/8bantb/ - Random Banter

Doesn't explain how moving threads into an off topic section somehow prevents it from becoming a platform for hosting illegal things like CP or drug trades that would get the site taken down.

>>1939

this, seems way fucking off

>>1948

>>1939

>>1957

i'm guessing you guys don't know the history, but this site used to be called masterchan which was basically the big pedo imageboard, but I think they got their servers seized or something and rebranded as enrive. So if you're wondering how they deal with pedo content, the answer is they dont. masterchan was always accused of being a honeypot but enrive is probably most definitely a honeypot.

>>1972

Iirc the owner of the site and admin was the only one that could actually delete things (but he would actually delete hardcore cp rather than just marking it as off-topic), but he was lenient with what qualifies as cp.

CP aside I didn't care for it.

>>1975

>>1972

Where do you come up with this shit?

The name was changed because when it was masterchan it was only a pc gaming chan. When it became more than that it was rebranded.

>was lenient with what qualifies as cp

Enrive mods always deleted pics that were oversexualized, unlike 8chans hebe board which allowed all sorts of illegal content for years. If enrive had allowed illegal content, it would have been more popular as it would have appealed to the hordes of 8pedos that came here.

Stop rewriting history 8channers, you have always been the pedochan, never enrive.

>>2128

>Stop rewriting history 8channers, you have always been the pedochan, never enrive.

You've already scared me away from browsing your newly branded masterchan. If I recall, there's a new Chan federation with heavy shilling and scams behind them to deanonymize certain users.

You, being a shill and a shit one, should have avoided all wording of pedos or classifying 8channers as the opposition to your board. That drives people back and makes me think "Why is this nigger so hostile when he's advertising a board?"

Your post is smellier than a fish warf. Get fucked.

>>2128

its actually funny how similar masterchan and 8chan played out, both uncucked imageboards full of outcasts and growing in popularity then suddenly doing a 180 and cucking themselves and losing their entire userbase.

the fact that you're so eager to try and disconnect yourselves from the userbase that used to breathe life into your site for better or for worse just goes to show whatever you make now is destined for failure just like this shithole.

the people you're trying to cater to now already have an imageboard they're happy with, its called 4chan.

>>2165

I wouldn't exactly say 8ch cucked itself, though I did prefer cripplekike to jim. It went through cycles of pedoniggers and that eventually thinned out.

The users left on 8ch besides the pedos were some pretty ok fags, on most boards anyway. The pedos were there for a long time and in big numbers sure, but in my estimate the site wasn't culturally pedo, it was split pretty cleanly. I don't consider loli to be pedo, there's some overlap but that's two groups.

Now, mchan was the kind of place where you could smell the pedoniggers through your screen as they call eachother chum and talk about cunny. That shit gets annoying after awhile but at least it drives 4cuck away since they haven't been able to handle that for about 7 years.

>>2176

well the problem with that logic is that you're deciding what the proportion of pedos are based on the subject matter, when anons are talking about anything other than how much kids make their dicks hard you just assume they're not pedos and that there must be a clean cut between them and the pedos that supposedly do nothing but stay in their one thread dedicated to talking about how sexy kids are.

its like thinking that theres a clean cut between the people who larp as nazis and people who don't because the only time you know about them is when they're sperging out over the jews.

theres tons of them on /v/ just talking about video games and if they were all ousted from the site then the activity across the entire site would suffer because there isn't a clean cut between them and the rest of the userbase.

>>2179

mainly just going by how there were posters that were definitely pedo and posters definitely anti-pedo. But yeah without access to post history I actually can't prove if mundane looking posts were actually made by cp spammers in their downtime.

If pedo = willing to dick real life kids then I'm pretty sure there weren't actually that many. Kinda like how there are tons of furries with their awkward 2d furry porn but not that many actual horsefuckers. So, the gubbermint and a big part of society probably won't agree with me on this but if you fap to images of kids, animals, dead bodies, etc, yet you don't want to seek any of that out in person, then you're not a pedo, or zoo, or necro, etc. Those are warning signs but they don't seal the deal.

Assuming that we can make that hard cut at "have you actually dicked x before" then 8ch didn't have that many "real" pedos. But I could be terribly wrong. Maybe all the smash bros threads actually were made by hardcore child pornographers. wouldn't be too surprising

>>2194

thats a lot like saying you can fap to all the gay porn you want but you aren't gay until you take a dick in the ass.

I feel the exact opposite about it, what you're jerking it to indicates what you want in the real world whether you're willing to acknowledge it and act on it or not.

that goes for 2D as well, you can relegate your sexual interests to just drawings all you want but at the end of the day if you're fapping to doujins featuring elementary school girls getting molested by their teachers then you're a fucking pedo end of story.

>>2196

I understand that position cause I kinda flip flop between the two just depending on my mood. obviously I wouldn't want some dude with a bunch of cp to be a preschool teacher, that would make me nervous, but I also don't think he should be torn in the butthole by jamal in prison unless he's actually done the deed or planned it as far as buying ropes, a white van and lollipops and whatever else standard pedo equipment.

maybe depends on country but if fapping to schoolgirl doujins makes you a pedo then japan should be the rape center of the world but it's actually one of the safest so that doesn't always hold.

this stuff is probably easier to explain using scat fetishists. I don't think everyone who faps to scat pictures/videos will be able to play with or eat actual poop in real life. would bet money that some of them smell the real thing and their boner goes away. there's a lot of extreme porn out there and it's very easy to access for everyone but I doubt in most cases, porn alone creates fetishes powerful enough to make people willing to eat poo or fuck kids or something else that our brains are wired to avoid.

in some cases I would argue that extreme porn actually makes people do the opposite of what it depicts. obvious example being cuck/blacked shit. before this was spammed everywhere I didn't even think about interracial relationships. now if I see couples like this I think "what a waste" and "what's wrong with the world" and such. the negative thoughts aren't enough to make me bring the subject up with them, much less do anything violent, but the thoughts are still there. so really in summary your view is probably more easy to implement legally and easier to explain to people but I think it's oversimplifying.

>>4824

those are called paragraphs which is how you avoid making a wall of text.

>>1972

>So if you're wondering how they deal with pedo content, the answer is they dont

I spit my coffee.

>>4865

clutch those pearls edith

>>4867

I didn't spit no coffee because I think pedos are bed my man.