>>45034
I guess it comes down to chance. I come from a weird half-esoteric half-bureaucratic family. I remember as a young child, around 12 or so, I was outside with my lawyer father and I saw one of those anarchist grafittis and it said something like "the state is the biggest criminal organization" and I sort of made a joke about it to my father and asked why they would write that and my father dead-serious said to me "because it's true". And then on my mother's side I have a sort of shaman-type "flow" passed through. It's not that I managed to evade it, I was just blessed with complimentary crazy parents. My mother is quite gullible concerning politics and history, my father quite gullible concerning anything outside politics and law and history, so I grew up never really knowing what to believe and always being curious. In my opinion it really comes down to what you choose to believe, and that will then manifest more or less. I chose a long time ago that subjectivity is real but objectivity should be possible. So yeah, call it blessed or chance or whatever, but belief absolutely matters and I believe that the government spooks can be beaten. if you want to go into it I also believe that apotheosis is possible completely bonkers I know
>I trust the government less with each passing day
Everything under the heavens is in utter chaos; the situation is excellent - Mao Zedong
>>45038
Very susceptible yes, but kraut isn't kraut. Bavarians for example really are almost a different nation compared to say Hamburgians or Berliners or Cologneians. Personally I would say krauts are just really efficient at whatever they choose to do. They're a very industrial people. Of course you also have the Swiss and Austrians which are a thing to themselves, because they do not consider themselves german. Sort of like how americans speak english and yet would never consider themselves british.
>>45039
I would say it creates more chaos and thus sets free more energy potential but those are semantics. I agree.
>>45042
>why would they remove him from social media
Because the show must go on. The dialectic cannot be broken. The kayfabe must be maintained.
>strangle him financially
because that's what you would expect if he really was a dangerous whistleblowing truthtalker
>depersoned
He might be a mossad asset so it wouldn't matter, but that's afaik just speculation like everything concerning the world controllers. The dude's an actor, maybe one of the greatest comedians of all time. Watch some Bill Hicks clips on youtube. Bill Hicks is Alex Jones without the Rush Limbaugh persona.