by some incredibly old diaper dude who went by the name Wringer… who is probably dead by now because he was already way old when he originally posted these back in the 90s.


718f65 (13)  No.52550

File (hide): f921e08dae8f2c9⋯.jpg (78.86 KB, 900x586, 450:293, 011106wsrp02.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 27cdd8d5de4a8ec⋯.jpg (221.54 KB, 615x900, 41:60, 820929wringerbac103.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 75f8b53d3331c89⋯.jpg (224.03 KB, 616x900, 154:225, 820929wringerbac104.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 7c343c343be6f65⋯.jpg (228.02 KB, 900x608, 225:152, 820929wringerbac105.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 94ce1f9e2ee5526⋯.jpg (177.21 KB, 614x900, 307:450, 820929wringerbac202.jpg) (h) (u)


718f65 (13)  No.52551

File (hide): 2cf3d4db4603bf9⋯.jpg (191.73 KB, 595x900, 119:180, 820929wringerbac203.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 03f6e8a75f5f6c7⋯.jpg (210.14 KB, 900x604, 225:151, 820929wringerbac215.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): bbe65b6f6224736⋯.jpg (217.62 KB, 900x617, 900:617, 820929wringerbac217.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): f927312fb162d21⋯.jpg (30.6 KB, 559x332, 559:332, Heather 01.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 33599f0f0820cf0⋯.jpg (37.21 KB, 393x546, 131:182, Heather 03.jpg) (h) (u)


718f65 (13)  No.52552

File (hide): 81373d4fd8a2fb0⋯.jpg (35.15 KB, 524x338, 262:169, Woman 036.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 88bebde524de1ed⋯.jpg (61.97 KB, 891x611, 891:611, Woman 102.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 3759f246334b0ff⋯.jpg (45.39 KB, 457x768, 457:768, Bondage Diapers 01.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 5c0f74f5c7b753d⋯.jpg (62.81 KB, 768x464, 48:29, Bondage Diapers 12.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): c489ac907a0b134⋯.jpg (42.25 KB, 764x512, 191:128, Beverly 02.jpg) (h) (u)

The one on the end has bit level corruption… may not even upload correctly.


718f65 (13)  No.52553>>59209

File (hide): 527891c06143f1e⋯.jpg (129.63 KB, 543x790, 543:790, Beverly 03.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 87195f2fba26928⋯.jpg (59.85 KB, 641x906, 641:906, Beverly 19.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): b07e179d46f4101⋯.jpg (66.73 KB, 917x679, 131:97, Beverly 21.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): f794c63d8c3c4fd⋯.jpg (60.07 KB, 663x989, 663:989, Beverly 22.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): d6b8afc401b36b9⋯.jpg (71.3 KB, 995x652, 995:652, Beverly 23.jpg) (h) (u)

…I have no idea where the missing ones are. I'll try and find them though if I can.


718f65 (13)  No.52554

File (hide): 08102afe3c59b1d⋯.jpg (68 KB, 923x702, 71:54, Beverly 24.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 0b286e8d188944b⋯.jpg (69.84 KB, 912x674, 456:337, Beverly 25.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): a812ab3e25be8e6⋯.jpg (63.91 KB, 917x657, 917:657, Beverly 26.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): a4bc1940aed2546⋯.jpg (85.12 KB, 570x900, 19:30, 850714wringersash014.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 90f2c5b8481b818⋯.jpg (87.5 KB, 577x900, 577:900, 850714wringersash015.jpg) (h) (u)


718f65 (13)  No.52555

File (hide): fbac4982dc269e6⋯.jpg (32.84 KB, 720x890, 72:89, Sasha 02.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 7546c8df5457ea4⋯.jpg (29.23 KB, 538x1043, 538:1043, Sasha 10.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 2a4a0724dbfafc6⋯.jpg (45.81 KB, 600x406, 300:203, Sasha 12.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 09947cd46859901⋯.jpg (41.85 KB, 564x390, 94:65, Sasha 13.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): a1a21e92ce81639⋯.jpg (44.82 KB, 600x416, 75:52, Sasha 19.jpg) (h) (u)


718f65 (13)  No.52556

File (hide): 3d937023fb6c8b3⋯.jpg (32.87 KB, 343x600, 343:600, Sasha 21.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 0d9d22bd866eead⋯.jpg (81.36 KB, 600x843, 200:281, Sasha 29.jpg) (h) (u)

Again, I have no idea what's with the numbering system… either he only originally uploaded part of his collection, it became corrupt/damaged on an older drive I salvaged from, or maybe there in some other folder… in this huge ass multi-terabyte mess.


718f65 (13)  No.52558

File (hide): 8ae4d4e22ab7e65⋯.jpg (310.77 KB, 1800x1244, 450:311, 021112wbd01.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 6352ecea039ecad⋯.jpg (110.32 KB, 480x720, 2:3, sasha school.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 0ca642f54a934fc⋯.jpg (85.32 KB, 720x480, 3:2, Sashaschool2.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 6d22e8826dfac18⋯.jpg (60.28 KB, 354x720, 59:120, Sashaschool3.jpg) (h) (u)

Okay this last batch is… weird.

I guess the girl, the actual girl in the photos, didn't want her face to be shown or… something. So then Wringer took Sasha's face and then Photoshopped it onto the original girl's face to cover it up… anyway it's just fucking weird, but that's how he uploaded them.


c9c180 (1)  No.52586

Thanks for sharing all of this. All of this older stuff is fascinating


38ac29 (3)  No.54459


bc2ae9 (6)  No.54461>>54463 >>54468

>>50992

I have some DPF history to kick in.

The ORIGINAL newsletter was called Lil Wrangler run by a man I think was called Glen. (I'm sure it was a G name. I was told this story nearly a decade ago). It was originally exclusively gay men.

When he aged out of being able to run the newsletter he sold the roster to Tommy. DPF was originally titled Diaper Pail Fraternity then rebranded to friends as a few females popped up. Eventually expanding into the website.

Tommy was allegedly very litigious and threatened lawsuits on other abdl newsletters that had popped up.


718f65 (13)  No.54463

>>54461

Tommy also, allegedly, went around using the DPF roster to forcibly "out" adult babies, which, according to rumor, resulted in one adult baby being discharged from the military over it.

Not sure how much truth to those rumors there was, but there was a LOT of animosity towards the guy as I recall.


bc2ae9 (6)  No.54466>>54473

> Ultimately it resulted in the creation of a number of sites specifically "for teens", basically owned by adults, but run by teens, for teens, with only mild supervision from the adults to keep out any potential child predators.

I joined in the early millenium as a TB. There was a LOT of child predators back then. Being so seperated from that age range now and forums being an outdated relic I'm not quite sure the threats they have today.

There of course was the DPF Teen Room, which at that point was almost always unmoderated and pedos were actively recruiting. People far worse then deeker.

DPF is where Yior the Cobb tried to recruit me to his site. I was young and naive at the time. He was busted for running a diaper pedo picture ring.

He was a mall santa and daycare operator named Brian Cobb. You can still find remnants of his bust through google and archive.org

He did the world a favour and committed suicide back in 2012.

A less publicized bust was diaper-boys.biz

Shut down for the admin being a pedo and distriburing pictures of underage kids in diapers. I think they had a state in their name, but my memories of it are very vague.

There were good forums though, originally run by teens that eventually grew into adults.

TeenBabyNet was one if them. The original site teenbaby.net went down and I don't know the whole story behind it. Teenbabynet was owned by a guy named Joe.

There was a falling out with a mod at the time who went by Ashen who wiped all of his posts from the forum.

He splintered off with much of the european userbase to… shit i think it was just tbdl.net (?). One day the server allegedly went tits up (though he was accused of doing it intentionally); and he opened a rebranded website as ADISC and went by Moo. It's ironic as a preservation tactic he later expelled all of the teens from ADISC when the original purpose of places like it was somewhere teens could explore this fetish without being groomed by predators.


bc2ae9 (6)  No.54468>>54469 >>54471

>>54461

I did some digging and found a more complete version of this story.

---

Actually, Tommy got his idea from the late Gene Clennon. Gene had the first roster listing of ABs/DLs - Li'l Wrangler - that I'd ever seen. This would have been 1978-80, or so. Before that, there were random ads in various publications - Advocate, Penthouse Letters, etc. I worked for Gene until he became too ill to run Li'l Wrangler, which was then sold to Tommy and became DPF. Some of Gene's photos from his photo sets are still floating around the Internet, 30 years later.

---

Exactly. Tommy was as far from a pioneer as there could be. I would place him as more of a community leech. Other people would start projects and he would steal them and incorporate them into his own ventures with no credit to anyone. He even attempted to file lawsuits against true early pioneers, claiming he owned the rights to the terms Adult Baby, Diaper Lover and AB/DL.

I still have the nasty letter I got from his lawyer about 15 years ago when I opened a site with photos of myself and my wife. He threatened to sue me for using those terms among other things. I should dig it out for some laughs…

Turns out rearz wasnt the first to try to own ABDL as a term.

I also found some old german forum talking about the shut down but no solid details on why. Conspiracies they were hacked or taken dowb by American FBI, NSA, or CIA.

What's disturbing and gives some real insight into the issues with our community at the time is there are posts openly attempting to justify the kiddie pictures and no one seeks to think anything of it. It's big part why you'll see so many millenial abdls operate on such a hair trigger. The community was absolutely drenched in filth like thrm back then.

http://www.wb-community.com/showthread.php?25426-was-ist-mit-diaper-boys-biz


bc2ae9 (6)  No.54469

>>54468

Scratch that, there's a second page that erupts into debate finally with people openly defending owning child porn. But it does give the details. Still… took a whole page of conversation for someone to point out they're fucked up, and evidently not controversial enough that any of those defending their CP were banned or the topic deleted. There looks to be far more defending diaper CP.

It was a rough time to be a young kid with a fetish back then.

robino :

25.03.2005 18:46

Maybe some of you were once a member of diaper-boys.biz. You should therefore have the name dad2mndiaperboy and mndiaperboy or somehow so familiar. The photos of this boy were uploaded to diaper-boys.biz (were always on the right side of Index.html in such a kind of picture preview). Well, these pictures are child pornography (at least that's what the American courts said) and were shot by a pedosexual person who also let this boy live with him during vacations and so on.

Of course, this person who, as far as I know, was later moderator on the site had a completely different story, but then you can see how hard you can trust such pictures.

Anyone who understands English can read a news article about the arrest of the person that it is dad2mndiaperboy I can not testify, but some of the users will have already known the correct name of the guy, and of which I finally have the Link and Info: http://www.unioneagle.com/2005/March/24charges.html (Translation via world.altavista.com)

My opinion on the subject: Everyone has to know for himself what he is doing, so I can download thousands of such pictures from me and I will not look at him for that. Nevertheless, he should be aware that some of these images may have arisen from "not so great" situations, and therefore are just morally questionable. I prefer to see pictures of women in diapers, but most of them are just shit, and I do not find them sexually arousing. Oh yeah, you should be aware that although you can talk a lot about it, but as you can see such pictures are taken seriously as child pornography. I do not know how you are, but I would not take such a risk. I do not have to have such an entry with the police, especially because then certainly not the complete report, but just "fine / imprisonment for the possession of child pornography" is.


bc2ae9 (6)  No.54471

>>54468

Same ancient ADISC threae also had some more info on Tommy being a piecd of shit and other earlt ABDLs.

---

I heard about things like that, that Tommy would threaten to sue other ABs cause he thought he owned adult baby or something. Tommy… he was and always was a creep to me. He kept the rosters list up and that has ruined lives. He thought people should pay to see stuff about adult babies. Tommy was a greedy bastard.

I had a friend of mine try to get a job and lost out because his name was still on the roster when they did a background check and found his name listed as a babysitter. I have heard also that Tommy was a bitter, unhappy man.

---

You are totally right about Gene being the pioneer what was DPF as Tommy used Gene's contact list. Gotta remember back when DPF started it was called "Diaper Pail Fraternity" - meaning it started primarily for men, particularly gay men as that was what the original list Gene had was made of.

Later when more straight men and women began to request membership to DPF Tommy eventually changed it to "Diaper Pail Friends"

As there was no internet and had to rely on what was in print. DPF, at the time, was a God send for many of us. We thought we were alone, only to find DPF did we find we were not.

When there was a move to the internet, Tommy was not internet savy and had to rely on others to set up DPF for him. For awhile it was the best that ab/dl had. The links were good, the chat was not that bad, otherwise had to rely on IRC for communicating with other ab/dl. So anything was better than nothing back when.

As far as the "Store" Tommy had it was not the best. Many discovered where his sources of supplies came from - Babykins, VIP, Langley to name a few and you could get them at a better price. When there weren't a lot of videos out there, Tommy produced some or got people to do some for him. He filled a "niche" that wasn't available back then.

Tommy and his significant other - Marky is interested in selling, but so far nothing has been done to accomplish it as Tommy is in no condition to do anymore business so is dependent on Marky.

As far as historically who were significant to ab/dl beside Gene, well that's another story. But there were names like: Cathy Slavic "Infantae Press" out of Seattle, Washington; Carolyn of "Carolyn's Kids" out of Mass; Linda Brownleigh or "Linda Latex" out of North Carolina; Florence from The South SF Bay area in California, "Tales from the Crib" just to name a few. .

Seeming confirmation that Tommy effectively outted people by, at least, never removing anyone from the roster. Really interesting is the second post that drops some early names and info.

Sorry for the tangent here. Wasnt actually expecting to find info this easily. Curious if others can kick up some rocks on early history. Like who actually coined ABDL.


718f65 (13)  No.54472

File (hide): 93cec0c10988f30⋯.gif (93.63 KB, 1272x1631, 1272:1631, Baby Games.gif) (h) (u)

I'm still sorting files so I keep finding new stuff. Not sure what this is from exactly… probably one of the early printed newsletter publications.

Not sure who originally coined the term "adult baby" or "diaper lover" but I ~think~ they were already in prominent usage back in the 90s, so I would hazard a guess that they likely originate from some psychology text or book.

That's normally how it goes, when you write a psych book you might start out using more "scientific" terms like paraphilic infantilism, but that doesn't usually hold people's interest or attention so you normally need to come up with a simplified/layman's term, which is likely where it came from.

The term "little" came from me though, I know that much for certain, because back in the day I was generally pissed off and disillusioned with the entire adult baby community as a whole. Mostly I didn't like how they were centered so heavily on sexual interests and I wanted to create a kind of Disney version of the fetish that was more "all inclusive" that could include all forms of age play and to any extent, whether it be just coloring with crayons, sucking on your pencil like a pacifier, having plushies or other transitional objects, etc, etc.

So I started a FaceBook page called "Littles" and a site called "Dreamation" that centered heavily on those concepts and creating a more pedestrian friendly version of the fetish.

…unfortunately though the term was quickly bastardized, eventually giving rise to the term "Little Space" and now it's commonly confused with adult babies and sexual interests and the whole DD/LG movement so it's kind of ruined.


ede2c4 (1)  No.54473>>54783

>>54466

Hearing about all this makes me happy sometimes that I got into this scene a bit later.

That could have been nasty to deal with.


718f65 (13)  No.54541>>54767

File (hide): b1c03b32a619cee⋯.jpg (126.03 KB, 635x728, 635:728, $(KGrHqR,!joE2IP2E8ufBNjKq….JPG) (h) (u)

File (hide): 059bfc92d43b820⋯.jpg (6.1 KB, 259x194, 259:194, _______BR0dLn3dmw~~60_es.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 991900ebd785708⋯.png (54.56 KB, 660x431, 660:431, Article - sdf459.png) (h) (u)

File (hide): 095f881787e9e69⋯.png (354.98 KB, 344x500, 86:125, gk18.jpg.png) (h) (u)

More random things I've come across sorting files.

I forgot all about Garbage Pail Kids, they were pretty disgusting for the most part, but I remember being intrigued by all the prominent diaper art. Probably the earliest examples of "hyper mess" style diaper art.


310326 (1)  No.54767>>54768


718f65 (13)  No.54768

>>54767

I think it was a post for 640x480 resolution. I've been hoping I come across some larger versions.


bc2ae9 (6)  No.54783

>>54473

It really was. I have to chuckle at the age gap thread, let alone thinking this new generation is only the third.

Even if we grouped all of the pre-internet into one generation, there's still been 2 generations online at least. Youngins today are 4th or 5th in terms of communications upheavals.

> Seeming confirmation that Tommy effectively outted people by, at least, never removing anyone from the roster. Really interesting is the second post that drops some early names and info.

Sort of ironic considering the server story with ADISC, but that's generally how I feel about there now. I guess because of the backlash from the first crash the admin never lets ANYTHING expire.

I was smart enough when I was young to keep seperate identities for the most part with only very loose potential connections. But there's still a lot of stuff it'd be nice if they at least put behind the login screen if not scrub all together.

I can't imagine how it is for people that weren't as smart as teens and have an email or common username connected to that place.


a09682 (1)  No.54810>>56460

>>50916 (OP)

>>50917

>>50918

>>50919

>>50921

>>50922

>>50923

>>50924

>>50926

>>50927

>>50928

HOLY SHIT, THIS IS FUCKING GOLD!!!

i guess this feeling its what an archeologist feels when digging into the past

>>51386

Furries start been furies by trying to be 'as brave as a lion' or 'as gracious ans pretty as some bird'

perhaps the drawing quality and societal limitations where different at the times, but i feel that the intention and wanting to be animal-like, just as the furries do, was quite similar


45e9d9 (1)  No.56460

>>54810

>i guess this feeling its what an archeologist feels when digging into the past

I totally got this feeling as well XD


67a3c1 (3)  No.56462>>56489 >>56492

Whats the oldest ABDL reference you guys have seen?

I have a theory about ABDL that basically ties it's growth to the decline of infant mortality.That is; basically the fetish requires childhood to be safe, a concept increasingly more prevalent to the common person since the 50s


049ca3 (1)  No.56489

>>56462

If it were to have anything to do with it, it would be one smaller thing in a large group of reasons.


e658f8 (1)  No.56492

>>56462

There's probably earlier references out there, but the first one that comes to mind for me, is the book Breakfast at Tiffany's (never saw the movie).

Anyway, there's an ABDL character in the book, who is one of the old, rich men that Holly GoLightly is using for favors/money. Not a very positive depiction of ABDLs.

The book was published in 1958 but is apparently based on experiences Truman Capote had in the 1940's.


0ad69a (2)  No.57647

Interesting thread.


0ad69a (2)  No.59209

>>52553

>>52549

Med. fetish and ABDL. Very interesting.


c58275 (1)  No.65750

So, abdl was a think back in that time also, huh how knew.


d86d34 (1)  No.68963>>74329

File (hide): 0e97d0de5fb7629⋯.jpg (197.76 KB, 580x908, 145:227, 198047_1020_A.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 30fa321af4c2c77⋯.jpg (55.77 KB, 350x549, 350:549, baby_puss2.jpg) (h) (u)

Tom and Jerry


45fbfe (1)  No.74313>>74323 >>74328

>>50916 (OP)

Where’d you get all these from? Is there more of this online somewhere, or is this from your own collection?


bfa874 (1)  No.74323

>>74313

Look at OP's name. OP is a faggot.


c7a235 (1)  No.74328>>76087 >>76088

>>74313

If I had to guess probably pulled from abkingdom. Unfortunately you have to pay if you want their older/archived stuff


67a3c1 (3)  No.74329>>74330 >>74332

>>68963

I hear a lot of people saying this episode 'made them abdl' as kid, and was just wondering how true it was for you guys?

I know as a kid i was fascinated with the episode and after it used to pretend my tighty whities were a diaper (not actually peeing in it, just imagining they were)


ebb34f (2)  No.74330>>74331

>>74329

No

Because that is not how it works


67a3c1 (3)  No.74331

>>74330

sure, but seeing something like this makes you aware of your feelings towards it


082804 (1)  No.74332>>74339

>>74329

What really got me as a kid was an episode of Genie From Down Under where the main girl accidentally wished to be turned into a baby. I hope someone else knows the one I mean.


ebb34f (2)  No.74339

>>74332

That, and that tv movie with the failing genie, and the kid who wants to be appealing to a girl


104679 (2)  No.76087

>>74328

>abkingdom

I’m so happy I favorited hundreds of photos before the paywall. I can still see them


104679 (2)  No.76088

>>74328

Also, you can still access anything if you know the persons username. You just can’t see the feed


000000 (1)  No.83628

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Screencap][Nerve Center][Cancer][Update] ( Scroll to new posts) ( Auto) 5
83 replies | 40 images | 32 UIDs | Page ?
[Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / baaa / caco / choroy / dempart / doomer / hypno / sw ][ watchlist ]