[ / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / abdl / fur / g / htg / newbrit / s / shota / vore ][Options][ watchlist ]

/abdl/ - Adult Baby - Diaper Lover

All about ageplay!

Catalog

You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

File (hide): 7aad28c07bb60b7⋯.jpeg (327.46 KB, 1198x842, 599:421, image.jpeg) (h) (u)

[–]

 No.37441>>37520 >>37558 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

Which brands of diapers are to your knowledge not owned by big pharma? I just don't want to support them more than I have to since I know they at least are a bunch of lowlifes that have pushed policies that have ruined millions of lives, and at worst have suppressed cures for diseases that could've saved millions of lives. Point is I don't want to buy any diapers if it'll contribute to harming others I'm even willing to quit cold turkey if there aren't any that aren't owned by big pharma.

 No.37461

Pretty sure you'd be safe buying anything specifically made for ABDLs. Rearz and ABU are just 2 examples.

And these are the best kinds to get anyways. The ones in pharmacies are """"""""""""discrete"""""""""""", which actually means they hold like 2 drops of piss before they leak all over your legs.


 No.37520>>37555 >>38157 >>38203

File (hide): 536b6f7f9ffca78⋯.png (784.47 KB, 1990x762, 995:381, cdb92d32c7273e1e2c6e7a5eb5….png) (h) (u)

>>37441 (OP)

>ethical consumption under capitalism

Stupid, dumb, lifestylist scum


 No.37555

>>37520

I could usually care less about ethical consumption but big pharma is an exception


 No.37558>>38177

File (hide): 18b360fd4257d05⋯.png (501.47 KB, 840x574, 60:41, reality-of-auschwitz.png) (h) (u)

>>37441 (OP)

Cloth ones.


 No.37570>>37612

From someone who actually had lectures for years on the subject.

They charge a shitload for the newest drugs, which they worked on for years.

Imagine it like this.

1 in 1000 projects (each costing a shitload of millions) has an effect in the lab they desire.

1 in 100 of those working will be able to be used on humans.

Which one of these thousands of projects will work is not clear before. It is an immense investment and they have to make the money back in 3-4 years in which they have the rights for the drug.

Without them none of the modern drugs would have been invented. Those are people who gamble immense amounts of money to get a return at the same time helping humanity for possibly as long as we exist with their advancements, which in a few years after they can sell the drugs are open for cheaper copies.

The big ones are those who won the gamble and reinvest their gains into research for more new drugs, helping to treat illnesses and 5 years down the line will be replicated for much cheaper.

The money is not in meds older than 10 years or diapers which anyone can make.

The big money is in the new drugs and their licensing.

But if you feel better not supporting people who use their gains for medical research from an ideological basis, refuse their drugs when you need them and go die off Hepatitis instead.


 No.37612>>38158 >>38174

>>37570

>I was told what to think for years and think you should think this way too despite going against simple common sense, thank you based big pharma! *slobbering sounds from ferociously licking a boot*

LOL


 No.38157>>38168

>>37520

>brainwashed commie turd with an insanely contradictory ideology whining about muh ethics

lol

Day of the helicopter when?


 No.38158>>38177

>>37612

Big pharma is corrupt as shit and obviously in bed with the government but they've saved countless lives with the drugs they've developed. They've saved many more lives than they have killed from bad drugs.

Not everything is one sided, you brain damaged leftist.


 No.38168

>>38157

just shut up and be my diaper bf already


 No.38174

>>37612

The cost to develop a new drug is somewhere between 800 million to 2.6 billion, this is mainly due to legal government constraints and safety procedures.

That is the cost to make effectively 1 pill.

Now take into account the cost of manufacturing, bottling, shipping, advertising (because docs dont keep up on new meds that they can prescribe so they need to be informed) advertising to pharmacies to stock your drug, etc.

It is well into the billions to do this. Along the way there are many losses and this takes years of nothing happening so that time needs to be paid for.

You people really know nothing of business, you hear "people are charging for medicine" and assume its a right.

No one has a right to live you earn that, with sweat blood and tears.


 No.38177>>38181

>>37558

>they have to make the money back in 3-4 years in which they have the rights for the drug

They have a lot longer than that to make their money back. Go to any doctor and see how many generics are actually on offer. If your claim was true, 99% of the drugs available would be generics. The companies do all sorts of anticompetitive shit to increase their profits at the expense of patients' wellbeing, up to and including bribing doctors. Their marketing budgets are typically of the same order of magnitude as their research budgets.

>>38158

If I joined the fire service and let 50% of houses burn down for my own profit, you wouldn't be praising me for saving the other 50%. There is a concept in economics called "opportunity cost". The opportunity cost of their actions is measured in human lives.


 No.38181

>>38177

99% of drugs have generics you dumbass. You only hear about the new small % that dont have a generic version because they are used to treat new dangerous conditions.

And you have for some reason forgotten there are millions of old dangerous conditions that generics exist for currently.


 No.38184>>38188

I can't think of a single diaper brand owned by a pharmaceutical company.

Where did you get the idea that they are?

Pharma companies don't even make a lot of medical equipment. They certainly don't make a lot of diapers.

Tena/SCA? Makes paper products in general

Abena? Makes stuff like toilet paper and soap

Depends? Kimberly-Clark, also paper products

Attends? Domtar, only diapers

Also, you're an idiot for thinking "big pharma" are evil. For the good of the gene pool, I recommend that you don't use any of their products when you get sick.


 No.38188>>38193 >>38198

>>38184

Even if you're a big pharma shill, you are right that most diapers are made by (((paper companies)))

Here, enjoy a padded merchant for bothering to visit us


 No.38191>>38198

I feel like we're about to summon Martin Shkreli from this thread


 No.38193>>38197 >>38198

>>38188

Shlomo, the goyim know! Shut down the paper mills!


 No.38197>>38198 >>38223

File (hide): 8387552abc3cbfb⋯.jpg (100.16 KB, 399x600, 133:200, 139343659173.jpg) (h) (u)

>>38193

>yfw strong attraction to kosher girls


 No.38198

>>38188

>>38191

>>38193

>>38197

hey samefag brigade I feel that if you are worried about big pharma you should at least know who this "big pharma" is.

Novartis AG, successful patent holders of a whopping 21 drugs.

Big pharma jr. would be Merck & Co Inc owners of 16 drugs.

and last but not least we have Johnson & Johnson with 15 drugs total.

All in all big pharma composed of 12 companies owns 139 total drugs on the market. with a few that have already lost their patent.

Every other drug on the market has a generic, oh and to save you some time the "epipen" isnt on that list, because you can't patent Epinephrine.

Anyone (with a prescription) can buy a bottle of epinephrine and syringes for $6, the only patented part is the single use dispenser system.

Seriously I will never understand you faggots and your obsession with that epipen shit.


 No.38203>>38204 >>38218

>>37520

/leftyabdl/ when


 No.38204>>38231

>>38203

Never

>communist and nazis fight

>mommy steps in to spank us

Matriarchy tbh fam


 No.38218

>>38203

There is already is one and it's called /leftypol/


 No.38223>>38228

>>38197

(((Her))) race is so wrong but she looks damn good in a diaper. Does it still count as miscegenation if we keep the diapers on?


 No.38228

>>38223

It's only miscenation if you get her pregnant. Of course if a girl fucks a guy it's aways miscegenation on her part (ie coalburners)

Anyway, she probably has an instinctual inclination towards degeneracy. She can't help that she likes letting go of her bladder and bowels in her pants


 No.38231

File (hide): 85445f16e71209e⋯.jpg (33.22 KB, 523x452, 523:452, thispleasesstirner.jpg) (h) (u)

>>38204

The only kind of idpol I don't mind because it aligns with my fetishes.

>spank me harder mommy, I've been so naughty


 No.38234

Aren't like all diapers made in China? Good luck with your moralfagging!


 No.38305

oy vey! there is too much goyim knowing going on in this thread….

SHUT IT DOWN!




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Screencap][Update] ( Scroll to new posts) ( Auto) 5
26 replies | 8 images | Page ?
[Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / abdl / fur / g / htg / newbrit / s / shota / vore ][ watchlist ]